Hitzig v Canada
Hitzig v Canada is a 2003 civil case in which challenged the constitutionality of the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR), now the Medical Marihuana Access Division. MMAR provided for exemptions from the law for approved medicinal users while allowing for no legal source of therapeutic cannabis products. The case was brought by Warren Hitzig, along with seven medical marijuana users (Alison Myrden, Stephen J Vandekemp, Marco Renda, Marylynne Chamney, Catherine Devries, Jari Dvorak and Debbie Stultz-Giffen).
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Hitzig v Canada
Hitzig v Canada is a 2003 civil case in which challenged the constitutionality of the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR), now the Medical Marihuana Access Division. MMAR provided for exemptions from the law for approved medicinal users while allowing for no legal source of therapeutic cannabis products. The case was brought by Warren Hitzig, along with seven medical marijuana users (Alison Myrden, Stephen J Vandekemp, Marco Renda, Marylynne Chamney, Catherine Devries, Jari Dvorak and Debbie Stultz-Giffen).
has abstract
Hitzig v Canada is a 2003 civi ...... ystems in Flin Flon, Manitoba.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
719,683,040
subject
hypernym
comment
Hitzig v Canada is a 2003 civi ...... rak and Debbie Stultz-Giffen).
@en
label
Hitzig v Canada
@en