James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act.
has abstract
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [ ...... e coverage under the 1998 Act.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
15,464,563
Wikipage revision ID
637,556,211
citations
[2007] UKEAT 0475_06_2102, [2007] ICR 1006, [2007] IRLR 296
date decided
2007-02-21
keywords
name
James v Redcats Ltd
opinions
subject
hypernym
comment
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [ ...... e coverage under the 1998 Act.
@en
label
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
@en