King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Court's decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise established by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Court's decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise established by the Department of Health and Human Services.
has abstract
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. ___ ...... apply in every State as well."
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
43,303,883
Wikipage revision ID
742,728,208
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Caption
date decided
2014-07-22
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
Section 36B of the ACA provide ...... broader structure of the Act".
imagesize
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
judges
A. Raymond Randolph,
Andre M. Davis
Harry T. Edwards
Roger Gregory,
keywords
Litigants
King v. Burwell
majority
name
Halbig v. Burwell
King v. Burwell
OpinionAnnouncement
opinions
The IRS does not have the stat ...... dolph. Judge Edwards dissents.
The plaintiffs contend that th ...... se of the agency’s discretion.
OralArgument
prior actions
Summary judgment for government defendants, 2014 WL 129023
SCOTUS
subsequent actions
Rehearing en banc ordered .
subject
comment
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. ___ ...... of Health and Human Services.
@en
label
King v. Burwell
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
David King, et al., Petitioner ...... lth and Human Services, et al.
@en