Miron v Trudel
Miron v Trudel, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 418 is a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision on equality rights under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where the Court found "marital status" was an analogous ground for discrimination (i.e., a characteristic which cannot legally be the basis for discrimination under section 15). The Court held that an insurance benefit provided only to married couples discriminated against common-law couples. Miron sued the insurance company arguing that he was discriminated against and that the Insurance Act violated section 15.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Miron v Trudel
Miron v Trudel, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 418 is a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision on equality rights under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where the Court found "marital status" was an analogous ground for discrimination (i.e., a characteristic which cannot legally be the basis for discrimination under section 15). The Court held that an insurance benefit provided only to married couples discriminated against common-law couples. Miron sued the insurance company arguing that he was discriminated against and that the Insurance Act violated section 15.
has abstract
Miron v Trudel, [1995] 2 S.C.R ...... ses should not affect dignity.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
740,006,054
case-name
Miron v Trudel
citations
[1995] 2 S.C.R. 418
Concurrence
L'Heureux‑Dubé J.
decided-date
1995-05-25
Dissent
Docket
full-case-name
John O Miron and Jocelyne Vall ...... mical Mutual Insurance Company
heard-date
1994-06-02
JoinDissent
Lamer C.J. and La Forest and Major JJ.
JoinMajority
Sopinka, Cory and Iacobucci JJ.
majority
ruling
Miron appeal allowed
subject
hypernym
type
comment
Miron v Trudel, [1995] 2 S.C.R ...... rance Act violated section 15.
@en
label
Miron v Trudel
@en