Morey v. Doud
Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1957), was a case where Doud and two partners sold 'Bondified' brand money orders in Illinois, directly or through agents such as drug and grocery stores. A state law required any seller or issuer of money orders to secure a license and submit to state regulation, except that the statute, by name, explicitly exempted the American Express Company from these requirements.
primaryTopic
Morey v. Doud
Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1957), was a case where Doud and two partners sold 'Bondified' brand money orders in Illinois, directly or through agents such as drug and grocery stores. A state law required any seller or issuer of money orders to secure a license and submit to state regulation, except that the statute, by name, explicitly exempted the American Express Company from these requirements.
has abstract
Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1 ...... e of the Fourteenth Amendment.
@en
Wikipage page ID
50,442,820
Wikipage revision ID
730,496,075
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
A state may not grant a specif ...... s applicable to everyone else.
JoinDissent
Litigants
majority
ParallelCitations
SCOTUS
comment
Morey v. Doud, 354 U.S. 457 (1 ...... mpany from these requirements.
@en
label
Morey v. Doud
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Lloyd Morey, Auditor of Public ...... s as Bondified Systems, et al.
@en