Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc.
OPG v. Diebold, 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), more officially known as Online Policy Group (OPG), Nelson Chu Pavlosky, and Luke Thomas Smith v. Diebold, Incorporated and Diebold Election Systems, Incorporated (now Premier Election Solutions), was a lawsuit involving an archive of Diebold's internal company e-mails and Diebold's contested copyright claims over them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic provided pro bono legal support for the non-profit ISP and the Swarthmore College students, respectively.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc.
OPG v. Diebold, 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), more officially known as Online Policy Group (OPG), Nelson Chu Pavlosky, and Luke Thomas Smith v. Diebold, Incorporated and Diebold Election Systems, Incorporated (now Premier Election Solutions), was a lawsuit involving an archive of Diebold's internal company e-mails and Diebold's contested copyright claims over them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic provided pro bono legal support for the non-profit ISP and the Swarthmore College students, respectively.
has abstract
OPG v. Diebold, 337 F. Supp. 2 ...... in court, and set a precedent.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
740,932,781
subject
comment
OPG v. Diebold, 337 F. Supp. 2 ...... ollege students, respectively.
@en
label
Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc.
@en