R v Clay
R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the prohibition to possess marijuana. The accused claimed that his section 7 Charter rights were violated. The Court dismissed the claim. This case is the final of a trilogy of cases regarding the constitutionality of the prohibition of marijuana.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
R v Clay
R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the prohibition to possess marijuana. The accused claimed that his section 7 Charter rights were violated. The Court dismissed the claim. This case is the final of a trilogy of cases regarding the constitutionality of the prohibition of marijuana.
has abstract
R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, ...... the prohibition of marijuana.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
685,894,340
case-name
citations
[2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75
Concurrence/Dissent
decided-date
2003-12-23
full-case-name
Christopher James Clay v. Her Majesty The Queen
heard-date
2003-05-06
JoinMajority
McLachlin CJ. with Iacobucci, Major, and Bastarache JJ.
majority
Gonthier and Binnie JJ.
hypernym
comment
R v Clay [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, ...... the prohibition of marijuana.
@en
label
R v Clay
@en