R v Starr
R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision that re-evaluated several principles of evidence. In particular, they held that the "principled approach" hearsay evidence under R v Khan and R v Smith (1992) can be equally used to exclude otherwise admissible hearsay evidence. In addition, the Court examined the judge's charge to the jury on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
R v Starr
R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision that re-evaluated several principles of evidence. In particular, they held that the "principled approach" hearsay evidence under R v Khan and R v Smith (1992) can be equally used to exclude otherwise admissible hearsay evidence. In addition, the Court examined the judge's charge to the jury on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
has abstract
R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 ...... of beyond a reasonable doubt.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
722,096,186
case-name
Chief Justice
Antonio Lamer C.J. /Beverley McLachlin C.J.
citations
[2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, 2000 SCC 40
decided-date
2000-09-29
Dissent
L’Heureux‑Dubé J.
McLachlin C.J.
full-case-name
Robert Dennis Starr v Her Majesty The Queen
heard-date
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Major, Binnie, Arbour and Lebel JJ.
LawsApplied
R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320
majority
puisne-justices
( hearing only, rehearing only)
L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory ...... , Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.
subject
hypernym
type
comment
R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 ...... of beyond a reasonable doubt.
@en
label
R v Starr
@en