Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006)
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, 547 U.S. 9 (2006), was a lengthy and high-profile U.S. legal case interpreting and applying the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO): a law originally drafted to combat the mafia and organized crime, the Hobbs Act: an anti-extortion law prohibiting interference with commerce by violence or threat of violence, and the Travel Act: a law prohibiting interstate travel in support of racketeering.
Wikipage disambiguates
Wikipage redirect
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006)
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, 547 U.S. 9 (2006), was a lengthy and high-profile U.S. legal case interpreting and applying the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO): a law originally drafted to combat the mafia and organized crime, the Hobbs Act: an anti-extortion law prohibiting interference with commerce by violence or threat of violence, and the Travel Act: a law prohibiting interstate travel in support of racketeering.
has abstract
Scheidler v. National Organiza ...... el in support of racketeering.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
711,919,539
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, 547 U.S. 9
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
The Hobbs Act did not apply to ...... Circuit reversed and remanded.
JoinMajority
Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
majority
NotParticipating
other source
other url
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Scheidler v. National Organiza ...... el in support of racketeering.
@en
label
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006)
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Joseph Scheidler, et al. v.National Organization for Women, Inc., et al.
@en