Taylor v. Illinois
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that defense witnesses can be prevented from testifying under certain circumstances, even if that hurts the defense's case. Taylor was the first case to hold that there is no absolute bar to blocking the testimony of a surprise witness, even if that is an essential witness for the defendant, a limitation of the broad right to present a defense recognized in Washington v. Texas.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Taylor v. Illinois
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that defense witnesses can be prevented from testifying under certain circumstances, even if that hurts the defense's case. Taylor was the first case to hold that there is no absolute bar to blocking the testimony of a surprise witness, even if that is an essential witness for the defendant, a limitation of the broad right to present a defense recognized in Washington v. Texas.
has abstract
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 4 ...... to list appropriate witnesses.
@en
泰勒诉伊利诺伊州案(英语:Taylor v. Illinoi ...... 被告的律师没有完全列出其证人名单就对被告的这一权利加以限制。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
35,303,006
Wikipage revision ID
646,346,638
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
findlaw
Holding
The refusal to allow an undisc ...... nois Appellate Court affirmed.
JoinDissent
Marshall, Blackmun
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, White
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Taylor v. Illinois
majority
NotParticipating
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 4 ...... gnized in Washington v. Texas.
@en
泰勒诉伊利诺伊州案(英语:Taylor v. Illinoi ...... 被告的律师没有完全列出其证人名单就对被告的这一权利加以限制。
@zh
label
Taylor v. Illinois
@en
泰勒诉伊利诺伊州案
@zh
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Ray Taylor v. State of Illinois
@en