Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications - Wikidata - thesis-toulmin - TriplyDB

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24289259

about

A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?Association claims in the sequencing era Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review How Do You Know It Is True? Integrity in Research and Publications: AOA Critical Issues Editorial: preclinical data reproducibility for R&D - the challenge for neuroscience Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game Plagiarism's Poison: Avoiding Scientific Misconduct A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition Irreproducibility of published bioscience research: Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications Redundant publication: expect the unexpected Look back in anger - what clinical studies tell us about preclinical work “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development What is open peer review? A systematic review Evidence-informed person-centered healthcare part I: do 'cognitive biases plus' at organizational levels influence quality of evidence?How likely is it that biological agents will be used deliberately to cause widespread harm? Policymakers and scientists need to take seriously the possibility that potential pandemic pathogens will be misused.4Ps medicine of the fatty liver: the research model of predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine-recommendations for facing obesity, fatty liver and fibrosis epidemics.Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact Peer review: from recognition to improved practices.Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution.Epilepsy therapy development: technical and methodologic issues in studies with animal models Internet publicity of data problems in the bioscience literature correlates with enhanced corrective action Data fraud in clinical trials.Incidence of Data Duplications in a Randomly Selected Pool of Life Science Publications.The impact of fraudulent and irreproducible data to the translational research crisis - solutions and implementation.Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012.A survey of retracted articles in dentistry Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences.The disaster of the impact factor.

P2860

Q21090756-E1D366C6-3CFF-45DD-818E-F36CA44D75B7 Q21129393-A7F4C98A-A826-44C5-9E9D-C8A7F84724CE Q21132700-65B6D307-0D80-448D-8635-BA01DC08AF96 Q24273315-316D070F-8669-4422-AB6D-44E337217A90 Q24273366-3E4264B2-04F4-4782-B6CE-44842BD06920 Q24273411-509A66A7-43BF-4D40-8A5C-DEBC62ECBA3B Q24288898-E2D0F977-542E-4312-BA4D-8D379730B3CE Q24288992-532DA583-2687-4B58-9BF8-A1C62BEF4291 Q24289253-0280F06B-7627-4835-997F-DDA00BF9C907 Q24289257-26D0A8BF-8189-44C2-93C0-F93C00E90B9F Q26776402-2713BFDC-B152-4F47-BE14-845235E2533A Q26779622-5397534A-EA5B-431F-9DFE-6803E660E6F1 Q26785702-B8588CF3-0C26-4DAC-9949-A83DF94EF92D Q26857957-64E12079-FB98-4E18-94AF-3ED8BA839F76 Q27033640-8EED1A8D-C7C0-4BA2-960D-6F6A06C6BC8F Q28583395-E3D5577B-4784-4F8A-B910-877EBB249D3B Q28596390-C2D0EA9D-CEA5-4A1C-846D-4CD2F79645B5 Q28631063-EE766627-1CD6-479B-9482-6963112BA921 Q28649919-0B54FB52-443C-482C-B3F6-D6BC0C5F64CF Q28677000-D9F1BE1A-1070-4FF9-8CA9-2595727D52FD Q29017249-5F100067-C80B-4C6B-B28F-DDCB32DBB43D Q29040183-58C71735-FC41-4B38-A71E-57F3EF03AE16 Q29649956-0BD82B11-A845-4C36-AD3C-ADECE647EAA6 Q30368983-25001C77-A773-4001-804F-690B1C7B80F6 Q30382649-C14FF08F-4EC9-4D85-9BB2-DD90534D0665 Q30412771-B507AFAE-EF51-44B4-8475-02730418BE1F Q30486792-1C38C8F3-1165-45D1-A1D6-19F1AB8FC3BD Q30489344-DF37FEEC-C78F-4316-87F0-85858C79ADC0 Q30491949-29A3367B-B532-4A1A-BD59-8ADE5BD97A97 Q30543230-05A5101D-3C2B-4428-BF08-FD1E0A198256 Q30808769-506CCC31-DAB1-4670-9397-5B22DE751ACC Q30902176-00342405-F060-42B4-B70C-A5DD48AA335F Q30969930-2BE6B6A6-95E6-49D5-8F36-DCACBE6B363D Q31140087-74D3A7CF-39F4-4C17-96DE-33272847964D Q33576182-0A4A4F42-7419-417E-92BA-7AC87C990132 Q33852090-88782BD5-FDE2-4F37-B4CC-99D056DE3420 Q33882499-353D32AE-2A65-44FD-8055-18609EBF4C47 Q34042935-FB2D1415-4016-45E6-A585-FEAE036F9620 Q34211450-1D6504CD-D8D1-4734-8EF8-1199CE9BF1BD Q34400435-97F51AB0-92FD-4CBF-A726-C08AB83DEF05

P2860

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24289259

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2012 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年論文

@yue

2012年論文

@zh-hant

2012年論文

@zh-hk

2012年論文

@zh-mo

2012年論文

@zh-tw

2012年论文

@wuu

name

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@ast

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en-gb

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@nl

type

label

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@ast

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en-gb

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@nl

prefLabel

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@ast

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en-gb

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@nl

P1433

Q24289259-94FEACF8-2415-489F-81E8-8B796E6934C5

P1476

Q24289259-B7AE3DF9-E95B-4F7E-94AE-C9F8B435B71A

P2093

Q24289259-932E0B70-FEB8-438D-B76A-4AF0CE03CF01

P2860

Q24289259-0AD72A18-3399-41BB-A403-DEE8BEF7D373

Q24289259-2BC96E55-D149-4B9B-B239-475007EF5860

Q24289259-2EA50828-E163-4DE8-90CA-38797C52701F

Q24289259-2EC3DDCE-EDE0-407B-8287-89227F686A61

Q24289259-2F18BB29-1A87-4F7F-8F4C-2EB6A53C5071

Q24289259-4DAC8A9B-AF22-4273-AE11-79664C520D48

Q24289259-4DEC3C27-CDFD-4AC8-A7B0-0F10629DF89B

Q24289259-524D907A-0963-4347-909F-F2F5C574698E

Q24289259-56F3845E-72B3-40E0-B65D-938DEAABA3AC

Q24289259-577DABB9-E179-4DD7-AA7B-B205CB92EDD8

P304

Q24289259-FE4A84EA-6E47-4CBC-B8E2-223B9D771188

P31

Q24289259-8872B813-49EE-411B-8F05-43841AB3C4EE

P3181

Q24289259-D22BC56F-F1F0-4EF9-9350-1602F554F45A

P356

Q24289259-893A38D5-FCD6-488E-9EE7-B8E9765824A8

P407

Q24289259-665F3BFD-C2C7-4A85-B25F-072395D4B016

P433

Q24289259-2D868559-0A5A-4CDA-AA69-CD88294610A9

P478

Q24289259-CD154EA5-556C-4DD9-8D79-D9B99E884790

P50

Q24289259-D500C7D9-505E-4B85-8357-BE3EA8EBCB64

Q24289259-DA815F76-78E3-4D95-A1E4-EEA1E0069EA6

P577

Q24289259-309FEAFA-0F5B-4A29-88DF-F0750625964B

P5875

Q24289259-6369477F-9A7B-4945-AD87-979B7F76458A

P698

Q24289259-63C46101-D629-4932-B0B6-673536FF40CC

P921

Q24289259-0c14c86c-4b17-3771-cb72-64fae4f653ce

P932

Q24289259-C4B40970-EDDC-4924-96FB-E1F5B6B60882

P3181

P356

PNAS.1212247109

P1433

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

P1476

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

@en

P2093

R Grant Steen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Why most published research findings are false

How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data

Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms

Research efficiency: Perverse incentives

Reforming science: structural reforms

Scientists behaving badly

RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children

Quality of protein crystal structures.

Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.

P304

17028-33

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P3181

727667

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1073/PNAS.1212247109

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

42

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

109

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Arturo Casadevall

P577

2012-10-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

231742591

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23027971

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

3479492

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string