What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
about
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription JournalsEffect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trialEmerging Themes in Epidemiology: Form and functionInter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conferencePeer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort studyAlternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluationPeer review in PLoS MedicineRewarding reviewers - sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explainedManuscript peer review--a guide for health care professionals.Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review qualityEffect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review.Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem.Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.Politics in surgical publishing.How to review a paper.How I review an original scientific article.Recommendations for reviewing a manuscript for the GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung.Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.The scholarship of critical review: improving quality and relevance.Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer.How to review journal manuscripts.Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.Reviewing the peer review.Reviewing scientific manuscripts.Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journalsThe editorial process: Peer review.The ethics of peer review in bioethicsAcceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.Advancing kinesiology through improved peer review.Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians.Entering the electronic age: risks and challenges for JGIM.
P2860
Q22665458-F87CB6B6-9E05-4313-A712-B3C32B02ED3DQ24648998-A5E94CB2-FA63-4487-8A85-D581E920A72BQ24804569-190E7724-A22C-47C8-A2AD-52ED128B3F05Q24805823-F89C4C15-B93F-4193-BA03-B4359C76A33FQ26783905-C14FABA3-62BE-4671-B373-162832E672FEQ28741517-30C235C8-46C7-4585-B77B-502D0276B5D6Q28763694-12F24441-7660-4D8F-B47B-45D8EDC73D1CQ29702282-2975D867-EC35-4DA3-8AFC-BF2E0096F30BQ30233612-429D0326-EBF1-4852-BF56-F8EAEEB2A9B9Q30249679-7E4F077A-5176-4B1F-A8F8-C367AB120637Q33281282-0FEA2A53-D7F2-415E-A173-2D09DD9AD107Q33778862-E250709E-4DF9-4B88-A382-8BCAC11816E7Q33810540-C01A6BCE-6FDF-4943-B479-9539C0715211Q33829090-6571FCC8-CC27-4DD1-8F12-94256559F405Q34030771-B6FC5781-DD72-42F0-B859-6D363D5210DEQ34067568-668E04B9-9E3F-45AD-A0C7-8B11F7F60611Q34198983-237A0851-9B8E-47AF-8EC0-D462DE4DA1B0Q34962898-57F4C5CA-6CF5-4CC7-BD26-A2D7682B8EDBQ35118117-995DD3BD-7521-42B4-BAF2-0B216C014E1EQ35680672-FF12E1A1-FBE4-4D24-83E9-3BDFB94E6305Q35990825-A38C1848-C8BE-4951-8207-4CCF3CA5A0A9Q36274704-78F44DC1-50F2-47AC-88A7-A06B31EFC657Q37004438-9CF34936-472D-4624-A518-503A097AEA3BQ37673217-F52CE47A-EF0A-45ED-BFB6-309E6777CEEEQ37715413-C8EFC9BC-B468-4EE9-AD12-81F48EDBFC4AQ37826225-782EF4F7-B224-4593-907F-8307853EE454Q37832154-CE24F458-75E2-4027-88FD-57C71AD0FAB1Q37909548-C75EF730-EEF9-4673-98B6-79D2236D83F1Q38014155-376139DA-F4E7-41F7-AFD3-1A4472A0840AQ38036603-09E982A7-840F-4A69-B588-BADF7D21797DQ38137082-1569D2E5-F043-4D41-9F56-1E97315AC36EQ38153174-C032DD71-8100-49DA-ACAB-F66FFDDD00BCQ38209568-63E45602-318B-417D-A858-8A371A4C336EQ38237401-E6051622-3EF4-402C-ADF7-C6766E31D477Q38258827-EF1F0C90-ADB2-4831-B80C-A5462AB622C0Q39011265-FB9AB74D-29B2-4FDB-8958-AAA09CC1E84FQ39384481-EFB2EDB7-E04E-4FAD-805F-2A796CE2B713Q42120144-681A4DF5-BD27-42DD-A924-3A1E6CE4C4A6Q42330683-2B541C79-B8B9-4C4F-8F88-D8F3ED32E0DCQ42346705-92744A39-5235-4631-99CC-5155050F1EC7
P2860
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1998 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年学术文章
@wuu
1998年学术文章
@zh-cn
1998年学术文章
@zh-hans
1998年学术文章
@zh-my
1998年学术文章
@zh-sg
1998年學術文章
@yue
name
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@ast
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en-gb
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@nl
type
label
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@ast
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en-gb
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@nl
prefLabel
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@ast
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en-gb
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@nl
P3181
P356
P1476
What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?
@en
P2093
Nick Black
P3181
P356
10.1001/JAMA.280.3.231
P407
P577
1998-07-15T00:00:00Z