Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
about
Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic reviewAnniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference libraryOptimization of reference library used in content-based medical image retrieval scheme.How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.The magnetic resonance shutter speed discriminates vascular properties of malignant and benign breast tumors in vivo.Probabilistic computer model developed from clinical data in national mammography database format to classify mammographic findings.Histopathological image analysis for centroblasts classification through dimensionality reduction approaches.Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers.Quality assurance and training procedures for computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems in clinical useWho could benefit the most from using a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography?Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer on tissue sectionsComputer-Aided Diagnosis in Mammography Using Content-based Image Retrieval Approaches: Current Status and Future PerspectivesIs an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?Assessing operating characteristics of CAD algorithms in the absence of a gold standard.Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration.Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratificationUsing computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision supportEvolution of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population: clinical and economic implications.Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benignComputer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators.Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effectComputer-aided detection of breast cancer - have all bases been covered?Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions using conventional digital photography: a reliability and feasibility study.Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.Patients' & healthcare professionals' values regarding true- & false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: discrete choice experiment.Plasma biomarker profiles differ depending on breast cancer subtype but RANTES is consistently increased.Automated breast image classification using features from its discrete cosine transform.Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practiceRadiologists' perceptions of computer aided detection versus double reading for mammography interpretation.Automatic detection of follicular regions in H&E images using iterative shape index.False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection.A CAD System for Hemorrhagic Stroke.Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.Improving the performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method.
P2860
Q27014642-233AA951-ABB8-481D-A45A-419DF509ABEDQ30485015-2B958548-E533-4AE5-B4A0-EB3063291832Q33292036-55E19DED-8564-4EB2-BD5E-4575D23703FCQ33309714-45AD9C8D-B063-4BFE-9E76-DB76A7A7B9F5Q33370698-FB83652F-6636-4675-AD59-14F51AE2F865Q33384078-420300F6-1D01-42B6-97F2-28ECABFBF47AQ33430221-83E91D83-C3A1-463E-A3BD-3AC1FD2579D0Q33598514-44003834-D0AA-4555-9FCC-FC9DFC25B524Q33639140-D5A4CD50-27BE-4371-B385-5D8DCF088A3EQ33708182-05B4FA19-E1B4-441F-9F52-DA38CF34800DQ33713033-65B5F9FF-3D3A-434E-9E8E-703C262D87F9Q33718744-8FB31238-784B-4A1E-9A3C-B83E8933287BQ33737927-BAE38B6C-FA4F-4463-B395-85815A9BC56DQ33797843-1FA4CB4A-A957-4318-8E98-EB2047267B84Q33830173-DCA2753E-8062-4A1F-B6BD-112532511E86Q33964312-AD8E07F3-8FB5-4676-BACC-D5F555651633Q34060566-07B18BB1-8AF6-42AC-B7B3-BB0124361CD0Q34126888-53763972-FF9B-46DD-8D1B-055AC5730C16Q34130573-919D8171-DF4A-46E2-80A3-67A83A73CD0CQ34137696-9EB1F585-E0A2-44E2-A430-5D2AE3BE92C8Q34184241-3F202376-2FD7-4174-8755-EF2713D0514EQ34188445-1020AD55-62CA-483C-B556-89FAF64FA80FQ34193726-082FE4E5-AB73-4EC0-A0B8-D5A6B10B9FB4Q34279710-DB063352-8877-4DC1-B3DA-E2DE714935CCQ34721725-8DA235B8-17B2-43D4-8659-8B345DB0AEBFQ34754680-CFCFB303-44B8-4727-AFD9-B663038B836EQ34897349-12952B6D-66E0-4A19-8C8A-2E0620F50FC3Q35040597-9D31C68E-523F-49BA-B854-49DE7C3228D1Q35061813-703A618A-55B2-40A6-AF32-73EB7BBDB087Q35069426-56A3ABA4-1378-49E8-BF9D-6EBE8C87112AQ35093772-82CAEFD7-E992-4810-82A2-7CC7962A835BQ35121782-4999FE44-9EB2-4CC3-9017-D2BACB71EE6CQ35143960-8E8B7AC5-CAA1-4236-9246-9CB8C0E4DE63Q35146647-6081FB58-6A38-45BD-8D89-6C1A50566CC8Q35151023-E79B6721-3877-4C04-A1D3-9AD8B6820BECQ35233412-A6984752-5191-49F4-A649-80D70CB6CF70Q35241635-3B01DFC1-5D2E-4700-BEF9-295D21C3EA17Q35671228-38ACE9C1-900F-42BF-BB27-FDE9206002DDQ35742550-8005DAC8-F11E-4B6A-8014-1BEB83E56CDBQ35848240-36DF36FD-DB07-4290-9E83-102BD3AE70F3
P2860
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@ast
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@en
type
label
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@ast
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@en
prefLabel
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@ast
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
@en
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
P1476
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography
@en
P2093
Carl D'Orsi
Edward A Sickles
Eric A Berns
Gary Cutter
Joann G Elmore
Linn Abraham
Patricia A Carney
R Edward Hendrick
Stephen H Taplin
William E Barlow
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA066099
P407
P577
2007-04-01T00:00:00Z