Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis.
about
The economic burden of disease by industry: differences in quality-adjusted life years and associated costsValidity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrumentEstimates of utility weights in hemophilia: implications for cost-utility analysis of clotting factor prophylaxisReview of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online databaseUS valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.Predicting EQ-5D-US and SF-6D societal health state values from the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire.Domains of quality of life: results of a three-stage Delphi consensus procedure among patients, family of patients, clinicians, scientists and the general public.Measuring the quality of life in hypertension according to Item Response TheoryValidation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life.The effect of comorbidity on health-related quality of life for injury patients in the first year following injury: comparison of three comorbidity adjustment approachesCost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United StatesWhy do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and 'micro-utility' effectsConstruction of the descriptive system for the Assessment of Quality of Life AQoL-6D utility instrument.Standard error of measurement of 5 health utility indexes across the range of health for use in estimating reliability and responsiveness.Some comments on mapping from disease-specific to generic health-related quality-of-life scales.Agreement about identifying patients who change over time: cautionary results in cataract and heart failure patients.Patient and societal value functions for the testing morbidities index"When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling": interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.Estimating QALY gains in applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010.Interpersonal discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United States.Erratum to: Interpersonal discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United StatesQALY weights for neurosensory impairments in pediatric economic evaluations: case studies and a critique.Sourcing quality-of-life weights obtained from previous studies: theory and reality in Korea.Framing of mobility items: a source of poor agreement between preference-based health-related quality of life instruments in a population of individuals receiving assisted ventilation.Health Status, Health Shocks, and Asset Adequacy Over Retirement Years.Using Linear Equating to Map PROMIS(®) Global Health Items and the PROMIS-29 V2.0 Profile Measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3.Health state descriptions, valuations and individuals' capacity to walk: a comparative evaluation of preference-based instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.Mapping between 6 Multiattribute Utility Instruments.Cost effectiveness of an intervention focused on reducing bathing disability.The added effect of comorbidity on health-related quality of life in patients with asthma.Modelling utility weights for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D.Utility weights for the vision-related Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-7D instrument.Cross-cultural evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF domains in primary care depressed patients using Rasch analysis.Measuring the Sensitivity and Construct Validity of 6 Utility Instruments in 7 Disease Areas.Catalog and comparison of societal preferences (utilities) for lung cancer health states: results from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study.Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained? The need for alternative methods to evaluate medical interventions for ultra-rare disorders.Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments.Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D.Looking at patients' choices through the lens of expected utility: a critique and research agenda.
P2860
Q23911875-279CC478-85FF-417E-A8B6-6A32B7EDD02CQ24603412-C26AEF1E-97E7-4DEA-A0FF-D9696F2BA433Q26865814-C4199AEC-7447-487C-9101-1F1A2E75E4EBQ27026613-094E93A4-DB74-4DC7-8D91-CC3FF5D5162CQ27308886-11B96F4F-EF5C-43F7-8E72-B5C7AAE7FEC8Q30752797-EC6A404C-16D7-4177-8D8F-3036BC9C0368Q33597217-9AAB32C4-CB5C-4581-A86F-0FA34A3A38BBQ33651461-EE040EF2-058D-4A18-9DEE-06C22886CC41Q33694005-276EC061-A2EB-4CEC-A570-F8239B74902BQ34498539-A672C398-759A-4A3A-B5B3-C3B11B1DDFADQ34988822-49393AC8-8E90-4DD6-A558-5166856F50E6Q35451969-419C2A56-F842-4834-8BE5-7E8EF1EA3C4FQ35825864-29A27C9D-1386-4EEA-92CE-A8AAC85FDAEFQ35950711-2A265B4E-A92A-4177-8564-6EEBFA5BC9BAQ36714351-9D6ED95C-5189-4D6E-91D6-2CE47A834B79Q36856803-EB861299-7BC0-4A72-8A17-EB75516899A9Q37112087-F059F725-679A-426B-AC0C-9E77BAC2C5EBQ37278560-890110A4-16BB-4910-9C77-70F43ED9A5FCQ37450255-CCC21644-38BB-4591-A6EC-CBB6D387E6DFQ37660468-E6BA8945-3A54-4D29-9680-0CFDD4B64765Q37680049-68CD1B98-3D45-467F-B47C-7FDAC4766D37Q37689007-2299A9A0-0207-4787-B94A-AFC3CC053BF4Q37764874-EC5A10C3-A1A6-4707-AA02-C3F0D9CF31D3Q38191873-B32AF70B-5F31-4255-B30A-F9CD635C04B4Q38931874-FD4B9934-B3CF-4164-ADB3-8AFC6BA9F5C1Q38970079-E2260AAB-C0D4-4F73-811D-B138367F6AA2Q39820311-6192BB14-92DE-49C5-AFA9-F552778735C4Q40789330-7546F32F-09BB-4F27-B95E-9A13DE865A28Q41117203-5859E306-2F6B-4326-A62B-15F5260AC80FQ41636128-D5B99284-5C21-49F6-8A28-04ACCA8B4EC1Q41698270-72CFF4A7-D8B8-4F6A-A632-7B9D7B4F4F09Q44123410-93DFB65D-A164-43FD-BBE7-A032F8D1ECE9Q46068539-0788EC80-DC9C-49BB-AB24-5C3C22D19C6BQ47275298-DD40A1E8-274C-4A1B-97DC-2030120FC1E7Q47569275-45F7EA2A-D785-4A96-9248-FA1D8D04C6EAQ47570767-12FCE282-3143-4388-A19B-C9664A724F8DQ47571494-7E9A2374-9155-4984-B658-5A7BC8A4F157Q47571680-ED3F52C8-DB08-40DA-99B5-771638B368BAQ48372464-93BB585E-F0EF-4A52-AA40-6C987FADB2DEQ48427368-3A25B025-4CA0-471D-8627-FB191920857F
P2860
Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@ast
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@en
type
label
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@ast
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@ast
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Comparison of 5 health-related ...... item response theory analysis.
@en
P2093
Daniel Bolt
Dasha Cherepanov
Dennis G Fryback
Jee-Seon Kim
Mari Palta
P2860
P356
10.1177/0272989X09347016
P577
2009-10-20T00:00:00Z