Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value.
about
Reducing healthcare costs facilitated by surgical auditing: a systematic reviewClinical disease registries in acute myocardial infarctionEmphasizing Public Health Within a Health Information Exchange: An Evaluation of the District of Columbia's Health Information Exchange ProgramInfluences of hospital information systems, indicator data collection and computation on reported Dutch hospital performance indicator scores.Health research and systems' governance are at risk: should the right to data protection override health?Local politico-administrative perspectives on quality improvement based on national registry data in Sweden: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.The impact of a national clinician-led audit initiative on care and mortality after hip fracture in England: an external evaluation using time trends in non-audit data.Implant Optimisation for Primary Hip Replacement in Patients over 60 Years with Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Implant Costs Using Data from England and Wales.The value of pragmatic and observational studies in health care and public health.CKD.QLD: establishment of a chronic kidney disease [CKD] registry in Queensland, Australia.International comparisons of the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and the United States: The MINAP/NICOR, SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA, and ACTION Registry-GWTG/NCDR registriesExtraction of electronic health record data in a hospital setting: comparison of automatic and semi-automatic methods using anti-TNF therapy as model.Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic reviewQuality criteria for medical device registries: best practice approaches for improving patient safety - a systematic review of international experiences.Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in SwedenA comprehensive stroke center patient registry: advantages, limitations, and lessons learnedOpen versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Does the Surgical Technique Influence Pain Outcome? Results from an International RegistryGetting (Along) With the Guidelines: Reconciling Patient Autonomy and Quality Improvement Through Shared Decision Making.Factors facilitating a national quality registry to aid clinical quality improvement: findings of a national survey.Forty years of shunt surgery at Rigshospitalet, Denmark: a retrospective study comparing past and present rates and causes of revision and infection.The importance of clinical pathways and protocols in pediatric nephrology.Need for a roadmap for development of a coordinated national registry programme.Participating in an International Stereotactic Radiotherapy Patient Registry: The Establishment of Data Collection Pathways.JACIE accreditation for blood and marrow transplantation: past, present and future directions of an international model for healthcare quality improvement.Assessment of Confounders in Comparative Effectiveness Studies From Secondary Databases.Interstitial Lung Disease in India. Results of a Prospective Registry.Building a learning health system using clinical registers: a non-technical introduction.The intriguing future of pharmacoepidemiology.How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives.The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Design and Methods of a National Observational Disease Registry.Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.Policies to foster quality improvement registries: lessons from the Swedish case.Clustering and Residual Confounding in the Application of Marginal Structural Models: Dialysis Modality, Vascular Access, and Mortality.[The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives. German Version].Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.European registry for quality improvement in cataract surgery.Developing a Standard Set of Patient-Centred Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease - an International, Cross-disciplinary Consensus.
P2860
Q26862994-1F3BD51F-09A2-40FE-856E-C34A8720FE71Q27025528-98321B5A-6352-4AF1-BCB4-F3B310655589Q28651828-4DA051C3-E60A-4275-A0A3-6A853EEB16D2Q30646654-DC48C2FE-87F2-450C-9DCB-EDBA23315A66Q30708881-E1DBA697-7C19-4AC8-8641-CE6E5DD69AB5Q30882046-2588ECD2-5ED4-4D22-9788-8F05A39AC073Q30980291-55168DF0-9816-465E-B7DD-B9E8A311BCB7Q31022233-A96A7BF5-D738-450A-A07C-54F17FD62033Q33707777-78198888-884F-4CFA-9287-5E979826BCE5Q33776530-993175A7-4865-4137-AE5F-49F5ECA594EAQ33958587-3774B8F1-87E1-43CB-A231-63175BCD668FQ34572340-6B222F83-53B2-4323-83FD-FBDBBF4B044DQ35682121-9CEBC5C7-D4A0-4BDE-9893-8A5526AE2982Q36000392-74746247-66F2-4C81-BB48-1BACC0AF81F4Q36229694-57A10358-25B0-4319-B8E0-D91F3164ACFFQ36321952-E9870449-CD2E-4499-AEF9-B6A2A17C857EQ36603914-1E9AFEA3-BF74-4E9D-A296-ECB0C637E054Q36764675-9D242803-E894-4527-AFA2-10259661D398Q37036719-8428C6C0-1EF1-4EDD-8C9F-7FF01C800D55Q37454343-D032784F-3485-4D1A-8E75-DEFEFDB7801CQ37598317-045CD21C-D042-4F0A-9FC5-08516BFD53D2Q38129801-F4FA6129-00C8-4399-A337-4468AFEE7562Q38583418-8363E331-C94C-4BB7-A4FC-70B34482B63EQ38601333-74AC7C1A-989A-4FC8-9E2E-0A99A959F554Q38739178-947D1C7D-8161-416A-814C-51933237B8FEQ38842054-5CD7FB44-CD64-4A71-A2AC-00E7072EAE16Q38967620-AB71556A-3138-4772-95A2-094A7F0D7E3BQ39325018-FA3128F2-D772-4103-8451-FD929CD3E4A3Q39422831-B8D370D3-82AB-4E23-AA33-F7CC0F1C9DCEQ39513553-35C98F6F-BC0E-4024-8056-82F35A3665D3Q39680619-4C547A0D-9597-40CD-9F22-A10C83B3CD1EQ39851104-766EA54B-3E1C-471B-9137-2389E7A1DA0FQ40050518-60CC830E-151C-456D-991E-ADEFDA4CC147Q40468697-286D5A68-D924-4776-844B-8E4BB7EFA7F9Q40597598-B4DE06E5-3E5E-4518-AAFA-80E5EEE3F9F7Q40711802-0EA0AB87-02EF-4E00-B53B-973107BB9DB0Q41707948-0FA3DC0A-E8C2-451D-B6DC-766A5F929067Q42177550-E2DB9266-63EC-4E61-B148-683ED3AD3B50Q44070139-4F964711-0997-4522-B278-515442FEB47CQ45990517-36467CFE-35EB-4B76-B1E7-2471A45A249C
P2860
Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
name
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@ast
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@en
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@nl
type
label
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@ast
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@en
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@nl
prefLabel
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@ast
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@en
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Use of 13 disease registries i ...... o improve health care's value.
@en
P2093
Bertil Lindahl
Göran Garellick
Mats Lundström
Peter Lawyer
Stefan Larsson
P304
P356
10.1377/HLTHAFF.2011.0762
P407
P577
2011-12-07T00:00:00Z