Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
about
Intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy eastern European schoolchildren: variations in method and corneal thickness.Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure.Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurementDistribution of central corneal thickness and its association with ocular parameters in a large central European cohort: the Gutenberg health study.Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes.The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurementCorrelation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.Poor utility of intraocular pressure correction formulae in individual glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature.Evaluation of the new digital goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure.Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry.Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.New intraocular pressure measurement method using reflected pneumatic pressure from cornea deformed by air puff of ring-type nozzle.Hand-held dynamic contour tonometry.Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patientsComparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness
P2860
Q31107771-D6683348-6E29-4F68-BEC6-28D373077E1EQ33775001-2B63998E-DA13-436B-9FCD-B2ACB98DD804Q34775032-D97E92BA-AA17-4924-AC47-69767B3CFFDCQ34923866-84980CAD-FC2F-43F5-A7E3-7E7520F98DF9Q35161882-EDD6C2F6-9344-43FD-ADFA-608E5E5106A8Q35737354-F6BB8271-260B-4EEA-869F-DF6984748165Q37247549-04AA2AD0-78F8-4D56-BB77-5467F3CDC174Q37802921-180B2D4D-E509-444E-876D-9FBD82CC33FDQ39076576-47E692A2-8717-4395-B814-3F34C284F2C2Q40215149-ACBCF8D8-BAB4-45CB-ABCF-58E48D7ABB18Q43905766-E97D86D8-DA68-4E0E-9FF7-79D533870957Q46005871-1ED96EDD-B16B-4630-A148-DEFE7A654C02Q47172000-5B03BD48-A77B-420A-A004-348F1AC5A3D9Q53081103-EA154A33-9C1D-4436-A910-287192DD9512Q57212763-3E890903-0536-4875-BB1D-A09D15A41DD0Q57252077-E572C9F5-787E-46FB-9716-47CECC226804
P2860
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2005 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
name
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@ast
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@en
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@nl
type
label
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@ast
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@en
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@nl
prefLabel
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@ast
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@en
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
@en
P2093
Mona Pache
Sonja Lautebach
Sonja Wilmsmeyer
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00417-005-1124-Y
P577
2005-03-09T00:00:00Z
P6179
1016748258