Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant.
about
Lenalidomide treatment for multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsFirst-line tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, a systematic review of controlled studiesAppraisal of immunoglobulin free light chain as a marker of responseCriteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myelomaSeven-year median time to progression with thalidomide for smoldering myeloma: partial response identifies subset requiring earlier salvage therapy for symptomatic diseaseHigh serum-free light chain levels and their rapid reduction in response to therapy define an aggressive multiple myeloma subtype with poor prognosisCarfilzomib/pomalidomide single-agent or in combination with other agents for the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma : a meta-analysis of 37 trialsEfficacy and Safety of Novel Agent-Based Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-AnalysisDeep Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical ReviewMonoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma: current status and future perspectivesInternational Myeloma Working Group consensus statement for the management, treatment, and supportive care of patients with myeloma not eligible for standard autologous stem-cell transplantationComparative efficacy of tandem autologous versus autologous followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsNew criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myelomaDoxorubicin and dexamethasone followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective well tolerated initial therapy for multiple myelomaCriteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working GroupGeneration of a predictive melphalan resistance index by drug screen of B-cell cancer cell linesProof of the concept to use a malignant B cell line drug screen strategy for identification and weight of melphalan resistance genes in multiple myelomaOutcome with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone followed by early autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma on the ECOG-ACRIN E4A03 randomized clinical trial: long-term follow-up.Response-adapted consolidation with bortezomib after ASCT improves progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Safety and tolerability of the antimicrobial peptide human lactoferrin 1-11 (hLF1-11)Trends in utilization and outcomes of autologous transplantation as early therapy for multiple myeloma.Impact of high-risk classification by FISH: an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) study E4A03.Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial"Real-world" data on the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were treated according to the standard clinical practice: a study of the Greek Myeloma Study Group.Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography for characterization and monitoring of extramedullary myeloma: comparison with serologic data.T cell progenitor therapy-facilitated thymopoiesis depends upon thymic input and continued thymic microenvironment interaction.Design and rationale of FOCUS (PX-171-011): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of carfilzomib versus best supportive care regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM)Outcomes with two different schedules of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) for previously untreated multiple myeloma: matched pair analysis using long-term follow-up data from the phase 3 VISTA and PETHEMA/GEM05 trials.Testing standard and genetic parameters in 220 patients with multiple myeloma with complete data sets: superiority of molecular genetics.Efficacy of single-agent bortezomib vs. single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic comparison.Alternate day pomalidomide retains anti-myeloma effect with reduced adverse events and evidence of in vivo immunomodulation.Thalidomide in combination with vincristine, epirubicin and dexamethasone (VED) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma.Risk factors and kinetics of thrombocytopenia associated with bortezomib for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma.A pilot study of bortezomib in Korean patients with relapsed or refractory myelomaLiposomal daunorubicin and dexamethasone as a treatment for multiple myeloma--the DD Protocol.Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.Bortezomib in combination with intermediate-dose dexamethasone and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for relapsed multiple myeloma.Bortezomib (Velcadetrade mark) in the Treatment of Multiple MyelomaPhase II trial of temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Lenalidomide as salvage therapy after allo-SCT for multiple myeloma is effective and leads to an increase of activated NK (NKp44(+)) and T (HLA-DR(+)) cells.
P2860
Q21133524-B0722B4B-F899-42DE-A542-4E14C8E7DE68Q24197999-96FE8411-169C-464D-8BE8-E74A6537AEBFQ24624398-24876C64-DD91-45AD-BBFF-510823C7EDCDQ24647620-CDA4F57B-C472-4944-BAE1-AF3136D7BD65Q24651269-E960135D-7557-49AB-8FCE-AC2C06569A30Q24670135-0960254A-10BA-4EB1-B244-87C6BD3F8C5CQ26741620-5B6FF11F-5189-4112-8CE2-A3F0A15CCDA7Q26767418-DBBFC30C-77A7-4B28-AD07-4ABD43F875B2Q26771228-1C15C709-CF15-4ADB-A31D-87A4BC198287Q26799104-3DF58414-30EC-4107-BD1E-50A9EAA29DA8Q27002668-AC076F3B-AFAA-4022-B08E-0D54636AB5BCQ27024932-62AF62B3-2197-4214-BE7B-F300C69FA938Q27027512-244B1E5D-4227-4D32-BF36-FF36DBEE9684Q28194391-F93CD779-23C1-4088-90E2-F0C9B2102F4BQ28207984-682CE202-B8E4-4783-AEEE-119D8CE77AC4Q28477988-79B1517C-A405-4E0D-8283-98B435853A1AQ28537857-68EFA9E8-0CD9-4530-BA11-E008D7827E64Q30276010-54A974F1-BF14-4EB0-A2F1-538FF3D55821Q30313340-8A667E8C-B0DE-4513-BD65-BCB2AEACE363Q30397259-3034E2D1-960A-42BA-8C1E-6F6FAC296D4BQ30409713-246D6C2F-5A9E-4F38-903A-2204DE432074Q30424188-106738B1-1D3F-4A51-B58D-E865512C0114Q30433139-B83202E6-01D0-4B38-92FC-C8C2A7E9631FQ30657752-DD5019AC-AD27-454C-AB57-21270365870CQ30669943-74226A7D-D6C0-4B42-9DCB-909E9044EFFAQ30851570-C84322C4-85C3-436C-9880-7896D2770C0BQ31094748-7DA30B92-5297-48F9-A4DC-6BC6F0CE5606Q31136560-614339A9-7155-46BC-A10E-9686988C1A2CQ33284138-253B53C6-4E0C-4F5C-8C8C-F1D62497677AQ33289791-8B13C3D7-9DBC-4E6C-8A69-F515B02D6E93Q33322921-BCD041DB-6D59-405F-9249-E2D100689801Q33364235-7491A786-93DF-44B8-B7DA-48B3FE02DE8BQ33367821-77448150-4916-4999-BFD6-E0BA357458DEQ33367833-F5330E27-22A6-4E6A-AD62-C40A9CA57D98Q33370094-60FCBFBA-A0B5-4254-BA8F-893FE0E4F2C9Q33374964-A33A1DFD-158C-4DA3-9E0B-C4C5CB9B9F36Q33375805-008E0443-8170-4C58-8B0F-7602D62C33A5Q33379044-03AC6324-D485-40A3-A46C-BC85B43CC5DAQ33383550-ECD8E6FA-DD64-45D5-9432-372E61E1E4AEQ33385308-EB7FC1F3-1AF6-40E5-819D-EBFC65D49C45
P2860
Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1998 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年論文
@yue
1998年論文
@zh-hant
1998年論文
@zh-hk
1998年論文
@zh-mo
1998年論文
@zh-tw
1998年论文
@wuu
name
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@ast
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@en
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@nl
type
label
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@ast
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@en
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@nl
prefLabel
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@ast
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@en
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Criteria for evaluating diseas ...... r Blood and Marrow Transplant.
@en
P2093
Apperley J
Björkstrand B
Jagannath S
P2860
P304
P356
10.1046/J.1365-2141.1998.00930.X
P407
P577
1998-09-01T00:00:00Z