Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
about
Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic reviewThe use of surrogate endpoints in regulating medicines for cardio-renal disease: opinions of stakeholdersWillingness to volunteer during an influenza pandemic: perspectives from students and staff at a large Canadian university.Prioritization strategies in clinical practice guidelines development: a pilot study.Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: patients' preferences and quality of collected data.Parents' attitudes towards hepatitis B vaccination for their children. A survey comparing paper and web questionnaires, Sweden 2005.Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers.Use of web and in-person survey modes to gather data from young adults on sex and drug use: an evaluation of cost, time, and survey error based on a randomized mixed-mode designSoftware version of Roland Morris Disability questionnaire for outcome assessment in low back pain.Patient organisations and the reimbursement process for medicines: an exploratory study in eight European countriesNonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data.Updating systematic reviews: an international surveyA within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris disability questionnaireUsing and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic reviewBarriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: a survey of early adopters.Use of a web-based questionnaire in the Black Women's Health Study.Dogslife: a web-based longitudinal study of Labrador Retriever health in the UKThe influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.Use of trial register information during the peer review processMeasurement of CPOE end-user satisfaction among ICU physicians and nursesUsing PhenX toolkit measures and other tools to assess urban/rural differences in health behaviors: recruitment methods and outcomes.Can the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score produce reliable results when used online?Survey says? A primer on web-based survey design and distribution.Nephrologists' perceptions of renal transplant as treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, preemptive transplant, and transplanting older patients: an international surveyWhat physicians from diverse specialties know and support in health care reformRed blood cell transfusion in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multidisciplinary North American survey.A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.How to assess a survey in surgery.Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled TrialThe use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: online vs. paper-and-pencil administrationA survey of prolapse practice in UK women's health physiotherapists: what has changed in the last decade?Comparison of Web-based and paper-based administration of ADHD questionnaires for adults.Frequency of adoption of practice management guidelines at trauma centers.International survey of nephrologists' perceptions and attitudes about rewards and compensations for kidney donation.Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.From malaria control to elimination in South Africa: The researchers' perspectives.Clinicians' perspectives on a Web-based system for routine outcome monitoring in old-age psychiatry in the NetherlandsIncentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.Socioeconomic deprivation and age are barriers to the online collection of patient reported outcome measures in orthopaedic patients.Considerations for conducting Web-based survey research with people living with human immunodeficiency virus using a community-based participatory approach.
P2860
Q26865837-20536A10-C397-4CBF-98BC-22F66A0F62D7Q28543430-974709E6-B55F-4A00-88E5-622C4450C21FQ30377237-9B49E026-ECE4-4FF0-843A-D418F679AF04Q30493916-01A065D8-C1AD-4E43-A09C-BB0C26431E31Q30866900-3FB49BDA-379C-4F09-BA80-DF9A5B6881F5Q33285077-D82D1972-B1EB-401C-93E9-AA71ABA2F35FQ33316193-882DB9E6-3DAF-4677-889B-53350B98EE20Q33386685-F5E2EB39-439E-431E-B6D5-6DCA78F9C25BQ33453652-867A9156-7C55-46FB-9677-427C53EC849DQ33532817-58CD04D3-5871-470B-AD1E-3B716606AAB8Q33533952-D281C4E3-3303-4D80-9509-B9BF7D4A750AQ33550793-D1BBA811-2768-4E24-A18E-98F18DE6277AQ33596993-3A18174C-F5CE-42FB-847B-01667324B11FQ33939062-4DF26621-628A-4EB0-853B-BF0E64E41788Q34447450-73621C76-7B46-49C2-BA65-604B948EC705Q34514203-4E68EACA-DC22-462E-9302-554EF08E56E9Q34554531-27630C0F-61DF-4CCA-9DA2-B40DBCE11403Q34667264-91150F97-0B86-47B7-BAB9-E3D48D205F9FQ34672550-5B38E7DF-7A6E-44F5-9920-EAC77771A16DQ34687138-5C86830F-BD06-4A67-972B-A8DE14D327CFQ34898220-EDBD31AA-AFDE-46BE-9D00-D98BA03DB0C7Q34981729-FA9AF96B-43B4-4896-9BC3-FEFF1E077459Q35072325-38A2DA79-CE7B-4EB2-AEC9-9515738B1316Q35157923-AC1BB9F3-1A00-410A-AA39-A267F448E9AEQ35359620-01B104D7-3967-4E53-9E14-B54DA58CE3FFQ35567259-D3C24557-8556-4291-B24E-997EADC116E7Q35567591-0DBA5D3B-E10C-49A9-A482-E4DAA4EB631DQ35614875-7705A624-41AD-4ECE-885C-1CCBAD97C63BQ36442273-6F5F246E-A2E9-4779-BF76-0142626B0483Q36483429-9FFE1A4C-919D-423F-92EA-460261492EEBQ36762293-F7A1CB1E-740F-4352-A1DE-2C4D5D7C3C7CQ36794754-DD9841D9-071B-48C4-8A52-2B4E5F86B298Q36934109-8BDAD4B9-EB40-421A-9C4E-F35E9E88ECB1Q36936619-52F5325A-FF3B-4983-AAFC-150BC4D64029Q36994839-E7E5B49A-7AEE-4679-AB8A-D73176A2D5AAQ37191969-27F9B76A-7F2D-4A27-A3CC-DC45F4357B6AQ37237184-288BD18A-4C4B-4B73-ADAB-201F46FC90F4Q37302112-06042422-2A5F-4A79-8ECD-CA6822599339Q37585244-DC9AE8C6-EAF6-4A49-946D-88B45C5E19A8Q37676354-C14EF08E-FF4A-42E3-ABDE-569458A26029
P2860
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2004 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
name
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@ast
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@en
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison
@nl
type
label
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@ast
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@en
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison
@nl
prefLabel
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@ast
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@en
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).
@en
P2093
Emil H Schemitsch
Marc F Swiontkowski
P J Devereaux
Sheila Sprague
P2860
P356
10.2196/JMIR.6.4.E39
P577
2004-10-29T00:00:00Z