Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study.
about
Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic reviewImpact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review.Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback.Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.Can poorly performing doctors blame their assessment tools?The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK.Utility of 360-degree assessment of residents in a Turkish academic emergency medicine residency program.Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness.Selecting graduates for the interns' award by using multisource feedback process: does it work?Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all?Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.A study of a multi-source feedback system for international medical graduates holding defined licences.
P2860
Q33573025-5F523DAA-670D-4114-B7DC-51D764BDE537Q33703459-0BFE718A-962D-4D54-81A8-02ED0FE830F8Q34332476-09E4A4B6-45D3-48C5-ABB8-3B52378B3774Q35463248-116D273F-6346-42BC-BBB9-651B62146243Q35916790-18539761-25F1-41D9-A87F-9002504B6E23Q35950818-EE148931-2BF1-47C2-A907-8D8A7AFFF81DQ36121545-1961123F-B307-4431-9FC8-C9BCA4659FA5Q37654479-B54255EC-6AD1-40F2-9A21-CC4B284C9734Q37709807-B7116BE9-7AC3-4A76-82D3-3BD224E67250Q39714168-8E557DB7-962F-48DD-A681-446FA6716F60Q43232342-74B396A6-A801-40C5-A400-1FF1DAE23025Q46047729-2524BD57-5BF7-4A6B-ADC1-2DBCED81F6FAQ47393740-DCE4D2D5-AD02-4FC0-9DB6-78E840537DEDQ48004134-01F5AD69-AD41-4249-A4CE-5C2F92ECD9DEQ53257874-8E3167F2-989F-4796-8605-BFFDB4BE8D84
P2860
Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@ast
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@en
type
label
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@ast
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@en
prefLabel
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@ast
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Responses of rural family phys ...... edback process: a pilot study.
@en
P2093
Donald B Langille
Douglas E Sinclair
Joan M Sargeant
Karen V Mann
Philip D Muirhead
Suzanne N Ferrier
Vonda M Hayes
P356
10.1097/00001888-200310001-00014
P407
P433
P577
2003-10-01T00:00:00Z