Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse.
about
Biomechanical, Topological and Chemical Features That Influence the Implant Success of an Urogynecological Mesh: A ReviewVarying degrees of nonlinear mechanical behavior arising from geometric differences of urogynecological meshes.Two-year outcomes after vaginal prolapse reconstruction with mesh pelvic floor repair system.Characterizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic prolapse mesh productsThe impact of boundary conditions on surface curvature of polypropylene mesh in response to uniaxial loading.Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh.Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes.Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading.The impact of prolapse mesh on vaginal smooth muscle structure and function.Extracellular matrix regenerative graft attenuates the negative impact of polypropylene prolapse mesh on vagina in rhesus macaque.Mesh in prolapse surgery: an imaging perspective.Effect of mesh width on apical support after sacrocolpopexy.Biodegradable scaffolds designed to mimic fascia-like properties for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.Muscle fragments on a scaffold in rats: a potential regenerative strategy in urogynecology.On the relevance of uniaxial tensile testing of urogynecological prostheses: the effect of displacement rate.Highly purified collagen coating enhances tissue adherence and integration properties of monofilament polypropylene meshes.Outcomes of trocar-guided Gynemesh PS™ versus single-incision trocarless Polyform™ transvaginal mesh procedures.Prosthetic Meshes for Repair of Hernia and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparison of Biomechanical Properties.In vivo biomechanical properties of heavy versus light weight monofilament polypropylene meshes. Does the knitting pattern matter?International guidelines for groin hernia management.Knot integrity using different suture types and different knot-tying techniques for reconstructive pelvic floor procedures.Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions.Surface orientation effects on bending properties of surgical mesh are independent of tensile properties.Native tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.Toward a new generation of pelvic floor implants with electrospun nanofibrous matrices: A feasibility study.
P2860
Q26744948-93AC02AD-6276-4756-91DE-D0F94E5E0D1CQ34031689-E9F8031D-2034-4E57-A5EE-4874D810EEFEQ34668019-099F4B50-21D1-4061-A0BE-7504B02678A2Q35997801-5349B99E-F0C1-47FE-A7D7-1BD28BC3C81CQ35997861-550C64A4-4F3D-47B4-AC94-DD914EE738D9Q36490517-F25CD907-A44D-4C0B-A636-2156724DC8FEQ36493063-1DF9C1A8-EE7E-49CA-92AA-C899E98FAFCDQ37509679-57C246E8-7228-4206-B2E4-8DF3B4E29467Q37509694-6B6DC49C-9A7A-4ED9-B1E8-FE9908495AF1Q37546048-A4095B6B-94D1-4B66-B112-D2557CCC52CEQ37622470-2063EBA8-700D-46B8-B954-6D70B1D6F94BQ38030885-46EF834B-A58F-4533-8FA3-8AD1BA4D5831Q39051518-8590C851-6A78-4769-98D2-CA4749177CDBQ39983055-704B65C9-0807-4484-9196-5004257A96D5Q40702509-C12F5F71-6D89-47FF-889B-DE9315EBC21EQ43883826-9312B62C-2950-48C6-809A-9F61F278B2C2Q45803922-34AF886E-B6EE-4530-97A3-28198862D1E0Q46059408-291DC67C-5B90-4D90-94DC-F8979E55907FQ46425900-499AF06A-6634-474F-B08B-8A52CC479B1EQ47356741-8E61A7BF-F1B2-44AE-B6E2-AA0305A42623Q47554006-F09EF0DB-0FAA-4C2C-8141-61CFA392B229Q47999974-71B0BECA-BD9C-42B9-B2FA-5215AB4E5B2FQ48107149-3A52C5BC-8BD2-443D-875D-4DDE829F3FC3Q48262965-B508B110-EF68-4AA8-B70F-9D0C56A319C7Q50222444-E48C6549-52C2-4F72-865F-99E5C8E3ED70Q50943556-2FB511D6-7A6A-4CA8-9E2A-D0CFEAEA79F4Q51537049-17B9CB55-764C-4C8C-9716-85738271EE54
P2860
Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
2011年论文
@zh
2011年论文
@zh-cn
name
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@ast
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@en
type
label
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@ast
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@en
prefLabel
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@ast
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... hes for pelvic organ prolapse.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Uniaxial biomechanical propert ...... shes for pelvic organ prolapse
@en
P2093
Andrew J Feola
Pamela A Moalli
Steven D Abramowitch
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00192-011-1616-8
P577
2011-11-26T00:00:00Z