Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
about
Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancerThe role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancerFive-point Likert scaling on MRI predicts clinically significant prostate carcinomaMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline.The role of imaging in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer.MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.Clinical applications of 3D T2-weighted MRI in pelvic imaging.Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI?Implementation of Multi-parametric Prostate MRI in Clinical Practice.PI-RADSv2: How we do it.Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate.Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.3-T in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy based on a scoring system for target lesions characterization.A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection.Multi-parametric (mp) MRI of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil.Multi-echo gradient recalled echo imaging of the pelvis for improved depiction of brachytherapy seeds and fiducial markers facilitating radiotherapy planning and treatment of prostatic carcinoma.Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumour variant unrecognized on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
P2860
Q26776478-A5B475EB-B7BF-4A21-B73E-B1CAFEE15226Q26849794-5C55BB0B-BE97-4BF7-B330-DF6BD4A15C51Q35763119-41A3B743-D1C9-47FA-B374-E8830547F5A9Q37377731-A10C93EF-8279-45FE-B63F-8CAF1CA8CCEDQ37708182-801481DA-F62E-4384-BDDB-7E1BA6A88963Q38141793-0D4DB065-7FE6-4E12-9393-6AC0F65B86E8Q38200928-EA8A04E7-F2DE-4AAD-B388-94853BDC1323Q38306633-747929EE-E5B2-4A6A-BE0D-7BEB72AA2867Q38528397-0CB0EB56-5B86-462F-BCFD-DBA7EE9C0591Q38753426-5C3F162A-579E-4D65-AC8F-E9366BE8E886Q38987379-97993712-2B7D-4465-ACAD-FA8CE82A26CFQ40079299-F554152A-6F0B-4E24-906F-1DD67D21F631Q40126185-6705607A-E4DF-434B-97FA-BEE2B7EC4E70Q43274222-26D3A359-C09D-43BD-BF26-745D45FE401DQ44776478-5B9F906C-D194-4444-8FCE-5BBAAB6C9E11Q53068125-84A33F3D-936B-4E4C-B426-48DE6BB4032EQ53623661-886F43A8-AA1C-4AEB-8EE1-B71747448546Q57101049-45C82E74-5B85-49B5-9743-15CBDAA2DE8A
P2860
Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@ast
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@en
type
label
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@ast
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@ast
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparison of pelvic phased-ar ...... al staging of prostate cancer.
@en
P2093
Bum Soo Kim
Eun Sang Yoo
Tae Gyun Kwon
Tae-Hwan Kim
P2860
P304
P356
10.3349/YMJ.2012.53.3.550
P577
2012-05-01T00:00:00Z