The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
about
Impact of surgical volume of centers on post-operative outcomes from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemoperfusionImproving quality through process change: a scoping review of process improvement tools in cancer surgeryAchieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004-2010The relationship between case volume, care quality, and outcomes of complex cancer surgery.Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.The risk of risk-adjustment measures for perioperative spine infection after spinal surgeryEffect of centre volume and high donor risk index on liver allograft survival.Quality measurement and improvement in general surgeryQuality Indicators but Not Admission Volumes of Neonatal Intensive Care Units Are Effective in Reducing Mortality Rates of Preterm Infants.Safety climate and readiness for implementation of evidence and person centered practice - A national study of registered nurses in general surgical care at Swedish university hospitals.Superior outcomes for rural patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair supports a systematic regional approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm care.Shop for quality or volume? Volume, quality, and outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery.Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study.Economic evaluations on centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a systematic review of methods.Implementation and effects of Germany's minimum volume regulations: results of the accompanying researchRisk-adjusted outcomes in Medicare inpatient nephrectomy patientsHealthcare quality measurement in orthopaedic surgery: current state of the artIn-hospital mortality after stomach cancer surgery in Spain and relationship with hospital volume of interventions.Disparities in selective referral for cancer surgeries: implications for the current healthcare delivery systemSystematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery.ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Coronary Artery Interventional Procedures: a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical CSurgical volume-to-outcome relationship and monitoring of technical performance in pediatric cardiac surgery.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: what lessons might we learn from volume and expertise?Impact of provider volume on operative mortality after radical cystectomy in a publicly funded healthcare system.Data sources and performance measurement.Bigger is bigger. Better is better.Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.Low-volume centre vs high-volume: the role of a quality assurance programme in colon cancer surgery.
P2860
Q26768302-2B6B1F96-4570-4A7C-A046-31EF93C53A59Q33957427-DCB58A3E-AF8E-48B8-8E9C-116EAF3E44B5Q34192751-39E1CC48-0A53-4B29-A7EA-A38E68914AEBQ34341516-E8DB4137-5B3C-454F-912E-9D12EB692F5BQ34734097-AE08BE44-85B9-42EA-AAEF-E62C011D46E2Q34785696-A7B7ACBD-5E88-4382-A9C0-7C1D3A15D61CQ35097597-45ED318D-8FE4-4863-A4A9-F6FCE9256D19Q35703333-252B405C-CEBF-4FAD-9E7C-E5E3C957E2CAQ36100174-27463162-B2C2-4ECC-9CCA-64B3EB8C352CQ36132009-FDC957AE-FA56-41BB-BC90-F4E3600875A1Q36174440-1791FB58-819B-4102-9F57-9F27A0589A10Q36198422-8C5AB478-4D26-476E-AF63-D0351D986D2EQ36585319-0B1930B6-E650-48B8-8467-7F90626BE2C8Q36883740-1278ED26-61CD-493C-9A09-F71F7910006EQ37210455-549BB3AB-0E15-4E56-B571-CCEA33825581Q37256998-35B983A1-A3DE-4D87-BFA2-726B72178481Q37350229-7447B3C1-F121-4157-BBAA-B6F11D1F4CFFQ37359573-3014C366-A8E9-4C85-84A7-E44A20F657D9Q37657379-59B7D73D-737D-4D79-9949-E74B921DD0EFQ37866213-73763416-D553-4662-917D-8E16269577D3Q38105058-27F170BC-FF87-47A6-9811-8AF4D6092892Q38217454-84375831-D0E8-4F71-BE48-6B72B0140060Q40105786-ADCB99BD-9186-4843-8B27-3106BC9EABEBQ41965520-621F5547-120D-4177-93ED-49864F25F370Q42566274-3D226D94-E41D-459F-8EBA-565DE1969250Q42736989-797EE29A-6E8D-410A-B693-E365B8858DBFQ43997503-306A0960-85AD-4B60-83C6-0C0A043A74CEQ51165899-9EE397E6-AA22-4BFF-B6DA-D89C72209C65
P2860
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@ast
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@en
type
label
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@ast
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@en
prefLabel
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@ast
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@en
P1476
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.
@en
P2093
Shukri F Khuri
William G Henderson
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00268-005-7987-6
P577
2005-10-01T00:00:00Z