Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.
about
Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscienceSingle-case cognitive neuropsychology in the age of big data.When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.Estimating the evidential value of significant results in psychological science.Sepsis reconsidered: Identifying novel metrics for behavioral landscape characterization with a high-performance computing implementation of an agent-based model.Targeting Next Generations to Change the Common Practice of Underpowered Research.Task-Dependent Behavioral Dynamics Make the Case for Temporal Integration in Multiple Strategies during Odor Processing.The central extended amygdala in fear and anxiety: Closing the gap between mechanistic and neuroimaging research.The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI.Cognitive and Neural Correlates of Mathematical Giftedness in Adults and Children: A Review.Ethical and Legal Implications of the Methodological Crisis in Neuroimaging.Intracranial source activity (eLORETA) related to scalp-level asymmetry scores and depression status.A Guerilla Guide to Common Problems in 'Neurostatistics': Essential Statistical Topics in Neuroscience.The anterior-ventrolateral temporal lobe contributes to boosting visual working memory capacity for items carrying semantic information.Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology.Registered Reports: introducing a new article format in Developmental Science.Identification of Two Distinct Working Memory-Related Brain Networks in Healthy Young Adults.Methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behavior.Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research.Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average ReliabilityOpinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - A systematic review.The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings.Dissociating frontoparietal brain networks with neuroadaptive Bayesian optimization.Redefine statistical significanceSimple changes of individual studies can improve the reproducibility of the biomedical scientific process as a wholeLISA improves statistical analysis for fMRISmall sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studiesThe Effect of a Head-mounted Low Vision Device on Visual FunctionBayesian Model Selection Maps for Group Studies Using M/EEG DataEstimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rateResponse to Ruby et al: On a 'failed' attempt to manipulate conscious perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation to prefrontal cortexA Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
P2860
Q29994537-A150BACE-8B22-4A31-9591-176ACE5B7A7CQ36374162-23042668-82A0-4C00-A70D-C0BC63574DC5Q38616823-949664CD-8C08-4AAF-9D69-F2FF21126109Q38618313-9AA471CF-32FA-4191-BFDB-7499F306671CQ38669414-94E528C2-7EB7-42D8-9E32-38AF24CA17E7Q40999247-9F8CF144-4F22-4896-A4E6-07B1805FD9B1Q42356251-9B61C11D-4530-4AC0-B76E-790390C0D3B5Q46092660-796DD9C4-7023-45D7-B2FB-1DE59DA7CBDDQ47104480-D9751AFD-D24D-4F48-8FFA-B1F03D09F8D9Q47116868-8D54BC4A-4E1D-46CA-B994-B97C1321636EQ47550953-FA628EE9-E606-468D-8E09-F64E17F6EBF4Q47741701-560D1244-FF8A-4350-B485-218DF74218A2Q47838790-AA32D0F8-3371-4C36-82C2-A0F74C66831AQ47889227-0771B175-6E63-4422-B069-E1B1C6E1E886Q48013566-900A2FA3-EB51-49AE-997A-F7D0749C19FFQ49543415-4FD4BC83-40D6-42A5-BC75-F22B75BD1E4CQ49724146-2CCCFF9C-3682-436A-9241-98F7285F110BQ49923105-D5E1D256-8F3B-4C6D-A90C-7A51C73FAD0FQ50047205-3C7CA029-2392-4CC4-B149-C100ED45DAF5Q51430192-59DAFA17-CCA9-4F5B-8BDD-71559FEE9020Q53274555-90B7D4B7-2C66-47AA-8571-5BE35A015957Q55008032-2355A60A-7A1A-463F-AF73-A185F3CD7C78Q55356134-00DD2178-744A-44A1-9322-47778CFED94FQ55418652-BB408BB8-70A6-42E5-8455-08C17626A50DQ56142179-F6B6B1EC-26FD-48ED-8F19-8A84C06A1123Q56990314-E5E24B9A-C618-4CD9-9EBA-D6C288F9B837Q57059887-1D954C26-D88D-4E03-8859-EE9A8B142F34Q57144281-C69B7DC5-71ED-46FC-8840-5C93599CF0DEQ57165727-5F378C8D-E3DC-42D7-B79A-4C058CB33307Q57821020-ED5DB5D1-D6E2-4455-8726-E6D479B72E9FQ58744983-0F638026-25B5-4FE1-A579-F7B9592629F7Q58790538-3DAAA71A-FD5E-4DEF-AFE3-96CDF36F8F93Q58799035-D2EF433F-6A9A-4BD2-B0CE-9C603598C153
P2860
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@ast
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@en
type
label
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@ast
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@en
prefLabel
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@ast
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Empirical assessment of publis ...... nce and psychology literature.
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.2000797
P407
P577
2017-03-02T00:00:00Z