Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
about
Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literatureVideo-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: keynote lectureLaparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directionsSurgical indications and optimization of patients for resectable esophageal malignanciesMinimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysisPredictors of Major Morbidity or Mortality After Resection for Esophageal Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model.Current management of esophageal cancerEndoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis with luminal apposition Axios stent (LAS) approach: a new concept for hybrid "Lewis Santy".Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial).Morbidity analysis in minimally invasive esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer versus conventional over the last 10 years, a single institution experience.The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: When and how?Minimally invasive esophagectomyMinimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies.Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution.Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centersReview of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies.Minimally invasive resection of synchronous thoracic esophageal and gastric carcinomas followed by reconstruction: a case report.Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges.Lymph node dissection in esophageal carcinoma: Minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open surgery.Optimal management of Barrett's esophagus: pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions.Multidisciplinary approach for patients with esophageal cancer.Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer.Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field)Predictive factors for post-operative respiratory infections after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcome of randomized trial.Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.Supracarinal dissection of the oesophagus and lymphadenectomy by MIERandomised trial, Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy versus open oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.The first randomised controlled trial on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and the ongoing quest for greater evidence.Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study.Robot-Assisted Mckeown Esophagectomy is Feasible After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Our Initial Experience.
P2860
Q26746249-658358A0-CDF8-43CF-99E1-0E98B785193FQ26748838-C2E3C5C2-2E09-4FFA-B9CA-CE9A19EDF181Q26766111-9281FE46-A890-4C57-A67F-EF106589CA72Q26861000-B28F948B-6342-47BD-99B6-9B54EA83DA82Q28076361-EDABB0EA-CD12-477B-A0FD-76166E49E5A3Q30276713-6A695ACA-20BD-41E8-8B00-3E98CC983FF8Q33658207-020FA4DE-9118-46EC-8D12-ABB5636CFD18Q33746561-A22DC0E1-7DB1-4623-95F3-B3DCAEE6BAFCQ33791252-6640E1B6-B687-43E6-B350-0C518FF71A7CQ33837985-FB403B2B-A178-4B55-AA89-C2753CDC002EQ33854596-3C56332B-D6E2-4877-BFF9-93A5C3BD3276Q34063704-F0166DDC-1D1A-451D-89E7-B250E499F49DQ34063715-449DBB78-FBBE-4B07-A9EF-A733FB9B1705Q34821244-206778A5-0B2E-4832-8DE4-837EABDB6546Q35077594-45D3683E-974D-4A07-9DBD-A201BCA92C0AQ35701804-B13CBF78-36AE-43CC-AB44-2C995BB0C501Q35833494-FA7E4E7E-4BBE-4D95-BFCE-04A87E963BF5Q36003705-F57B6085-5232-4CD8-8BA4-32225F3E3D24Q36165147-6C2A6548-6700-48BE-83F5-6B950724A109Q36564158-A81DE8EC-C3C6-4C88-BD6A-4C037C06BC44Q36818211-4B4B5CC1-CEC5-4A6D-93E1-E5EA1953343DQ36909259-2E2D9A74-A6C9-47AD-8380-16C79AA87A1CQ37967701-4DEA2390-EFDE-49CB-BD79-8D8A05116F44Q38067386-B54517C2-794F-4611-9ECE-BE127571737BQ38621214-53218057-F631-4E6F-AC8B-89398ECB0E65Q39265697-2C10A01D-4DA5-4FCD-8A7A-1AD0B7762825Q40090739-6AEF700F-AE4D-43F1-9927-91B0A7380045Q41099878-2B08548D-6A10-4447-8F5E-1A8D48590477Q41202575-88A0DD20-C238-41A5-B94A-6CDD05DCB43CQ41788397-17FE6143-91E9-4B07-9BE2-06EDFC11AA75Q42554531-E1983E1F-DB8F-4B54-B2CC-7F49F3A039EEQ47109626-3DC1FE4F-810C-4B36-AF73-21AB834ED794Q48180446-7E7F456B-BDDE-4706-B32D-648E9BDEDAB7Q52629359-6BE2D3CC-7998-49C9-94AC-FE658A82A3BB
P2860
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on April 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
type
label
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Minimally invasive versus open ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
van der Peet DL
P304
P577
2009-04-01T00:00:00Z