Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

about

Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41774707

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

@en

type

Item

label

Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

@en

prefLabel

Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

@en

P1476

Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

@en

P2093

Aaron C Moberly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Antoine J Shahin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jyoti Bhat

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm)

The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review

EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

Neurophysiology of spectrotemporal cue organization of spoken language in auditory memory.

Development of the N1-P2 auditory evoked response to amplitude rise time and rate of formant transition of speech sounds.

Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Amplitude rise time does not cue the /ba/-/wa/ contrast for adults or children

Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users.

Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature.

Measurement of mismatch negativity in individuals: a study using single-trial analysis.

P304

465-472

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1097/AUD.0000000000000257

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2015-12-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26655914

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4899308

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string