about
Colorectal cancer screening: why immunochemical fecal occult blood tests may be the best optionThe Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening.Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choicesA qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents' vaccination decision-making in the United KingdomIncidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysisImpact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trialA definition and ethical evaluation of overdiagnosis.Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation.A Community Jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening--a qualitative analysisAddressing health literacy in patient decision aids.Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals.A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making stylePsychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationshipsA decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey.Framing overdiagnosis in breast screening: a qualitative study with Australian expertsThe role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts.Ethnic minority women prefer strong recommendations to be screened for cancerCommunication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.Reconciling the principle of patient autonomy with the practice of informed consent: decision-making about prognostication in uveal melanoma.What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.A cluster randomised controlled trial of a web based decision aid to support parents' decisions about their child's Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccination.Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation.Enriching patient-centered care in serious illness: a focus on patients' experiences of agency.A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing.Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content.Primary goals, information-giving and men's understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors' varied communication about PSA screening.Beware dichotomies and grand abstractions: attending to particularity and practice in empirical bioethics.Offering informed choice about breast screening.Variation in health beliefs across different types of cervical screening non-participants.Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy
P2860
Q26997310-1CA29A83-7ABF-42C1-A6B1-F79F1B65D958Q27314872-C3CC181D-3B14-477D-8BED-E752D00339AEQ28075502-F571FCC6-9C00-4A2C-A91D-72EDF23A06ACQ28077190-74C54133-AB20-422E-BEFB-DE6097C7D962Q28255391-631B0446-2201-4A4C-BE0C-760A0249E6F2Q28752193-EB5FC499-F473-4A27-9897-5A6746264A84Q30390396-B2622B7A-2974-440B-B2CF-AEEAFAB51EE5Q30532790-5D1D93A8-4CAB-4AD3-BAA6-D37C444C9C95Q30540264-52E958CC-03F4-4E58-80C2-7F1C20E92679Q30577573-BE11E08A-C76C-46B2-BA4E-5C45BDD320F6Q30579681-F9E4EEE7-C3EC-4D8C-901A-EE2EB61235B9Q31098840-F2FB0D4A-444A-4AA7-8FCE-3CF6C723797AQ33576648-2A6D4996-49D0-4BA8-BAB8-2FDB61D82E0EQ33684754-DF84250A-9AB6-4426-BDD0-96E06BE8B4AFQ33834179-191B3464-38C7-4B30-9B40-F80F3DE4A80FQ33898754-2CA696C5-0832-4BBF-A7DD-50B80B15D037Q34246235-901F2DCC-1D4A-4F54-83C7-5D5AC0413C17Q35677860-004A7B99-F67A-47B2-948F-2A88F4B1D754Q35757874-B7E56C8C-E095-4A11-9B35-846AA58C06A0Q35813074-0C111620-95C6-43BF-B83C-FF8D4A74DF01Q36270318-1E6218B5-4681-423F-A8CD-0979FC12F39AQ36451775-A5B42301-2A97-430E-8D95-50D313EB707DQ36864134-378EBCF9-8BA9-4958-94FF-92F19E66F98EQ37332751-09BAD0EA-5CF4-4DE0-8BC3-FF761DA5740EQ37332915-63D35DCB-06E0-41AF-AB51-546AF4B1DC24Q37333165-621F924B-6BC2-4C75-8CE0-93C2CB63E0DDQ37502401-C19FFDAE-4245-4BAF-979B-38BA7F061770Q37630575-F9DF4E02-47EC-4E7D-84A7-2B7C94140F70Q39063097-CBF0D123-C7D0-4235-9900-EA1F5F7C655BQ40833971-F7FFF652-B319-4677-A871-64B3F7374415Q43506157-F8BA145F-989B-474D-A349-3BF48B91433FQ48181534-8BDC448A-70A2-4B04-9E0A-EF77BC4AB7DBQ48937087-D5EE8BD4-D3B7-483A-9C76-FE2AF1FF9994Q53082925-EF88419A-6AC7-4FA7-841E-370F1CF604F2Q53432102-9063EFFC-F7A8-489A-875C-366B774A74D3Q57391028-5BCC26D4-7596-4A15-95F2-95E5FFE9B2D7
P2860
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Communicating about screening.
@en
Communicating about screening.
@nl
type
label
Communicating about screening.
@en
Communicating about screening.
@nl
prefLabel
Communicating about screening.
@en
Communicating about screening.
@nl
P2093
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Communicating about screening.
@en
P2093
Glenn Salkeld
Kathy Flitcroft
P356
10.1136/BMJ.A1591
P407
P577
2008-09-22T00:00:00Z