Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
about
Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearingShifting Fundamental Frequency in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Listening: Effects of F0 Variation.Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulationThe Influence of High-Frequency Envelope Information on Low-Frequency Vowel Identification in Noise.Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulationInformation from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation.Comparing models of the combined-stimulation advantage for speech recognition.Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognitionReduced acoustic and electric integration in concurrent-vowel recognitionAchieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perceptionA model-based analysis of the "combined-stimulation advantage"Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorderPerceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulationEffects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structureEffects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearingEffects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear.Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing.A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearingCombined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
P2860
Q24600918-8C00EE33-A1A0-4717-AD8E-94FF60E4FF65Q27022170-89918C65-2D18-4881-A269-B936FA32F5DCQ28744616-7541DB66-A78D-4334-8288-7CCFC531C571Q30357590-38F17480-33EC-4ABB-8CFB-2BA64D6BC22CQ30359772-3BC56F7C-FAA4-45B7-8690-D42DC3EC34FDQ30366710-F0B7E71E-A240-4891-8617-A5E40459B39CQ30384672-69E2A77E-1CEC-4B3D-8FE6-175C1E8E309FQ30393879-3D78DE5A-B6D6-4388-949F-D44018C43F70Q30409488-8A56864F-B369-4CF3-8372-0BAEA774C7D3Q30418720-63A88E70-F5B0-4D5B-9508-AF1654CEC935Q30419862-0C1D05BB-5F0A-4C5C-9CB7-EE014A7F1F9AQ30442263-658F45D2-BD13-4B8E-BF3A-0D39EA39FF8AQ30447272-13C14019-84D5-448B-A0ED-7359A490EDA9Q30447704-F0DE8433-3C5B-4D6F-A57C-1FAB9FC2B95BQ30453439-DFC15FBC-54AC-489C-A029-6D4778EEC68AQ30455003-E796DD30-637A-49AC-A450-A1C4B059C2D9Q30455849-9885FC72-EFD7-4425-96F7-61E50AF70A1BQ30457517-847C03BF-879D-4369-B460-72A35DDF18B3Q30457854-32437AAE-C525-4A26-9AE3-523CF7FDFF6EQ30459525-A951E34C-F2DB-4E50-B292-1D3470703306Q30460280-C4B00BC9-09C3-4A72-952D-A66FBF3A5127Q30462957-6F67CF5F-8733-479F-A3F2-A8FF98722B69Q30465525-2C692DC0-AC03-42C6-8ADB-3C441DA5D661Q30466146-560E04CE-FF81-4A3F-BD5D-23241179C842Q30467157-4D1349A5-3A8B-4B1E-A64C-CBEAC7898E9CQ30467995-6483A2E4-D653-428F-8D26-3408971A40EDQ30470044-6751F051-3E47-4F97-8A98-460800A5323DQ30470891-6E9D2CDA-301E-4F57-8087-3FA8F9B13FB7Q30470965-E0622F48-6D50-4EC5-8829-E498CC4C87E2Q30471034-D9F8F5E1-989F-466D-B829-0F8AA8D93CF7Q30474307-797AB556-A8EA-4B54-9118-D9952A87DA75Q30474309-C72B0518-991F-4E3F-9C95-D04AC7569491Q30474925-C0148F01-C3FF-462E-9F5C-D6B8606BB6ECQ30475647-85E77761-2472-4034-AE5E-D216938EB985Q30476023-CDBF1728-5BD0-405A-BC72-3D4BF47977FAQ30477231-6581E305-D8E0-4422-B2E6-E0FA0BFA0BD7Q30482931-1512BE4C-7005-4780-9B90-B5F3136417FBQ30489605-7D882B2F-35A3-4C82-ABCD-9B3BCC42FE8FQ38903310-904D3DDF-013B-4D09-B023-763195B0DD8CQ41247434-DE4CA26F-5262-45F3-BF29-239DA208F6FF
P2860
Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@en
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@nl
type
label
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@en
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@nl
prefLabel
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@en
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@nl
P356
P1476
Improved speech recognition in ...... stic and electric stimulation.
@en
P2093
Ying-Yee Kong
P304
P356
10.1121/1.2717408
P407
P577
2007-06-01T00:00:00Z