A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
about
ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical imagesAn experimentally validated micromechanical model of a rat vertebra under compressive loadingA finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact.A new method for the automatic mesh generation of bone segments from CT data.Automatic segmentation of medical images using image registration: diagnostic and simulation applications.The influence of data shape acquisition process and geometric accuracy of the mandible for numerical simulation.Finite element analysis of osteosynthesis screw fixation in the bone stock: an appropriate method for automatic screw modellingQuantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.IA-FEMesh: an open-source, interactive, multiblock approach to anatomic finite element model development.Mechanical testing of bones: the positive synergy of finite-element models and in vitro experiments.Patient-specific finite element modeling of bones.From Finite Element Meshes to Clouds of Points: A Review of Methods for Generation of Computational Biomechanics Models for Patient-Specific Applications.Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.Development and numerical validation of a finite element model of the muscle standardized femur.Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur.Hexahedral meshing of subject-specific anatomic structures using mapped building blocks.In vitro and in silico characterization of open-cell structures of trabecular bone.Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants--a comparative study.Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia.A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements.Load-adaptive scaffold architecturing: a bioinspired approach to the design of porous additively manufactured scaffolds with optimized mechanical properties.Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments.HR-pQCT-based homogenised finite element models provide quantitative predictions of experimental vertebral body stiffness and strength with the same accuracy as μFE models.Mechanical strength of a femoral reconstruction in paediatric oncology: a finite element study.Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strengthening Clinically Useful?
P2860
Q24803793-623567AA-8C6B-44FB-9BF6-7000D557F6B5Q28742734-6B0CE1B6-F9D6-4B89-8E4A-C43B09A14FF0Q31081021-C299F7DD-900F-4339-8617-0F49D797B13FQ33178483-8CD00F44-96AD-4BB7-B2C6-01664492FD83Q33213526-281E00E0-9896-47D6-9499-186145BA9288Q33748718-8509724B-6B09-4166-ADEE-A36EFF999667Q34217510-03A71DA4-8014-4663-BDA2-5EFCC37C44E3Q34919674-A959BAB5-69FA-467E-B64C-DF89E4C8AFE7Q37266001-A7DA0E80-E92B-4F7E-9BD0-73F31C35348DQ37741580-136D03E0-D837-4066-A35A-23114E74F0D3Q38103524-8EBC00CC-25C3-4167-B17F-AF6D2F82A646Q38596279-260B1471-1955-4317-9386-5025EC3A5A97Q38974691-4E230D5A-92F4-4B88-B688-DA6EEA5BD2FFQ40581340-FB5C3CAC-DB59-4AA3-A421-77409D139D97Q42124741-F61C2E19-FE2A-4B88-B8DA-61A302EA7E84Q43589420-0E54D6D3-CE32-4779-B2D3-26DA204FEF76Q45328101-CC7B2088-47AA-4F8D-8CD3-32A13BD34B7FQ47370109-8B40DB0F-6BD5-4674-B13F-E39C6DE2E95DQ47850661-D79F89F6-977E-4603-B391-71DD4FD1BDF5Q50906378-85743548-EE5B-409B-BCE9-50CF06D05510Q50992544-BA10F505-8ABD-4BEF-8E4E-1124BE0B3BEFQ51083503-EACB4176-BF36-46E0-A0D3-0C3173384801Q51170386-263C0B9E-96FF-4E2C-BD8E-545FC6621F2FQ51491329-854AE329-EFBA-4F3E-A828-86DAC05E27B9Q53214424-BE34EA2D-ABA8-44E1-8C80-7C8B3ED5FD19Q53232385-4C873CBB-49A5-4164-B2A9-027D876C9874Q53770874-4E5ABDFB-B652-4105-A394-3E484A0C1A84Q55129561-70B2396D-22EF-478E-BE86-F4A5171C6678
P2860
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年学术文章
@wuu
1998年学术文章
@zh
1998年学术文章
@zh-cn
1998年学术文章
@zh-hans
1998年学术文章
@zh-my
1998年学术文章
@zh-sg
1998年學術文章
@yue
1998年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@en
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@nl
type
label
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@en
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@en
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
@nl
P1476
A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs
@en
P2093
P356
10.1016/S1350-4533(97)00049-0
P577
1998-01-01T00:00:00Z