Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
about
The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeonsCitation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysisHow publishing in open access journals threatens science and what we can do about itAssessing Individual Intellectual Output in Scientific Research: Mexico's National System for Evaluating Scholars Performance in the Humanities and the Behavioral Sciences.A bibliometric search of citation classics in anesthesiology.The Impact Factor: time for change.100 classic papers of interventional radiology: A citation analysis.Bibliometric analysis of the top 50 cited respiratory articles.Recent trends in biomedical informatics: a study based on JAMIA articles.New indices in scholarship assessment.The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years.The 100 Most Influential Papers in the Field of Thrombolytic Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis.Bibliometric profile of deep brain stimulation.Knee Society Award Papers Are Highly Cited Works.Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses.H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis.Citation classics from Indian pediatrics.Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social and personality psychology.Top 50 Highly Cited Articles on Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) in Abdominal Radiology: A Bibliometric Analysis.Top 100 Cited Articles in Recent Tobacco Research.Are methodological quality and completeness of reporting associated with citation-based measures of publication impact? A secondary analysis of a systematic review of dementia biomarker studies.Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2010 and 2016: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties.Domain analysis in information scienceNot all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaborationA comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizationsThe top-cited wetland articles in science citation index expanded: characteristics and hotspotsHallmark of success: top 50 classics in oral and maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomographyCorrelation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisIntroduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauriThe construct validity of the h-indexArts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please, just dataCitation counts in transportation research
P2860
Q21254609-9203BD4E-B82A-44CE-91B2-5025F15669A8Q24273414-EB5979AE-7D18-4200-B5D0-DD6BE40C5978Q28075811-875244DE-15FD-449D-8EB5-4C5450E0545DQ28951026-EF0DFF37-8FC2-45F7-983D-507437E444FDQ30388252-CDDB4DB5-143E-467D-809C-DBB4238E2F71Q34093982-3B3FC641-C6C1-42B8-A231-EB0F369D3ABAQ34364883-8028B18C-90C5-402B-A501-85615665A296Q35501123-8EEBE696-8B7F-47BE-B27B-6EFAFF1F3AAEQ35829303-40D7F680-DFC5-4614-BD0C-7F4754C6F82FQ37389474-E798CD25-DC31-45B3-9425-896BC19F8C00Q37626447-E8362609-5DBE-4E0B-BA88-1B1599B15D7CQ38530883-3E8906B1-2452-4FE2-BF92-334ECBA8AF3BQ38738763-3049F1B5-DFD3-4119-AE1C-3380B3586E8FQ38798817-07F8E89F-B20A-4E3A-AB68-9C28A7D95FF4Q39002392-7939901F-A29B-449A-B621-B9E59E918601Q42654732-66ECB698-4C47-4757-BB17-8B4DD7A3F6F1Q43913388-CC242BB7-4AA0-4161-94A2-C4DFB95961ACQ44981746-444DC642-FDD0-4672-945B-7646BEAE2918Q47368364-CC78E038-C2AF-4EFD-8432-F783A584723BQ52587200-0334D51A-A1AB-4ED0-BE71-10C5515B602AQ53602097-8637D4B5-4AC2-4B4D-9A5A-F51C6A795AAEQ53835370-EF5C90CC-D93F-4DBE-A368-D4EF660DBD04Q55403178-5E3CAA24-5881-464E-A804-31A73B34F34CQ55992664-F3C7A0BE-A491-479E-A628-978F6ACC3AC7Q56220079-64DA6803-28CF-4BBB-8C17-E5433384BA6FQ56220134-ECD5BE58-2827-45B7-B223-63E67DABCF4FQ57318945-359AE648-1B65-4A7A-B9F4-6482977D0316Q57646803-F252A5E8-1806-4B46-80BA-2C52DF37CF3DQ57678728-1B8A2421-7BC3-4894-94E8-AF51D482D4BBQ58629326-4F9A22CE-EDAC-4F95-ACEB-612B8D6D42ABQ58631267-13958CEB-AE29-4692-9FEF-E85BB36269F9Q58631875-A7D1C139-1C99-4EA8-AA3E-2BE3F5A351B8Q59322073-1A8ED68A-95DC-4248-BAA0-21704486996A
P2860
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年学术文章
@wuu
1998年学术文章
@zh
1998年学术文章
@zh-cn
1998年学术文章
@zh-hans
1998年学术文章
@zh-my
1998年学术文章
@zh-sg
1998年學術文章
@yue
1998年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@en
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@nl
type
label
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@en
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@nl
prefLabel
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@en
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.3109/17453679809000920
P577
1998-06-01T00:00:00Z