about
Expert failure: re-evaluating research assessmentThe academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based reviewThe N-pact factor: evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical powerIncreasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical researchHow open science helps researchers succeed.The natural selection of bad scienceAuto-correlation of journal impact factor for consensus research reporting statements: a cohort studyTowards an open science publishing platformF1000Research: Tics welcomes you to 21st century biomedical publishingSpecialized science“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellenceOpen-access mega-journalsDoes an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland.New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy.Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impactA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewImplications of Web of Science journal impact factor for scientific output evaluation in 16 institutions and investigators' opinion.I publish in I edit?--Do editorial board members of urologic journals preferentially publish their own scientific work?Every scientist is a memory researcher: Suggestions for making research more memorable.Network-driven reputation in online scientific communitiesSignificance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.The innovative medicines initiative: a public private partnership model to foster drug discovery.Causes for the persistence of impact factor maniaModelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review.Striving for improved visibility and increased citation through coverage by PubMed Central (PMC)Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size.The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable researchWeb 2.0 and academic debate: Social media challenges traditions in scientific publishing.Imagining the "open" university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education.The ZMA and the impact factor.A new editor-in-chief for Nicotine & Tobacco Research.Impacted science: impact is not importance.A taxonomy of motives to cite.In response to Bales (2014).Citations and science.Balancing family with a successful career in neuroscience.Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average ReliabilityPromoting reproducibility in addiction research.Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.Reproducibility Issues: Avoiding Pitfalls in Animal Inflammation Models.
P2860
Q21563534-98C7D518-C6B2-487B-AA5C-FA3224ED76FCQ24049929-6F98072D-023D-474B-ABF0-AAAC174C3C3EQ24288678-A0EC8037-A482-41D0-A02E-DF64A9717B02Q24289253-9BB46D95-1EF2-46EE-B7F8-325D5E730613Q27313486-1F272E6A-7917-4CD0-99AA-4CF0A5CCD536Q27333717-50EC40F0-B780-458E-BF74-E124D14BE771Q28601029-C3E80C1E-CC2B-4E30-8B8F-5D3B639784EAQ28603680-8EAEB2C8-93D9-42FB-B63F-AE0F0428D090Q28652460-E3C8511C-D1E4-4760-9AD4-E4E1FA5A5752Q28659755-F97B018B-8464-415D-97A4-E3CD40AE52C8Q29017249-116F2283-88D0-4CD8-94ED-4CF03FA440CCQ29958791-2E319555-12F9-4352-8C74-8B123A8C6EE8Q30359530-880BD522-AC4E-497D-ACC9-07F949B39210Q30395750-4B84762B-5977-4491-A7F5-D9B7E41C7EA9Q30486792-48E23C23-E910-43AE-BBD4-64A773D7F891Q33269085-77A4B077-CED0-4AE6-A785-C27DC1B97ACEQ34633817-54893870-354C-4290-9BBA-933C00DF6BFDQ35080585-0458B89F-AB8E-414C-8BC1-3448CE98D35DQ35173312-F37594ED-6F1A-418C-9B4B-005471C08EDAQ35477918-40E8E2BB-CA0D-4D12-835C-A31AAF1C0AE0Q37130633-B515C989-0D94-452D-8DE6-05C5745993E1Q37655104-67C88E6B-1C8A-4E5B-B480-14AA148FE3B3Q37667976-AB6F5028-461B-4860-A3E2-DD1E596FADCCQ38168642-E4403A95-2C5A-495A-8107-01084130A24DQ38284688-89E7C254-16EA-4B21-825D-FB29A9C31C26Q38661305-34F5B5D4-7099-4137-AECF-F108B6077A0CQ38683193-8B114F56-D76F-4529-8C7E-E968E038FBA6Q41932623-79937DA9-3FAB-4CAF-AD70-3E6F13F6659EQ42183997-4FD62922-93A5-4CDA-A1C4-A6A2703D0604Q42643141-952F63B6-3EEA-4692-98CF-02E6EC76F301Q42879270-0BC617D1-D0FA-4383-B82E-4EFBA803B41CQ43202067-CB4AD427-C0F7-4FD0-86E8-51FC41001888Q43951883-8E74351F-0031-4D5C-8CB5-5BA199610C47Q45011515-0E359E29-1CC1-4B63-9703-2ADD19463389Q48337433-CA82C898-A6E7-4130-AB8C-453586CBF53DQ48509549-0C7D7DAA-529F-48BB-B675-32F0C7573423Q51430192-197FFF72-54E1-41AD-A72E-B92BE1370FC9Q52313130-E1AE5572-020C-4361-8221-BE195C366ABBQ52622119-F77A356D-5451-4CBA-BF70-C742A6665A8AQ54246308-E8B3A21B-DCAE-4577-BAE3-754037ED4B5C
P2860
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@ast
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en-gb
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@nl
type
label
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@ast
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en-gb
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@nl
prefLabel
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@ast
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en-gb
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@nl
P2860
P50
P3181
P356
P1476
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
@en
P2093
Marcus Munafò
P2860
P3181
P356
10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00291
P407
P577
2013-06-24T00:00:00Z