Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q23048188

about

Telemedicine: are we advancing the science?Increasing User Involvement in Health Care and Health Research Simultaneously: A Proto-Protocol for "Person-as-Researcher" and Online Decision Support Tools Screening Coverage Needed to Reduce Mortality from Prostate Cancer: A Living Systematic Review Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review Zika Virus Infection as a Cause of Congenital Brain Abnormalities and Guillain–Barré Syndrome: Systematic Review Live cumulative network meta-analysis: protocol for second-line treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor Modern medicine comes online: How putting Wikipedia articles through a medical journal's traditional process can put free, reliable information into as many hands as possible How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3).Monitoring mortality in forced migrants--can Bayesian methods help us to do better with the (little) data we have?Systematic review automation technologies.The use of systematic reviews and reporting guidelines to advance the implementation of the 3Rs.Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?A large-scale assessment of temporal trends in meta-analyses using systematic review reports from the Cochrane Library.When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish.Producing Cochrane systematic reviews-a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation and improvement.A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making.Planning future studies based on the precision of network meta-analysis results.Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.Report from the kick-off meeting of the Cochrane Skin Group Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN).Expert Search Strategies: The Information Retrieval Practices of Healthcare Information Professionals.The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?Twitter-Based Journal Clubs: Additional Facts and Clarifications.Optimising the value of the evidence generated in implementation science: the use of ontologies to address the challenges.Analysis of the evidence-practice gap to facilitate proper medical care for the elderly: investigation, using databases, of utilization measures for National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB).Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics.The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map.Sexual transmission of Zika virus and other flaviviruses: A living systematic review Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: a systematic review of systematic reviews Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization A probabilistic automated tagger to identify human-related publications

P2860

Q24186885-11710960-DAF5-4831-9EF8-5C024FB7B300 Q24273402-3E92863D-B51F-4333-BC3E-E111366E61E6 Q26748873-219C86F7-4D02-46D3-A75F-FD0FF71F8270 Q28085128-17DC41EE-5926-4F8D-84E9-70D8FAC7443E Q28114477-38D01B5C-7B07-4489-B9DD-A95A9DC495CF Q28597805-7976C851-9535-4B37-9419-8FE795B0C1B4 Q28651503-56830034-5DDA-487F-94F7-B9CC4B4BF91F Q30394805-C6A97D4E-5EE7-49B1-9C5F-97F3A25F6259 Q31008727-85DDAE43-09D3-4450-A2D7-A53D35F17D7B Q33910187-1966E4F0-4DD9-4DF3-AF7C-121784A92362 Q35244647-87E32F0A-2781-4D91-BA4B-22D8C77F3C3E Q35899612-81338DAA-6077-47F1-A474-0EAEAA00A346 Q36276258-09F1CF6E-FCA4-483D-8F9A-B02B50D49366 Q36368781-1A6D3B62-CEB4-47A5-81D4-049BE71D7E26 Q37114403-6CE4A0E0-FE1C-4E3D-AF23-0D07874899FE Q37278474-D310B8AF-6038-4960-9030-58552287DDD2 Q38651254-99EB1050-867D-4512-B6DF-AB63979F42E6 Q38761251-C7139209-8E11-473C-95EC-874999BD5D50 Q38825084-141BBDC0-17E4-4D6C-8AC6-3415F41E17B1 Q38976783-3F33992C-5EB7-4500-99D9-0CC07B610AD7 Q40040285-CF4674A6-8E9E-4CE7-B1B9-B36A0E7BBBE0 Q40968887-BBD5CB2F-BF85-4AD0-A216-B83CA13C98A1 Q42379121-103BC1DC-4139-4BB2-8A0F-07D218530E20 Q42672434-73760580-2A29-4DD5-BE30-E59682F077D0 Q42928131-F48B6D3C-24B7-465C-BA39-C50544AACDAF Q43178792-9D0F5227-78D0-49C2-B399-27017D58CE14 Q44973989-F2A3EC34-5F63-420A-9150-D78B675A9B9F Q47098998-A6CAA3AC-9731-406B-8DE2-C12EDFA7F7D3 Q47159405-26DE6656-21EE-4E75-854C-D74C6AB5921D Q50350210-8C2B6F17-EAD3-4D40-A35B-5FA758002625 Q52563098-01D31732-3DE1-4B70-BA39-8CF4E45146ED Q55426553-338ACA99-F722-4107-81D9-BD5485933CDE Q56344087-6D956E5D-0F85-437F-AE1D-A18A1E136E94 Q57821898-CD5CC7CE-481F-4E5D-9534-FBA49EBF2BF8 Q57921978-1B54ECE9-AA82-4CE4-B965-A478662E19DF Q58743083-52213D69-354B-4048-AB43-24CF7840F4E6

P2860

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q23048188

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2014 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年論文

@yue

2014年論文

@zh-hant

2014年論文

@zh-hk

2014年論文

@zh-mo

2014年論文

@zh-tw

2014年论文

@wuu

name

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@ast

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en-gb

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@nl

type

label

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@ast

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en-gb

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@nl

prefLabel

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@ast

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en-gb

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@nl

P1433

Q23048188-0F82C97B-6D9C-4A67-BD24-D159B7DACD85

P1476

Q23048188-E64E2718-4CF9-4837-B989-63F7D68E6AE7

P2093

Q23048188-0279EC43-B7E5-4321-B4DB-ACF844FFD5D1

Q23048188-14D4AEB4-CAF4-48F2-B09A-E66EC4B54AD2

Q23048188-55F07668-B242-48E8-838E-A22A366DEC8F

Q23048188-6ECA15A0-0CC6-47D4-BD47-4EE83B2520C5

Q23048188-82429100-6DA6-4A45-A89D-15FB52BC41EE

P2860

Q23048188-09C38BFF-0A32-4135-ACF0-5DA732F22741

Q23048188-0FCE3B16-F197-4FD3-A754-89D88F88760B

Q23048188-1121E3C6-8C75-42C2-BBF8-B72E868B1608

Q23048188-33FD70AB-9B55-49D1-81BA-B3C0B1BFAE06

Q23048188-3726280B-B447-4231-B3A0-00D56D5180A1

Q23048188-3ABA7DE8-261F-4892-BD9F-E36DFA1334C0

Q23048188-3EC4B016-D1BD-4CE6-B5A2-2ED6C1D94E3C

Q23048188-484A29E5-5F58-45DC-9628-7433BEC23191

Q23048188-507A5242-DFC3-4AA4-83B4-D9F5CE25A91A

Q23048188-519B4DB2-A1B2-468D-89F8-7CE2A9B7B1E6

P304

Q23048188-5DE4EBE0-747A-4872-82E0-AC677970B0A2

P31

Q23048188-CB655E55-9599-480F-909D-532861FD10AD

Q23048188-DE0DED41-9432-4427-9762-2FA42937C331

P3181

Q23048188-9ED43767-DC2D-4ED9-B3AD-8CF42905E63D

P356

Q23048188-5788F3B1-05F1-4966-ADB5-FBFE2C641548

P407

Q23048188-916C6668-6BAA-4F84-8DCA-7F5EBE25A2CC

P433

Q23048188-D18898C1-AAE3-45D4-9579-C3EBADFEDF0B

P478

Q23048188-C15B3181-50B7-4613-AB3D-B223B7381A05

P50

Q23048188-AA2DEF51-4A48-4D35-AC47-28B3AF1FB6DA

Q23048188-B8D50E6E-53EB-4C10-A0F2-855B3B8D9978

P577

Q23048188-837D3A5F-2659-4919-B3F6-02CC93E59144

P5875

Q23048188-EAF007A6-E893-4663-98BC-37CC8D04A815

P698

Q23048188-17DACBEE-1A90-4720-B3C7-8392523E0F6A

P932

Q23048188-27A21137-0B2D-4E2C-9002-F5F6C974091B

P3181

P356

JOURNAL.PMED.1001603

P1433

P1476

Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

@en

P2093

Chris Mavergames

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

James Thomas

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Julian H Elliott

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ornella Clavisi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Russell L Gruen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

The value of data

When and how to update systematic reviews

How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis

Research Glut And Information Famine: Making Research Evidence More Useful For Policymakers

A comparison of statistical methods for identifying out-of-date systematic reviews

Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making

PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility

P304

e1001603

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

systematic review

P3181

2367514

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001603

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

11

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2014-02-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

260372202

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24558353

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3928029

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string