Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
about
In search of justification for the unpredictability paradoxBig data in healthcare: are we close to it?Beta-lactam plus macrolides or beta-lactam alone for community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysisRandomized controlled trials: still the backbone of vascular surgery?Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPerspective: the challenge of clinical decision-making for drug treatment in older people. The role of multidimensional assessment and prognosisPredictive accuracy of amyloid imaging for progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease with different lengths of follow-up: a meta-analysis. [CorrectedLong-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The LOC-1 Study.E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysisA review of routinely collected data studies in urology: Methodological considerations, reporting quality, and future directionsEvidence synthesis and decision modelling to support complex decisions: stockpiling neuraminidase inhibitors for pandemic influenza usageAdding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological surveyAtomic data: James Mackenzie Lecture 2015.[Pain registries and similar data collections : A systematic review].Antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical approach.Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP), in patients with metabolic risk factors. A 6-month follow-up study in primary health careDescriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013.Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews.Risk of community-acquired pneumonia with outpatient proton-pump inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy.Oral bisphosphonate use and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer.Circumcision as a primary HIV preventive: extrapolating from the available data.Statin Treatment and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Frail Older Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Observational Study.Comparing effectiveness with efficacy: outcomes of palliative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in routine practice.Reproducing a Prospective Clinical Study as a Computational Retrospective Study in MIMIC-II.Comparison of Estimates between Cohort and Case-Control Studies in Meta-Analyses of Therapeutic Interventions: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.Association between guideline recommended drugs and death in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: population based cohort study.Is long-term use of benzodiazepine a risk for cancer?Temporal relationship between dysthymia and temporomandibular disorder: a population-based matched case-control study in TaiwanTreatment of Hypertensive Patients with a Fixed-Dose Combination of Bisoprolol and Amlodipine: Results of a Cohort study with More Than 10,000 Patients.Co-ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin in the Treatment of Cerebral Ischemia: from Rodent to Man.Testing a machine-learning algorithm to predict the persistence and severity of major depressive disorder from baseline self-reports.Using patient self-reports to study heterogeneity of treatment effects in major depressive disorder.Dysthymia increases the risk of temporomandibular disorder: A population-based cohort study (A STROBE-Compliant Article).A systematic literature review on the efficacy-effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs.Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people.When and how can real world data analyses substitute for randomized controlled trials?A 'reluctant' critical review: 'Manual for evidence-based clinical practice (2015)'.Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
P2860
Q21203729-F4D93ED9-3AB8-44A0-A101-FC118E7F6661Q24273263-08EB4C36-D39D-41CC-9952-E7A28D0AA5C2Q26747529-DC5B6D13-E3E2-4DAA-9911-9C8D86C9D2FDQ26768569-73541B85-42D2-4F96-8B5B-C861266E7E10Q26799494-DE526E4A-A0B0-4D72-915E-CC144F68A863Q26991999-D3E4D7A1-7AA3-4475-B5CF-8AE7A73036FEQ27007436-AEEFA4B2-6999-4D4B-86D0-FFA46E2F1EF4Q27312532-685B2C05-96C2-4646-93FE-59001D9B4821Q28272129-70385DD7-0803-4B9E-928E-DD29D34B87FFQ29994492-4FD369E9-A47C-4152-BCA9-D14B388DBC69Q30401118-672FA951-AFA4-4D98-B055-71B9081EE929Q30825274-215B65C5-1923-4B5E-824A-2B5CB9AA8D81Q31043715-C3201103-2BEC-4F92-9254-4095382C5F2CQ31087371-0A21196F-CB31-4BA4-BD77-483EBBD01A25Q31111109-A8958BE8-F802-4022-AFAF-89237C029DF1Q33427274-6F3BF990-5052-4F18-9510-5B3A3FBB054AQ33558080-7C71499B-6BDD-45CA-B2E8-1152112A885DQ33892497-4D412A52-C8A2-4F28-BDA6-BFFFAE5FCB5CQ34047368-A0514D0F-C133-492A-8691-562317DD5451Q34479280-39FAF4C2-271B-4DB3-A237-8BCFE41BD5E1Q34884548-4EAFF8BA-E6BE-4096-B2E2-7F0EDB224DC1Q35215054-DEC7464F-0F2C-4A44-829C-7AB951078DCFQ35575111-30EAA70C-F4BB-4C25-A542-5F19CD900536Q35674469-3C7C19C3-D821-437C-A32E-75454627FA7CQ35714504-28177350-6E45-4853-ACCC-017CBE3518F6Q35950622-D66F98FC-ACA0-4423-B99A-27DCE63BCAC1Q36012112-D39AE91A-9B07-4F9C-95F5-240C99C124D3Q36114623-5765A682-6ED3-4DFF-AD4E-2B7F1E716DAEQ36152319-655912F5-6CD1-4CEF-A733-D47780D36A07Q36266749-29CCA94C-E130-4B44-8B5D-3A025F4E48D9Q36363162-AA8AE8F4-87A2-4365-B8DF-322F258B5C1EQ36484546-917A26FB-CE93-4103-B082-6216094A22DEQ37072176-95E31557-674A-4FF5-BF16-EF9EA1706336Q37446677-38399CC7-96DA-4FEB-BE23-DC047AF12487Q37605464-EA8AF949-78B0-4D32-965B-BFF9A6311B95Q37610459-A0E41BEF-175F-4B2C-A981-92EBFA27D694Q38608377-F014D040-6346-4E92-9B28-05D3A27A544DQ38610846-451ED992-3134-4E63-B92F-97F2D7F9B7ADQ38685671-146A5550-7D4F-47B9-A418-95FBB3EC557DQ39022886-459FFBA4-D56A-42ED-B496-B6570C17CFD0
P2860
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@ast
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en-gb
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@nl
type
label
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@ast
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en-gb
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@nl
prefLabel
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@ast
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en-gb
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@nl
P2860
P50
P3181
P1476
Healthcare outcomes assessed w ...... assessed in randomized trials
@en
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1002/14651858.MR000034.PUB2
P407
P577
2014-04-29T00:00:00Z