Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
about
Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane ReviewsAssisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane ReviewsIn vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertilityInterventions for improving reproductive outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing assisted reproductive techniquesAssisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane ReviewsNumber of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injectionCleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologyThe Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic DiagnosisEmbryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoringAssisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): evaluation of evidence to support public policy developmentNon-invasive methods for embryo selectionRelative kinetic expressions defining cleavage synchronicity are better predictors of blastocyst formation and quality than absolute time points.The German Middleway as Precursor for Single Embryo Transfer. A Retrospective Data-analysis of the Düsseldorf University Hospital's Interdisciplinary Fertility Centre - UniKiD.Live birth after fresh versus frozen single blastocyst transfer (Frefro-blastocyst): study protocol for a randomized controlled trialChanges in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles.Comparison of clinical outcomes between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers.The clinical outcomes of day 3 4-cell embryos after extended in vitro culture.Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection?Characterization of the altered gene expression profile in early porcine embryos generated from parthenogenesis and somatic cell chromatin transfer.Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?Uterine flushing with supernatant embryo culture medium in vitrified warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.Arachidonic and linoleic acid derivatives impact oocyte ICSI fertilization--a prospective analysis of follicular fluid and a matched oocyte in a 'one follicle--one retrieved oocyte--one resulting embryo' investigational settingRatio of progesterone-to-number of follicles as a prognostic tool for in vitro fertilization cyclesTrends and correlates of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer.A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go?Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.Is the presence of an uncleaved embryo on day 3 a useful predictor of outcomes following day 5 transfer?Interventions for the prevention of OHSS in ART cycles: an overview of Cochrane reviews.Soluble CD146, an innovative and non-invasive biomarker of embryo selection for in vitro fertilization.Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor supplementation in culture media for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction technologies: a systematic reviewThe impact of patient preselection on reported IVF outcomes.Early compaction at day 3 may be a useful additional criterion for embryo transferOxidative markers in cryopreservation medium from frozen-thawed embryos: a possible tool for improved embryo selection in in vitro fertilization?Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers.Preimplantation genetic screening- the required RCT that has not yet been carried out.Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study.Comparison of the clinical outcomes of day 4 and 5 embryo transfer cyclesPerinatal Risks Associated with Early Vanishing Twin Syndrome following Transfer of Cleavage- or Blastocyst-Stage Embryos.
P2860
Q24186642-3B3EFE37-6427-416E-AA93-495386223CF5Q24187504-F4EFFFB7-269E-4848-837C-D1A2C653771FQ24187729-03E9A0D1-B288-4C4A-A115-7CF8019308F1Q24197760-B4C495A8-0981-4A8A-831A-B8D43A790BE0Q24200639-40E36D72-2F7D-430A-9724-FDC9CBCE02FEQ24201012-F0E8C396-8DA4-4CC1-9E61-EBF6FB1BC22AQ26471376-639F2E08-DC67-41E4-8C8C-2A1FDC3530EEQ26768198-E15BF806-961C-434C-93BB-50A7C49C8D25Q26995448-437A29D1-C868-4978-9A20-7836A69A102DQ27013809-EBDF84F5-6C2E-42C9-8063-F39D4F89688CQ28067249-524F2B88-C690-44A7-A837-5B352C329D29Q30615610-36EE9EAE-0440-4DC5-810B-D4CA4685AEA8Q31111724-25A839FB-586E-4DEE-BCA8-13DDC87F3F15Q33767748-95E50D34-5B90-465C-B45E-6DC9715359D5Q33836615-547151AD-A612-4DC1-B1BB-7DDB2C6298A5Q33953773-3F83101C-F95A-4599-BAB9-02C2A0CD146AQ34962748-B77CA0C3-394E-46D2-A5DF-3990FA995DBCQ35078777-58B76AE6-1758-4FA7-95A8-F4A063556EC1Q35122000-C4075168-22DB-4000-AF49-B7C24BC3AFFEQ35160862-A18B593B-E387-482F-828B-61830EFF0E77Q35160865-7B043950-FF2C-4E27-A8E0-720CB17C5437Q35160889-570B80AB-10C6-46FE-BDC0-5C3D30690470Q35170834-A8492B47-7C7E-434C-8A0B-7897F33FDCE4Q35816175-6EF44AF6-6998-492D-B772-E46A6F44A1C9Q35891713-1FBA8100-8CF5-418E-8D7B-77A9A9642959Q35938178-6142152E-4095-4760-BFF4-08C05FC93B2AQ36030666-0151623C-0DDF-404C-AC1A-0E01B0CB58E2Q36127755-CCECDEA7-39E8-4CE5-9BB3-95B788C06C4DQ36256879-2158E2C9-AF71-4832-A765-CD83EC603641Q36307573-7BE1DF01-FD0D-45EF-8792-1445ADB4C57AQ36676766-365DF5B9-38A3-457B-AC7D-4EA8D66861FBQ36758994-B4B5DDD5-D8E6-41DF-8093-E1BB3E7B0601Q36875038-6383083C-BD04-40CA-8C0E-37BAA15C95EDQ36957622-5B314FE7-9DD4-43EB-ACDE-C84E85147AE7Q37019724-10075086-A307-41A4-9FCA-189861A16F52Q37038000-9896A3DA-08DA-45FF-ACAF-A15D88DBCA66Q37099603-DAA06453-50E7-45CA-B6F2-D72F50B16588Q37140349-74BA30DF-8DA4-4429-AD6F-790B8253C5FEQ37264537-C7B94185-A107-4EB1-929C-8EB7F9D793EBQ37557679-FE2FC3C9-2BDB-4923-9820-9588198C9D01
P2860
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@ast
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en-gb
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@nl
type
label
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@ast
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en-gb
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@nl
prefLabel
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@ast
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en-gb
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@nl
P2093
P2860
P3181
P1476
Cleavage stage versus blastocy ...... sisted reproductive technology
@en
P2093
Ariel Bardach
Debbie Blake
Demián Glujovsky
P2860
P3181
P356
10.1002/14651858.CD002118.PUB4
P577
2012-07-11T00:00:00Z