Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24240221

about

Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials Strategies to reduce attrition in randomised trials Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review Factors relating to participation in follow-up to the 45 and up study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals.Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials.Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods (UPSTREAM) for diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Preventing anxiety problems in children with Cool Little Kids Online: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Keele Aches and Pains Study protocol: validity, acceptability, and feasibility of the Keele STarT MSK tool for subgrouping musculoskeletal patients in primary care Interactions between medical residents and drug companies: a national survey after the Mediator® affair Use of Clinical Anatomy Resources by Musculoskeletal Outpatient Physiotherapists in Australian Public Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management Menstrual characteristics and night work among nurses Rationale and design of the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study Determinants of HPV vaccination intentions among Dutch girls and their mothers: a cross-sectional study Challenges in identifying barriers to adoption in a theory-based implementation study: lessons for future implementation studies.Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.A community-wide campaign to promote physical activity in middle-aged and elderly people: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities Maximising response from GPs to questionnaire surveys: do length or incentives make a difference?Web-based interventions to decrease alcohol use in adolescents: a Delphi study about increasing effectiveness and reducing drop-out.Community-wide promotion of physical activity in middle-aged and older Japanese: a 3-year evaluation of a cluster randomized trial.SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.Gathering opinion leader data for a tailored implementation intervention in secondary healthcare: a randomised trial.Acupuncture for the treatment of phantom limb syndrome in lower limb amputees: a randomised controlled feasibility study.Increasing the response rate of text messaging data collection: a delayed randomized controlled trial.What impact do posters have on academic knowledge transfer? A pilot survey on author attitudes and experiences Surveying End-of-Life Medical Decisions in France: Evaluation of an Innovative Mixed-Mode Data Collection Strategy Survey Email Scheduling and Monitoring in eRCTs (SESAMe): A Digital Tool to Improve Data Collection in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Investigating the collection and assessment of patient-reported outcome data amongst unplanned surgical hospital admissions: a feasibility study Using patient and physician perspectives to develop a shared decision-making framework for colorectal cancer.Comparing screening instruments to predict posttraumatic stress disorder.Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality.Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study Primary care physicians' familiarity, beliefs, and perceived barriers to practice guidelines in non-diabetic CKD: a survey study.The Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SUNS) for haematological cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study assessing the relevance and psychometric properties.A primary health-care intervention on pre- and postnatal risk factor behavior to prevent childhood allergy. The Prevention of Allergy among Children in Trondheim (PACT) study

P2860

Q23920042-6DFEA3A7-711D-463C-9531-D9D40B20C48E Q24202028-9252BBC4-7793-481F-A91D-2E8F18FB1EFE Q24234610-9C612282-37C3-4095-A568-75068B61F4B1 Q24236017-04C562E2-9869-4517-A11A-F96BF0FCF99C Q24241074-77D453D0-9E59-4364-9B31-F4ED03C64A58 Q26827761-2A984F59-56B3-4E25-8ABD-F3A6A1681681 Q27026398-5EAFE989-0740-4F19-887F-FA8F02D0F46B Q27314787-48B84105-5923-43C4-9027-DF2E3C2695D1 Q27334893-A4386314-F2D3-49E0-98CC-B1D0E3D16CDB Q27335093-818FFE3D-7F3F-4224-B40F-ED4DCC85992E Q27335295-A5B6B64B-512F-40C1-98D7-497CC1D5ED11 Q28392100-892488EA-6742-4AE0-A670-0028F874F9B4 Q28543522-2F704511-A66F-4912-A090-9171290B782F Q28606760-B3FD45BB-E2DA-4445-8659-619A3CCDDBC5 Q28657841-49C13FF6-51E0-496F-B19B-C2AF7D3085EB Q28917087-8AF4C915-E6BE-44A9-8CA2-62575D44245D Q29109927-AD2833DC-8E0F-448E-978E-D2B7ADB09AC7 Q29353767-CB89DCE5-6794-4364-9BDF-00688226E6CF Q30531408-17BA05E0-2EEC-42D7-826F-7DB8CA616BC5 Q30537000-4993823F-54B9-400D-97A9-8EF22F5E0E05 Q30539225-753F8D41-FB1B-4D39-8C1A-007D61CB1D43 Q30596317-37DA8190-6762-422B-AED2-2BEAA0A3062A Q30615398-2AD6FD0E-B3E1-4807-96CF-DCCB19E3A2BC Q30642081-274413CF-C3D6-49E1-B5F2-DF787D7058F6 Q30655984-D53793D9-3F00-46E6-8EDF-19EDB491D93A Q30657000-227BB207-4A5D-470E-BD95-30FC10E2DAD2 Q30773255-C950DED9-6CFC-497B-BC4B-7EB7AA571F8C Q30826523-7912E11F-8D3D-4015-8E32-C213350FC784 Q30863330-EC61926C-C8F2-4893-AC1D-E98BA9A32F7A Q30967740-E2A7BF48-F18B-4A58-AE0D-63FBE8A38885 Q31047718-8D0F7167-160B-4610-A8F8-A8468431F758 Q31144186-4FFDC792-EE36-4099-AED3-BC00CA76D3A1 Q31148651-FB2720EB-5764-465D-9C30-09C7D10C8D0A Q33583323-D3E37E27-6112-4DDE-8FEA-A7A3923CC46F Q33591482-499D2BFE-8F2E-4E41-8124-95573950171D Q33597129-04AD7C91-001E-4321-BE69-F84DD26D78A4 Q33602235-EF013FAF-281B-4E13-9A23-C1B383BA67AC Q33612080-A804B2C2-747C-4585-BD9A-AE469ABBB825 Q33633476-9F8D3B9A-9541-48C9-9804-A6DEA2609C75 Q33643755-499F8887-272B-4663-9D69-F85D1ADE7D13

P2860

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24240221

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2009 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年論文

@yue

2009年論文

@zh-hant

2009年論文

@zh-hk

2009年論文

@zh-mo

2009年論文

@zh-tw

2009年论文

@wuu

name

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@ast

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en-gb

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@nl

type

label

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@ast

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en-gb

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@nl

prefLabel

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@ast

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en-gb

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@nl

P1433

Q24240221-E138D4B0-E2F7-498B-849E-E77A33CAD53E

P1476

Q24240221-9F21D369-4557-4DED-B722-3D5C4DC83A8C

P2093

Q24240221-00270D97-43BF-42E6-9D33-5A3655AFB5B6

Q24240221-2C29638B-DC41-405C-B997-514242CA5BD4

Q24240221-6416CDDD-F314-45F2-B459-67671DF5E3AA

Q24240221-6AE69AA6-FFD1-4653-9892-30C095226D86

Q24240221-8CC2929E-7A8F-47B5-91EA-9053A33208D0

Q24240221-AC9D2BD3-5A9B-4FDC-ADA1-2F1429640F5E

Q24240221-DC863ADC-0C2A-4F48-ACDD-40AE2CA2C7BB

P2860

Q24240221-06898425-1E8E-42DD-B9E1-3EE21D052307

Q24240221-07EEA472-01EE-476C-AE2D-88FAC5563647

Q24240221-0A56FF4E-4BDE-4F3B-A9B9-7FDE87C5EB8A

Q24240221-0ACCC721-D062-4B41-A901-6E166DC1D9FA

Q24240221-0B46A7B0-E5CF-4589-A89A-06F1838239D7

Q24240221-0B552CCE-B1B2-4D4C-82A3-2A21DFA887E4

Q24240221-10A2930F-0B58-40EA-B4C7-16AEC90448AA

Q24240221-13764BAB-A3E1-4B71-8DC3-8A51A63587CE

Q24240221-15410A48-AF64-4610-9E0A-D035F72D60DC

Q24240221-154A6CB5-9F5B-4D53-AFB0-B92A928E4D79

P31

Q24240221-252943bd-cd33-421d-a296-56f2b6534b4c

Q24240221-5BB08BC1-D642-4581-B5BE-1320CEB9435E

P3181

Q24240221-F47413B7-AD1D-4932-8EE6-EC7EF42761C9

P356

Q24240221-B67BFF29-5147-4150-BCB6-8F680266D3C1

P50

Q24240221-5ADE6C01-EDF1-4785-A3AE-F5615EE10206

Q24240221-6BAC663B-C982-4237-8397-D6D7183D8BC2

P577

Q24240221-62D2C88F-67B7-420F-A91D-396A20D5B6CA

P698

Q24240221-F3C410FF-54EA-440D-AC21-2844355C801E

P921

Q24240221-2977F1A1-7D25-4C56-A7E3-612DDD1D68B1

P3181

P356

14651858.MR000008.PUB4

P1433

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

P1476

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

@en

P2093

Ian Roberts

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Irene Kwan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lambert M Felix

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mike J Clarke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Philip James Edwards

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Reinhard Wentz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sarah Pratap

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. ISRCTN 32032031

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review

Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires.

Timing of patient satisfaction assessment: effect on questionnaire acceptability, completeness of data, reliability and variability of scores.

A comparison of response rate, data quality, and cost in the collection of data on sexual history and personal behaviors. Mail survey approaches and in-person interview.

Effects of different designs and extension of a food frequency questionnaire on response rate, completeness of data and food frequency responses.

Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

The use of a prepaid incentive to convert nonresponders on a survey of physicians.

P31

scholarly article

P3181

79328

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1002/14651858.MR000008.PUB4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Carolyn DiGuiseppi

P577

2009-07-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

19588449

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921