Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24599059

about

Safety aspects in surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the proximal femur - modular endoprosthetic replacement vs. intramedullary nailing How do we estimate survival? External validation of a tool for survival estimation in patients with metastatic bone disease-decision analysis and comparison of three international patient populations.Treating metastatic disease: Which survival model is best suited for the clinic?Which implant is best after failed treatment for pathologic femur fractures?Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures.Metastatic bone disease: Have we improved after a decade of guidelines?Is Prophylactic Intervention More Cost-effective Than the Treatment of Pathologic Fractures in Metastatic Bone Disease?Skeletal metastasis: treatments, mouse models, and the Wnt signaling.What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?Outcome after fixation of metastatic proximal femoral fractures: A systematic review of 40 studies.The surgical management and treatment of metastatic lesions in the proximal femur: A mini review.Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review.Risk factors for intramedullary nail breakage in proximal femoral fractures: a 10-year retrospective review.Management of long bone metastases: recommendations from the Italian Orthopaedic Society bone metastasis study group.Case series of patients with pathological dyaphiseal fractures from metastatic bone disease.Complications and Postoperative Mortality Rate After Surgery for Pathological Femur Fracture Related to Bone Metastasis: Analysis of a Nationwide Database.Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.Clinical and functional comparison of endoprosthetic replacement with intramedullary nailing for treating proximal femur metastasis Trends in the surgical treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures among Musculoskeletal Tumor Society members Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases.Postoperative Ambulatory Performance Status Significantly Affects Implant Failure Rate Among Surgical Treatment Strategies in Patients With Proximal Femur Metastasis.Factors associated with local recurrence after surgery for bone metastasis to the extremities.Surgical management of metastatic lesions of the proximal femur with pathological fractures using intramedullary nailing or endoprosthetic replacement.Intramedullary Nailing Combined with Bone Grafting for Benign Lesions of the Proximal Femur.A comparison of questionnaires for assessing physical function in patients with lower extremity bone metastases.CORR Insights®: What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?No consensus on implant choice for oligometastatic disease of the femoral head and neck.Multimodal Treatment of Bone Metastasis-A Surgical Perspective Surgical management of metastatic lesions of proximal femur and the hip

P2860

Q33642884-B284C848-A6C7-4E14-B401-51FEE0B421FD Q35638675-E47D928D-5DB9-4BC4-B8A0-363BC3467514 Q36585894-245B95E2-479E-47E1-84AF-3B1187D0AB2F Q36585933-7F8815D9-929A-4772-A931-0F5969DD007B Q36671761-9BB13819-5822-4F94-80C1-A227E229F76A Q36934275-B24BD433-17C8-4CD4-9163-D2E173AC7CD4 Q36952163-8AC599E0-4A76-4739-BADB-0440033DEDCF Q37354085-78CE2B12-18A8-4DCE-AE23-CD02588D2881 Q38799827-AA981C09-98B3-4CE3-B91D-64689B562764 Q38884973-31AC1FF8-E9F0-4A5F-9CCB-FE26ECB13F96 Q38900557-49268A1E-E4A8-497B-97AC-DB144421303C Q38960060-DF0FDD5D-91D3-4D05-BFE4-3E375FE2C197 Q38962058-6D2207FB-04C4-4BD7-9BE7-92BFC24E97EE Q39140601-038ED4FF-7FBA-4D05-AC9F-995E29756863 Q40096990-4C15010D-BECC-4CCD-8AE7-360691607D07 Q40464758-754411CD-16A8-4AC5-82FF-C65988F33FFC Q40730407-26FAC399-F5F1-4229-8598-9A41DDDFF436 Q41495565-CCF3376C-41DC-42DD-A053-2CD2D56B3074 Q41899100-2D2F2F10-3D25-4FF6-8B9F-75659C2DFDD8 Q44827346-E3B99E0C-29AA-4959-A109-150D8BD59AB6 Q48032453-FAB2AACE-B510-480A-91E9-431B4E8B6015 Q48169663-2BDDE9B1-BB9F-440D-B896-564BF50108F7 Q49333899-C6B4C71C-FE6D-4983-BD2C-2344986B4F70 Q50795903-864CDCDB-331C-489F-8938-11C1C87F1551 Q51746216-4F3940E6-C429-4063-82E2-8ED47C72FA8E Q54856921-918E9E07-1018-4280-A93F-99CCEEE761C8 Q54920083-30438F5D-E799-4A61-9723-FFC4218974C7 Q57652753-AD2BB706-C4B2-4310-8BE8-219417683D4A Q59132010-54D29642-9E1D-4191-B241-CEA6E45826C5

P2860

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24599059

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2012 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年論文

@yue

2012年論文

@zh-hant

2012年論文

@zh-hk

2012年論文

@zh-mo

2012年論文

@zh-tw

2012年论文

@wuu

name

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@ast

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@en

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@nl

type

label

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@ast

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@en

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@nl

prefLabel

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@ast

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@en

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@nl

P1433

Q24599059-A036E410-3376-45D5-991C-D8B55DEACC36

P1476

Q24599059-BC87C06F-1C79-4185-8294-3B78DD2B11DA

P2093

Q24599059-11245395-3BF1-4F55-99C3-4D44CF12EE3D

Q24599059-3BF85920-2D23-4692-B5DB-CC6A49793A31

Q24599059-85353811-A083-471E-A0B0-5DA7859C4E73

Q24599059-DD08140B-57B2-4C14-96F7-EF0317498852

Q24599059-DFF407FB-7BA7-4D19-8666-C235C6F0CB7E

P2860

Q24599059-052EB8BD-5B02-42F4-8D35-B1642318BF69

Q24599059-09B5D925-88F0-477C-9AF6-82C21233E074

Q24599059-15FBEA7F-95EB-41EB-A482-F598616F045E

Q24599059-1A11ED70-F2D4-4983-9FEA-A3366EFCD37A

Q24599059-1B51327F-C973-4FF2-B2C5-1D8440ACA59B

Q24599059-36221871-D81B-4C9D-A533-D3B903C0971B

Q24599059-38A2416A-FCE8-42B5-A9CB-0A20FA56F928

Q24599059-403CD91A-F450-4E1F-B82F-8119F098E7A3

Q24599059-4C999515-844B-47A1-AA53-1E101659EE85

Q24599059-6A67B052-C159-4200-B1CA-F7323C6BAA4D

P2888

Q24599059-400C78EF-E488-436F-9728-E7E2D58CFCE4

P304

Q24599059-0E32D572-C1C6-41C1-9DA5-8AD4D37035F0

P31

Q24599059-BB045DA0-A229-4395-9E0D-7561DAD0A4F8

P3181

Q24599059-F443802C-9D6A-4C28-8A30-647F7964C377

P356

Q24599059-F67D7329-8921-489A-A76F-63CCC5A95C7C

P407

Q24599059-7079D1DC-95E4-4B87-BA18-150630D295D6

P433

Q24599059-F705636A-0FA3-4178-8116-2BA8C9ED4970

P478

Q24599059-5A2C2658-A167-47DD-B9E0-98F9CE06F9B9

P577

Q24599059-D372BD0E-102C-4A9C-A622-C3BD628B5CE0

P5875

Q24599059-6EDE46BC-36A7-42A2-84CA-BCCF10972C07

P6179

Q24599059-4221D84E-26F7-4984-BBB0-B0E8EE506F47

P698

Q24599059-E07DDB17-199C-44F6-837E-6768D7A669DE

P932

Q24599059-4FCB082F-0DCA-4471-BAE8-58F646896AA2

P3181

P356

S11999-011-2047-Z

P1433

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

P1476

Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures

@en

P2093

Carol D Morris

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Edward Athanasian

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

John H Healey

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matthew Steensma

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick J Boland

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures.

Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment.

Treatment of pathological fractures of the hip by endoprosthetic replacement.

Function and health status in surgically treated bone metastases.

The use of methylmethacrylate as an adjunct in the internal fixation of unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Surgical treatment of metastatic fractures of the femur: a retrospective analysis of 142 patients.

Complications and results of arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of malignant pathologic fractures of the hip.

The incidence of acute cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunction following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral metastasis.

Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail?

Impact of postoperative radiation therapy and other perioperative factors on outcome after orthopedic stabilization of impending or pathologic fractures due to metastatic disease.

P2888

s11999-011-2047-z

P304

920-6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P3181

2532875

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1007/S11999-011-2047-Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

470

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2012-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51607172

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1019033823

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21879407

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3270160

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string