Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
about
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesEducation and dementia in the context of the cognitive reserve hypothesis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and qualitative analysesCircular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventionsEnzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher diseaseRandomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trialsInterventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skinSingle, double or multiple injection techniques for axillary brachial plexus block for hand, wrist or forearm surgeryRandomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trialsDeveloping and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceSurgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)Teaching cardiac auscultation to trainees in internal medicine and family practice: does it work?Low adherence with antihypertensives in actual practice: the association with social participation--a multilevel analysisPractice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility studyHow to promote, improve and test adherence to scientific evidence in clinical practiceWhat do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic reviewLow protein diets in patients with chronic kidney disease: a bridge between mainstream and complementary-alternative medicines?Multimodal care for the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist and hand: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) CollaborationReality of evidence-based practice in palliative careWhich factors may determine the necessary and feasible type of effectiveness evidence? A mixed methods approach to develop an instrument to help coverage decision-makersThe value of (pre)school playgrounds for children's physical activity level: a systematic reviewMonitoring medicines use: the role of the clinical pharmacologistEffect of metformin intervention during pregnancy on the gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysisChildhood asthma and physical activity: a systematic review with meta-analysis and Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology assessmentMeta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological reviewRisk of acute myocardial infarction with nonselective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysisAre patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undertreated?The national alcohol helpline in Sweden: an evaluation of its first yearThe homeopathic preparation Nervoheel N can offer an alternative to lorazepam therapy for mild nervous disordersTobacco use cessation and weight management among motor freight workers: results of the gear up for health studyDrug-induced acute myocardial infarction: identifying 'prime suspects' from electronic healthcare records-based surveillance systemRisk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias ToolThe WOMED model of benign thyroid disease: Acquired magnesium deficiency due to physical and psychological stressors relates to dysfunction of oxidative phosphorylationLow-protein diets in CKD: how can we achieve them? A narrative, pragmatic reviewA tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology.Clinical research on postoperative trauma care: has the position of observational studies changed?Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.Considerations for the analysis of longitudinal electronic health records linked to claims data to study the effectiveness and safety of drugs.The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment.Evidence-based practice in primary care: past, present and future.Evidence-based medicine and general practice
P2860
Q21092368-2C6B6F6F-C06B-4AAA-B629-3FEC0FAC6D71Q21134547-A25DD9C8-5C14-419A-BB01-85882488F317Q21261929-AB21BFA6-64D4-421F-9F08-F6E667164921Q24187121-97521706-FA70-46AA-A10C-FB5EF538A971Q24235283-BA410D00-B83C-45CC-A392-DE7AEE97C68AQ24236003-6BA5C757-1FCB-41A4-89D1-8DD3E5110F94Q24244732-EBB6A61D-DEE7-43CC-9458-8E7062C8127BQ24245576-3209224A-C066-4A5F-8959-5901D13BF8E9Q24647443-004F49A0-3726-4EE5-B898-1B629158927AQ24658130-F645DA79-8A15-4EA0-9AB5-E5C5FAB5D09AQ24795725-252DE68F-BB12-4881-9288-A679F0A81671Q24797246-1FE756BA-E4DB-4088-AD69-7A98C96E0CE4Q24797373-095BE5E8-8F52-47E0-829C-B71ADC476AE7Q24810512-63B167C0-DEDE-443B-B011-44F0194AEC42Q24810678-963B5C4D-A5C0-4AC5-A59B-2A246F95BBF1Q26743443-5A2CBA82-ECD5-48D2-B77C-5252486A72F0Q26767197-7925665D-9A57-4B7D-AAC2-B55B66FE2A6EQ26778797-31FBE976-0525-4A98-916B-126D4794D167Q26798243-41E51655-1477-4E87-B7A1-1984C8D421BAQ26822367-2ECB754B-401B-43A9-A5EF-E121D66F5056Q26829859-E223AD48-B7BE-4D2E-A641-94BF8FA001F8Q26991523-4AE5F0B9-88DC-421D-AB74-287818B2807CQ27311280-FEE0AC98-550A-4C20-AEC7-12AE8CEEA1B7Q28073236-31C194B3-0F6A-4845-9B97-F10D54B0BB21Q28200524-3D8A9485-FC6F-47E1-ADB1-C704D6413804Q28219991-66AABFBF-60E1-4BB7-A2D4-0086D856881EQ28243738-34B6C230-BE0D-433B-B78C-9D156B14922EQ28298877-2B9917A2-BA2D-4C17-BEE5-EA72436EF701Q28396464-7B83FDD2-2861-46EC-A232-BD16D112F4B8Q28535919-DBD4C384-3913-4B1F-9498-3171382C8AD4Q28551188-06C7CA47-4BE6-492F-A25B-0CD3DEDDFAD0Q28607038-A8A10700-D409-4213-937A-AB5102E3ABD7Q28651203-83E164DE-4276-4094-8FEE-6BDE59873225Q30235546-415F698F-98B6-4661-8A63-CFAA80BCAE0AQ30248208-CADDEA73-E634-439B-A516-A0881968EDE0Q30249320-0522E45B-BB44-49C3-AE67-6169AB4E4CF9Q30251866-4B7179A9-C1E2-4446-B3E7-C0C034A331F3Q30424605-32DA06D2-FEB4-4BD9-A25F-0BEC5983CF40Q30427917-C4E24313-66A0-44F2-A513-738C6B26B716Q30428294-0DEA3105-00C9-4206-AE57-F32EE50FD001
P2860
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1996 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
name
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@ast
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@en
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@nl
type
label
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@ast
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@en
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@nl
prefLabel
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@ast
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@en
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@nl
P2860
P3181
P1433
P1476
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1136/BMJ.312.7040.1215
P407
P577
1996-05-11T00:00:00Z