Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24670503

about

Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010 Pseudoaddiction: Fact or Fiction? An Investigation of the Medical Literature Understanding the rural-urban differences in nonmedical prescription opioid use and abuse in the United States How much time do low-income patients and primary care physicians actually spend discussing pain? A direct observation study.Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clin Pain assessment for people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment tools.Veterans walk to beat back pain: study rationale, design and protocol of a randomized trial of a pedometer-based internet mediated intervention for patients with chronic low back pain.Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients.Documentation of pain care processes does not accurately reflect pain management delivered in primary care Does screening for pain correspond to high quality care for veterans?Feasibility of international data collection and feedback on post-operative pain data: proof of concept.Survey of Primary-Care Providers on Perceived Benefits of and Barriers to PainTracker Defining racial and ethnic disparities in pain management.Quality Assessment of Acute Inpatient Pain Management in an Academic Health Center.The Barriers to High-Quality Inpatient Pain Management: A Qualitative Study.Measuring pain impact versus pain severity using a numeric rating scale.Thai Nurses' experiences of post-operative pain assessment and its' influence on pain management decisions Objective evidence of severe disease: opioid use in chronic pain.The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review.What are the advantages of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of acute and chronic pain?Morphine versus Hydromorphone: Does Choice of Opioid Influence Outcomes?Educational needs of health care providers working in long-term care facilities with regard to pain management.Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care Agreement between electronic medical record-based and self-administered pain numeric rating scale: clinical and research implications The practitioner proposes a treatment change and the patient declines: what to do next?Implementation of the veterans health administration national pain management strategy Pedometer-based internet-mediated intervention for adults with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial Age and sex trends in long-term opioid use in two large American health systems between 2000 and 2005 Continuous opioid therapy (COT) is rarely advisable for refractory chronic daily headache: limited efficacy, risks, and proposed guidelines.Does routine pain assessment result in better care?Putting pain assessment into practice: why is it so painful?Care management practices for chronic pain in veterans prescribed high doses of opioid medications.Increases in the use of prescription opioid analgesics and the lack of improvement in disability metrics among users.Acute pain in undergraduate medical education: an unfinished chapter!Does perioperative sleep disruption impact pain perception?Diagnosis and treatment of narcotic bowel syndrome.[The experiences of intensive care nurses in the assessment and intervention of pain relief in children].Providing chronic pain management in the "Fifth Vital Sign" Era: Historical and treatment perspectives on a modern-day medical dilemma.National Trends in Antidepressant, Benzodiazepine, and Other Sedative-Hypnotic Treatment of Older Adults in Psychiatric and Primary Care.

P2860

Q24634093-18F3AC88-3558-4891-AE9C-CFC4E2B459B9 Q26778442-6E5CA6D7-90F9-4B7F-8578-CD4A19D08535 Q28396625-F19CC2E6-F2C6-40B1-BA2F-4BF58B5A8893 Q30516571-9C59CC3B-EFC4-48AB-9ADD-4C41D6A4E6F7 Q30558643-674DC60E-D78F-4DC4-A318-9E4F6CFC8426 Q30614326-FDFA738D-5B51-43E5-A49F-BA62AEBAF969 Q33690931-DEA4DC70-CE9E-4DE7-ABCD-466AE08DADA7 Q33728500-D7564863-DFF4-491E-B638-662555B60BAB Q33730880-9E79A3B9-23EE-45DA-B4D8-9AE637903952 Q34050753-92211C76-D3AE-4679-B11D-5A2E7D55609B Q34159912-C55676EE-8F96-40A0-B074-D1E9D3B8B9A0 Q34871333-675F6301-2B59-45CB-A99D-65478433412B Q35036538-6DD1EDE3-2DA2-4D64-B12F-6D9E6889C795 Q35186338-B77611E4-7A6D-4B6E-B785-81CD90E2792F Q35186375-233882F2-7965-4889-AE43-EEC3DA144193 Q35888203-9594B224-05B6-4C8B-876D-7C7B72E2DFC7 Q35942543-14F56779-B6E0-45AA-9DDB-2C4DF69C49AB Q36083530-6685AEFE-0821-40DA-9FD0-338B7D37F3CE Q36183419-E3578251-D870-4E7E-B288-D4BC275AD0D9 Q36263366-D6254B12-1A34-4857-814A-5C84E77EA287 Q36279156-98F93E6D-14CB-4634-9488-B01630D2A91A Q36300104-E2D214A4-9A15-4AE7-B39A-3C5B20D3E2F2 Q36406102-AD9698D9-4D33-4F9B-A315-EFDC14C680F6 Q36552256-28D5495C-CE11-49FF-81E7-BBC331431E7C Q36609632-022DF1BD-7607-4C0E-87F0-EB477033B892 Q36889224-E5C8B2AD-2413-4C90-89BE-0052D47B397D Q37030589-B8A0784D-D5C7-4462-A4B3-82304E49D6D5 Q37134318-C144A4D9-48D3-4FFB-A0BF-A7B1AE3A91E2 Q37172266-0E3A73AD-3207-4D4D-AE9D-0F810343B2DC Q37189727-2D05788E-67D5-44A8-8B52-BC07536E0021 Q37252463-FE989188-A5CC-4436-ADC3-3EEA797F0F18 Q37407019-7125BDDA-68CC-467C-ADE6-3C033E9954D3 Q37494538-DFFB1F81-097C-4B6F-BAF5-E4383FB05BE3 Q37640220-BEC40CDB-A9BB-4173-B596-5A8D7DE20655 Q38019952-435BF47C-5BBF-4F77-9E7F-F84484B27260 Q38067316-22B5418C-887D-4E6D-83D7-FC55D14B78BF Q38206072-DBE17EE8-9FEF-42A9-ACE1-469335AAE505 Q38412050-4E3198B9-C3FA-4AAF-AB37-ADC81348D88D Q38737065-573D0459-BB0C-4DE4-86CD-03D47A6A1C93 Q38816967-92EFEA23-01C4-48D8-A744-3C6DD81FD275

P2860

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24670503

description

2006 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2006 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2006 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2006年の論文

@ja

2006年論文

@yue

2006年論文

@zh-hant

2006年論文

@zh-hk

2006年論文

@zh-mo

2006年論文

@zh-tw

2006年论文

@wuu

name

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@ast

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@en

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@nl

type

label

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@ast

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@en

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@nl

prefLabel

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@ast

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@en

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@nl

P1433

Q24670503-E70FC030-9548-4211-BF0A-8847493A3DB9

P1476

Q24670503-9CFB5970-69BD-4819-BA21-EFCFD2FBAED2

P2093

Q24670503-000BD1F9-D4C9-4BBD-A355-410BA9B1264A

Q24670503-0F09FD2C-B6D5-4492-BFB3-CC7DB521487E

Q24670503-43BD211A-486A-491C-AAE5-D9633479198E

Q24670503-7FFE27ED-7923-4C03-8806-BCFE0443E8E1

Q24670503-A1AEEDF3-18FD-4FAB-9822-B1BC2629FD1E

Q24670503-C1B24A19-B098-4796-8D14-F533EC99E252

P2860

Q24670503-160568D3-A65E-4634-80A6-06E03FE0DBD7

Q24670503-38F8B72C-13F8-4435-9283-E1E7D5750FAE

Q24670503-52BECDCD-07CA-49CE-A07D-8C0839E0B008

Q24670503-5AE449C9-0FEF-4D56-A5E6-E57FCA2B7A19

Q24670503-5DE81823-FC4D-4ECD-BE9A-D0B8286F1390

Q24670503-8093206F-009F-4D32-B233-AC9161B40521

Q24670503-880B9C1E-2B12-49E9-A86E-15C76D399597

Q24670503-D2BBAC30-04F2-4500-9B10-E6561A6FBD19

Q24670503-E75B5015-5AB5-45B7-97E4-B1C9E6E8ECA8

Q24670503-F4D47EB7-CA65-4A7F-8D63-D52046C372E4

P2888

Q24670503-CFBEC9A9-D2B4-4329-84AE-436ABF5DF2F2

P304

Q24670503-2DECA4AE-6A4E-406F-91AF-12BB7B9BA554

P31

Q24670503-74F53924-4B0E-44B6-A2FB-30EB3B2D1DF8

P356

Q24670503-703908DA-9651-4F0B-B964-3AE7D36F6E5C

P407

Q24670503-CAD9C486-809B-4D43-9709-17188D9E268C

P433

Q24670503-66B2F085-B3C2-4DF3-BBA3-CDACBBE3AF29

P478

Q24670503-BBBBE116-E152-4282-B6BF-41E11A9C4B1A

P577

Q24670503-08311EAB-D4FC-4187-AFCE-F4FD04CD4E55

P5875

Q24670503-43000616-B826-41BC-B9BC-501B997DCAC0

P6179

Q24670503-0D14BFDF-38FE-4BFA-B842-2DEA90EC7614

P698

Q24670503-5A4AC6A0-88A9-4710-A583-4AD56286F884

P921

Q24670503-9564864B-B29C-4EF7-A725-712253254043

P932

Q24670503-2DDB9434-9EC0-47FC-8624-909787CAF35B

P356

J.1525-1497.2006.00415.X

P1433

Journal of General Internal Medicine

P1476

Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management

@en

P2093

Devorah Overbay

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Foy White-Chu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Linda Ganzini

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lois Miller

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Richard A Mularski

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Steven M Asch

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI): A collaboration between research and clinical practice.

From understanding health care provider behavior to improving health care: the QUERI framework for quality improvement. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative.

Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.

Relieving the agony of the new pain management standards.

No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice

The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record

Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study.

Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

P2888

j.1525-1497.2006.00415.x

P304

607-12

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1525-1497.2006.00415.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

21

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2006-06-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

6975514

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1013394584

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

16808744

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

pain management

P932

1924634

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string