Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24800755

about

A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants Reconstructive surgery for hypospadias: A systematic review of long-term patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes Lost in transition or translation? Care philosophies and transitions between child and youth and adult mental health services: a systematic review.Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract.First-line eradication of H pylori infection in Europe: a meta-analysis based on congress abstracts, 1997-2004.Quality of reporting on the vegetative state in Italian newspapers. The case of Eluana Englaro.Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008.Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer criteria.Selecting the best clinical vignettes for academic meetings: should the scoring tool criteria be modified?How do Medical Societies Select Science for Conference Presentation? How Should They?Improving the quality of abstract reporting for economic analyses in oncology.Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.Peer Review Interrater Reliability of Scientific Abstracts: A Study of an Anesthesia Subspecialty Society Nitrofuran-based regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.Analysis of reporting quality for oral presentations of observational studies at 19th National Surgical Congress: Proposal for a national evaluation system A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance.Publication Rate and Evidence-Based Evaluation of Abstracts Presented at the American College of Veterinary Surgeon's Annual Meeting.Sensibility assessment of the HIV Disability Questionnaire.Gestational tissue inflammatory biomarkers at term labor: A systematic review of literature.Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported?

P2860

Q24288722-3E0EEB17-CECC-4693-AB3E-B0DDB212D8B6 Q26749081-0662AA93-A9EE-4A90-AD26-7FF50CE8A396 Q30383175-751EB5F0-03B3-4C43-A999-75E0AD6AEAC5 Q33236914-375776AC-880A-4755-968A-FC04AED4929E Q33869371-1D2122E5-0CFD-493D-ABD3-71D7F3D9A2BE Q33886884-3937CE99-769B-4E3F-B439-D626AFD0F77B Q34086084-5AE09A0E-7555-4F5A-88E6-655DD9707040 Q35233528-C86F4239-E3DF-4A7D-B248-ED67130A8A32 Q35723674-3CC1C8AA-B909-418C-A255-3B08D76C94E1 Q35934523-F54A58AC-011B-4875-8171-701E3E9F183B Q36416266-1A6B4B87-E7B8-4AA7-8FE7-FB639AAA3632 Q36554820-351DFEDB-9B76-40CB-8F4F-1D77974D4676 Q36716523-06452306-CB2C-47AB-9133-060847A4686F Q36936445-06B1A3B7-A625-48EC-9892-52E8EA63C4A5 Q37594374-67561F75-AA16-4633-BA20-0E2DA6B1943F Q38588239-63F9D605-D4D7-42E7-B4C1-AA8CDF7F1455 Q38858560-4C618F07-AD95-4370-B5AF-9009AF56AFA1 Q39582791-7AD72F87-C6CC-4C61-8064-5D5334A86033 Q47596754-4297DAE2-9CFC-4008-8174-DBBF1D485EF2 Q51960429-654D0801-9FFD-45DE-BD41-A8D0D8DF9DA9

P2860

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24800755

description

2003 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2003 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2003 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2003年の論文

@ja

2003年学术文章

@wuu

2003年学术文章

@zh-cn

2003年学术文章

@zh-hans

2003年学术文章

@zh-my

2003年学术文章

@zh-sg

2003年學術文章

@yue

name

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@ast

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@en

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@nl

type

label

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@ast

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@en

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@nl

prefLabel

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@ast

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@en

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@nl

P1433

Q24800755-A3EC1113-8463-4C8F-99BF-E6E373C36DDC

P1476

Q24800755-99FC28B0-C08E-4279-9064-8E144C019DF7

P2093

Q24800755-C3BCD70C-9443-49EF-8D4F-7EA47B44F80D

Q24800755-D412744C-67A9-48A9-8B21-E174628DE61C

P2860

Q24800755-12D94322-B35E-4332-B2A1-CAA00EA9DD91

Q24800755-14041FC9-3297-4CA0-831B-2AE5C515518A

Q24800755-1D37D809-B5D4-401C-ABAE-FF2FD88EDFC3

Q24800755-2D9A88CB-90B9-4AF6-815D-8318E36BFC24

Q24800755-2E69F677-9BA6-422C-8AD6-45921BD55B99

Q24800755-2EAC65F1-BC6A-4722-89CC-322EFA031D75

Q24800755-308A2498-B972-4C9B-BEC5-F2A18D0D63DF

Q24800755-390F1766-CF51-448D-96E7-3CEEAFC54DB4

Q24800755-3CEBE9CD-8345-4367-B26F-3B3E00BB0056

Q24800755-3DD7AB32-4EA8-4BD8-A9BF-456B5112E721

P2888

Q24800755-D68DA55F-F86F-40C3-9694-0658B11A5F86

P304

Q24800755-CCC4A6A4-24C4-4721-B9CB-0E0E7A4B366E

P31

Q24800755-6B25B0BB-5A1A-4790-BC01-B8A899E22645

P3181

Q24800755-EA237E86-6BA3-440D-A864-B1596854ABE6

P356

Q24800755-36B1DCC6-078A-4F4F-B0B5-2C0D3ACBB1B1

P407

Q24800755-2DD29F77-E34C-4354-BDF3-B700D06ECF24

P433

Q24800755-50B5316E-08FE-4546-9D36-84AA86CC45DC

P478

Q24800755-A5AEC4DB-4430-4075-ADFB-62C7A0C0969B

P50

Q24800755-D3D757E5-F4BC-41FE-BD3D-40AF2DF93D04

P577

Q24800755-97BA3707-1B25-4F6D-BAE0-3F57479B6108

P5875

Q24800755-CCC0499C-1D0C-43EB-81B4-D9521DE3CB09

P6179

Q24800755-6AF18BDA-760E-4460-8A7E-07894A4DA2B1

P698

Q24800755-99DF9CCE-4465-4836-B18E-1EED6C3DE2F0

P932

Q24800755-F2616FD0-618E-4CD5-B53D-9C6B52FF3181

P3181

P356

P1433

BMC Medical Research Methodology

P1476

Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

@en

P2093

Lloyd R Sutherland

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robert J Hilsden

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Publication bias in gastroenterological research - a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting

Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week--a cross sectional study

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Bias against the null hypothesis: the reproductive hazards of cocaine

The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis

Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts.

A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

P2888

P304

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P3181

4920244

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1186/1471-2288-3-2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2003-02-11T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

10905990

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1045971422

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

12581457

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

149448

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string