Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.
about
Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectivesCancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningHuman papillomavirus vaccination guideline update: American Cancer Society guideline endorsementClinical photoacoustic imaging of cancerCellular and molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol-induced aggressiveness of breast cancerBreast Cancer Screening in the Precision Medicine Era: Risk-Based Screening in a Population-Based Trial.Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.Health Beliefs and Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachia: An Evaluation of the Health Belief Model.Surveillance Mammography in Older Patients With Breast Cancer-Can We Ever Stop?: A Review.Integration of Serum Protein Biomarker and Tumor Associated Autoantibody Expression Data Increases the Ability of a Blood-Based Proteomic Assay to Identify Breast CancerPosition paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, FraWhat's the Buzz: Tell Me What's Happening in Breast Cancer ScreeningValue of circulating cell-free DNA analysis as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer: a meta-analysisConclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics.Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.What determines the effects and costs of breast cancer screening? A protocol of a systematic review of reviewsCan mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?Targeting breast cancer outcomes-what about the primary relatives?Diagnostic Performance of Indocyanine Green-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.Refining Lung Cancer Screening Criteria in the Era of Value-Based MedicineFacilitating informed decisions about breast cancer screening: development and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for women in their 40sAssociation of Patient Age With Outcomes of Current-Era, Large-Scale Screening Mammography: Analysis of Data From the National Mammography Database.Capsule Commentary on Tosteson et al., Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.How Can Advanced Imaging Be Used to Mitigate Potential Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis?Progress Toward Consensus on Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reducing Screening Harms.Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities to Reduce Mortality.Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer DevelopmentIs clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?Sorafenib in breast cancer treatment: A systematic review and overview of clinical trialsAntibody-Guided In Vivo Imaging for Early Detection of Mammary Gland Tumors.Predictors of Participation in Mammography Screening among Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic Women.Inequalities in socioeconomic status and race and the odds of undergoing a mammogram in Brazil.Utilization of screening mammography in older women according to comorbidity and age: protocol for a systematic review.Racial/ethnic disparities in annual mammogram compliance among households in Little Haiti, Miami-Dade County, Florida: An observational study.Updated results of the Gothenburg Trial of Mammographic Screening.Using mammograms to predict preventive health services behavior and mortality in womenTailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.Population-Based Precision Cancer Screening: A Symposium on Evidence, Epidemiology, and Next Steps.
P2860
Q26764816-7546BE98-FA4E-4954-9C5E-91662AB2E114Q26770123-EB7FEFC8-7DD0-4484-8FC6-A58E69CCFB70Q28069669-F15DEBC3-3602-4A7E-8E72-A0EB4ECB88EEQ28078790-83A1F5D0-0126-411F-920D-36512C9D6429Q28397579-B435F228-EC1E-4B90-968D-12C5AE5ED809Q30238753-6536CDEA-02AA-4F53-944C-2F664F36A3FBQ30251601-6A93E4AD-94F1-452C-954C-F8A96B9F5562Q30276084-AD9ED373-6614-4257-87B8-27DB87F2DAA8Q30395721-5730267F-63E4-44A1-B710-1D8F0656DB75Q31120913-1C204704-EB04-459D-915B-72450BB2FB2DQ32186742-D587D565-F6F2-4D0F-BAFB-FCB6A120AD4FQ33623871-9861DDC8-8934-4BDD-848E-89A62B2436E0Q33688767-5A2E489B-8B43-4D07-8202-A163C8630C2BQ33717272-F3989B26-6B4F-42C1-B80E-E9F67D9F5E28Q33763563-0BE04058-83BD-4574-9336-3B0CE51F586BQ33850892-F025C69D-C679-4958-BF27-8D1053C0F89CQ33854497-E167FBD5-DCDD-46FC-A9B8-8846691F3C14Q33906971-C035D79C-2A85-4DBA-B225-5C2B4AF00405Q36046429-7DB29BCD-6223-478C-8D91-75B691FAB149Q36073161-260B2587-15AA-4D28-821A-DFC847070722Q36272777-7D2716AF-976F-4634-A85E-A07098A7368DQ36317511-28D35B84-624B-4102-96A7-E2B8768279CDQ36352375-3A6D2C41-AAAA-40E7-9404-256C6B2AC562Q36717559-850ADD68-3D67-4A40-85B6-8554C197DDF1Q36834970-888653E8-C339-46C0-B085-A5C0415F3CB2Q36902060-5C5F43AF-736D-4F47-9F94-9D4B424996C2Q36908218-6FBAA829-CBF3-4162-80F6-3CB4A7E1482CQ37017024-EEFC3624-8011-4DC6-9A3D-7B3742C705A6Q37079699-E94D43DB-815C-4A6B-80A9-A7C93EA51D16Q37152904-881D0335-0619-4247-95AC-B583693C07DFQ37153297-A80BF8B4-E6F9-4753-80C2-FE661142DAFBQ37221915-316FF011-DFC9-4E67-A597-D840B8CF5252Q37233991-34EF0712-4AEF-40B7-BEB2-E03817B8FB41Q37258178-1FE79678-A5F4-4C30-8784-4F468D0CADFEQ37311059-70E7E36B-B316-4A29-B2E9-ACD9EB32EB81Q37327859-3E4D650E-0785-4D15-A294-CE3EFF6C956CQ37357513-5E56DBB6-A96D-4B43-8586-D8AA5CE0243BQ37430934-D938B3F3-D327-40A1-B5C5-CBACC4F90B84Q37444608-A55ED4A4-2FAB-40CA-BFFF-0CB32C80A9B0Q37513339-DE2E7468-EC6F-4982-8680-D894D5A317E5
P2860
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2015 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
name
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... om the American Cancer Society
@nl
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@ast
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@en
type
label
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... om the American Cancer Society
@nl
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@ast
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@en
prefLabel
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... om the American Cancer Society
@nl
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@ast
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@en
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
P1476
Breast Cancer Screening for Wo ...... m the American Cancer Society.
@en
P2093
Abbe Herzig
American Cancer Society
Andrew M D Wolf
Carol DeSantis
Christopher R Flowers
Deana Manassaram-Baptiste
Debbie Saslow
Elizabeth T H Fontham
James S Michaelson
Joannie Lortet-Tieulent
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1001/JAMA.2015.12783
P407
P577
2015-10-01T00:00:00Z