about
Men, women, and ghosts in science.Real lives and white lies in the funding of scientific research: the granting system turns young scientists into bureaucrats and then betrays themExamining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review ScoresSystem crashWhy do we need a new journal in autoimmunity?The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewersAlternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluationHow do we ask for money? A view of funding for basic researchGood research conductBibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?Misrepresentation of neuroscience data might give rise to misleading conclusions in the media: the case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer ResourcesAccess for all?The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitismCover the eyes of Lady JusticeFraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct.Bibliometric analysis of original molecular biology research in anaesthesia.Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science.Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review.Publication subsidies: challenges and dilemmas facing South African researchersPerceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study.Quantification of authors' contributions and eligibility for authorship: randomized study in a general medical journalRole of the undergraduate student research assistant in the new millennium.Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers.Ranking games.Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles.Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators.The strike rate index: a new index for journal quality based on journal size and the h-index of citationsClinical research promotes development of nephrology in China: an analysis of 20 years of scientific publications.Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe.Safety classification of herbal medicines used among pregnant women in Asian countries: a systematic review.Scorpion higher phylogeny and classification, taxonomic anarchy, and standards for peer review in online publishingThe Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.The growing competition in Brazilian science: rites of passage, stress and burnout.Analysis of scientific productivity using maximum entropy principle and fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Impact factors reward and promote excellence.The system rewards a dishonest approach.
P2860
Q21092784-D9373630-880C-4A68-8254-F005A36B569CQ21563538-F4186263-8D80-424A-A438-A34CEC9A2E88Q24288660-120C30CF-282E-4F8C-A73F-DCEBC04B0046Q24289353-F41A87D8-433D-4645-9AAC-AF069DB88FAEQ24804681-0FBA003E-34DC-4B7C-B80C-88DEEF7BFB9EQ28646715-F09D7FC5-FFB2-4726-9A73-0F652A6499D1Q28741517-6070C2E4-AEC4-45A0-868F-15798FFC45FAQ28755364-D04718C2-598A-48C9-994D-160DA685CDC2Q28764475-E0D54C29-6A75-48BD-AC9E-46D9F2C2471FQ33225527-37C5519A-9A11-4FF5-97AC-2DD22CF8E010Q33484751-6B8468A6-C1B6-4EAD-82B4-661C82B396FCQ33812910-BA0200D0-4D37-4135-8AE8-68809C067638Q33917059-64E8C967-BD52-4252-979F-48EC3C163BABQ34165913-DCB3BB65-0708-4F2A-B9DE-B29E511297A7Q34446888-0878A935-D1A2-4067-8811-9631A68456DDQ35191496-518851A9-8835-4FCF-BC11-C2285BAC5B29Q35632812-3B17CB69-16A8-47EB-A90F-8B2A34C090B6Q35919933-F2ABD7E8-D838-40F8-97F9-A7B532904D5AQ36343661-23D8B34B-846A-43C8-A7A8-D0414726B78EQ36489860-B81A8A5E-5CB7-4D4B-9448-1E331087027CQ36495158-A0EB98F2-E912-4E8A-B9CB-7A552502F070Q37040405-F7E558D6-BF2C-4137-B8A4-D4902789C3DCQ37097810-7FA4395C-0721-48AE-8E40-23BC981AB6B1Q37181096-6679AF99-65BC-41E8-A556-F0DC39E4057AQ37672727-CE1BDAC4-E1E8-4169-BE40-2D42D7A92077Q37729130-62DA2D36-AC96-4940-ADBD-2C609249BA07Q38237046-380D8C5F-F756-4138-BA37-5F8279BA847AQ40323359-5BF694EE-6852-4C3F-B8BE-3C0D43A50D86Q42240385-59B06244-5FBF-431F-9EDB-19150E3F3F8CQ42791338-0A4D8E6E-18A4-494B-848D-8E9EC8989D2EQ43492484-F8AB9AA0-535C-4684-BC30-5DC0F2A592C1Q44554300-DA404DB1-9506-4D3F-8365-86D56070EFDAQ46200465-1F8054B9-3DAD-4498-8646-757E717A5482Q47258558-AEC93BFA-2B44-4B2E-BC65-604923C6E167Q48049100-02B19932-8A2A-4F3B-9E82-DA57AC1F5D7EQ48094320-BD506C81-59FB-48BB-9FAB-2529E6985659Q48583037-9F7CCD23-E705-4093-A0E4-E5924F01B139Q51920164-57697C26-980C-4B02-8DDF-34B28391D13AQ52102206-A85A4013-5D34-4463-96A2-7FC7B56E0175Q52104872-B6F87202-4FBC-4521-BB14-75785A696A24
P2860
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
The politics of publication
@ast
The politics of publication
@en
The politics of publication
@nl
type
label
The politics of publication
@ast
The politics of publication
@en
The politics of publication
@nl
prefLabel
The politics of publication
@ast
The politics of publication
@en
The politics of publication
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
The politics of publication
@en
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1038/422259A
P407
P577
2003-03-20T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1038550578