Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
about
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physiciansEcological studies: use with cautionWhat counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety programProfiling provider outcome quality for pay-for-performance in the presence of missing data: a simulation approachExamining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate?Measuring Diabetes Care Performance Using Electronic Health Record Data: The Impact of Diabetes Definitions on Performance Measure Outcomes.Relationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the english quality and outcomes framework and the National GP Patient Survey.What explains the quality and price of GP services? An investigation using linked survey and administrative data.Physical health indicators in major mental illness: analysis of QOF data across UK general practice.Unmet need for mental health care in schizophrenia: an overview of literature and new data from a first-admission study.Has pay-for-performance decreased access for minority patients?Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.Care transitions as opportunities for clinicians to use data exchange services: how often do they occur?Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes FrameworkThe equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.Design choices made by target users for a pay-for-performance program in primary care: an action research approach.Lessons learned in the development of process quality indicators for cancer care in Japan.Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practiceDoes higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions?The unintended consequence of diabetes mellitus pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan: are patients with more comorbidities or more severe conditions likely to be excluded from the P4P program?Quality of chronic disease care for older people in care homes and the community in a primary care pay for performance system: retrospective study.Challenges and opportunities in measuring the quality of mental health care.Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice.Does the quality and outcomes framework reduce psychiatric admissions in people with serious mental illness? A regression analysis.Setting standards at the forefront of delivery system reform: aligning care coordination quality measures for multiple chronic conditions.Exempting dissenting patients from pay for performance schemes: retrospective analysis of exception reporting in the UK Quality and Outcomes FrameworkQuality measures for the care of children with otitis media with effusion.Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.Incentivised chronic disease management and the inverse equity hypothesis: findings from a longitudinal analysis of Scottish primary care practice-level dataAchievement of cholesterol targets and prescribing of higher-cost statins: a cross-sectional study in general practiceKey issues in the design of pay for performance programs.Creation of a synthetic indicator of quality of care as a clinical management standard in primary care.Effects of Changes in Diabetes Pay-for-Performance Incentive Designs on Patient Risk SelectionTreating chronically ill people with diabetes mellitus with limited life expectancy: implications for performance measurementPay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences.Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have we learnt?Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort studyAssociations between exemption and survival outcomes in the UK's primary care pay-for-performance programme: a retrospective cohort study.Reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended medications to adults with heart failure
P2860
Q24234504-DCFEA23F-5A72-417B-AAF0-D0FDABCE7773Q28659878-25902107-1C27-407F-A0CD-4A043D112DD0Q28715347-3467FE42-DBCF-4359-B7B8-FCA154364D16Q30587744-8FA815E0-0754-4923-BCF6-879A0342D595Q30657363-4F7E05F1-DBF7-42EE-8FFA-FCF144E017D7Q30665046-9CE4ED85-6355-4E45-A22A-090CBF9272B9Q30665875-1FCDAB40-2F05-49D9-8222-66236DEA2F4DQ30828824-DB9BE550-34D0-41B0-B453-1A490DDC3EF2Q30856028-EBB59E5B-E841-4383-9A43-AFF96EC8B19CQ33464064-00EB7DC6-C576-4A60-916A-B6DB649F22AAQ33618712-EBCDA60C-4792-49F8-9D7F-0F18DA96C5E0Q33669353-E3F2E293-1BB5-447B-BD66-08337A54EBEDQ33806221-57E2EDAA-F251-4884-ABAD-3596BDAF685EQ33885486-21A85B2F-4119-47DF-978D-7D589BED3F0BQ33945203-92CA3C85-428C-410B-B766-21E1371C61ACQ34006448-B7E050CD-5F6B-4926-9285-74C543FD8A42Q34209548-8D845390-0AE0-4831-9F70-0A826AE9AC64Q34344640-04D529EF-98A4-43F5-AB45-8ACFAF052F43Q34435911-E8690C82-BFA1-4A46-832A-19E21F411608Q34554658-990649E5-FCB1-4271-AEBD-104885E65EBFQ34554665-CCDCC2E8-C3F9-4151-A26F-4E97E8A7EBF8Q34634200-CA6680D0-C69A-45C9-B060-AA9D21CE5541Q34885828-8FD57A41-3BA5-4D2E-8F95-68A730A82752Q35152507-AAC79FBB-2DAA-4CCD-AE73-8724A705EC71Q35539399-B6C65AF4-A8A6-4C5D-B86C-5A2C34262C20Q35659060-EE5F2987-279B-4034-8898-E4A237D3BFB5Q35894339-25F9FB7B-C57C-4938-8639-554BE4DC2DF3Q36071131-3E5003D5-525E-40A2-9A1E-11674773B732Q36222903-8E5C8795-78EC-422C-B866-157CB1FD1A90Q36342448-BFFDE013-4F9D-4D78-B2DA-88A4D9D581B6Q36420554-D2B0270C-92F9-4232-AC02-E7E4294707BDQ36503517-13BF7EE6-F102-457A-88EB-17D054442658Q36636910-C87CB968-0DA4-4862-9742-83871AB90D64Q36706756-82D44E35-8D00-4F74-B587-2791A09F3315Q36738051-C334F2DA-64BA-41E3-83C1-19760302A9FAQ37123922-D0D5E9C6-C9BE-4647-96A7-82F29C869782Q37154674-9CA586C1-5C9E-4D7C-933D-F55A2555C69BQ37204934-2123EC51-5DAB-45B4-B923-F5A9CDA1302CQ37235872-98BDED5B-C02C-4BE4-B2C7-560AC50589F2Q37250793-C2D32A78-3977-4C84-A220-848CE4CE5BC6
P2860
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@ast
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@en
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@nl
type
label
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@ast
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@en
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@nl
prefLabel
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@ast
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@en
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@nl
P2093
P3181
P356
P1476
Exclusion of patients from pay-for-performance targets by English physicians
@en
P2093
Catherine Fullwood
Hugh Gravelle
P304
P3181
P356
10.1056/NEJMSA0800310
P407
P577
2008-07-17T00:00:00Z