A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants
about
Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysisUse of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysisClient history and violence on direct care workers in the home care settingPsychopathy in women: theoretical and clinical perspectivesA novel approach to determining violence risk in schizophrenia: developing a stepped strategy in 13,806 discharged patientsPsychopathic PersonalityPredicting hospital aggression in secure psychiatric care.From Risk Assessment to Risk Management: Matching Interventions to Adolescent Offenders' Strengths and VulnerabilitiesDynamic relationship between multiple START assessments and violent incidents over time: a prospective cohort study.Structured assessment of violence risk in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available instrumentsViolent recidivism: a long-time follow-up study of mentally disordered offendersThe development and validation of the Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders (Y-ACNAT-NO)Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: reliability and validity of START assessments.Pilot Implementation and Preliminary Evaluation of START:AV Assessments in Secure Juvenile Correctional Facilities.Aberrant paralimbic gray matter in incarcerated male adolescents with psychopathic traits.Taking Stock and Taking Steps: The Case for an Adolescent Version of the Short-Assessment of Risk and TreatabilityThe Predictive Validity of Savry Ratings for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore: A Comparison With YLS/CMI Ratings.Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments.Psychopathic predators? Getting specific about the relation between psychopathy and violence.Risk assessment: predicting physical aggression in child psychiatric inpatient units.The validity and utility of risk assessment for inpatient suicide.Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instruments.Treating the violent patient with psychosis or impulsivity utilizing antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-dose monotherapy.Couples Counseling for Aboriginal Clients Following Intimate Partner Violence: Service Providers' Perceptions of Risk.Version 3 of the historical-clinical-risk management-20 (HCR-20V3): relevance to violence risk assessment and management in forensic conditional release contexts.Utilizing mental health professionals to help prevent the next attacks.Predictive Validity of the HKT-R Risk Assessment Tool: Two and 5-Year Violent Recidivism in a Nationwide Sample of Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Patients.Suicide Screening Tools for use in Incarcerated Offenders: A Systematic Review.Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for violent and non-violent sexual behaviour in a secure mental health service.The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.Risk assessments and recidivism among a population-based group of Swedish offenders sentenced to life in prison.An examination of violence risk communication in practice using a structured professional judgment framework.Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden: differentiating recidivists from non-recidivists in a 10-year follow-up study.Structured professional judgement and sequential redirections.Youth Actuarial Risk Assessment Tool (Y-ARAT): The development of an actuarial risk assessment instrument for predicting general offense recidivism on the basis of police records.Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: a methodological primer.Valuing structured professional judgment: predictive validity, decision-making, and the clinical-actuarial conflict.Evaluating risk assessments using receiver operating characteristic analysis: rationale, advantages, insights, and limitations.
P2860
Q21132537-6A49A88D-521D-456F-996F-A85CB22CF73BQ27007284-50156459-0B64-4635-A557-A9646A87214CQ27908439-84EF423B-7C6A-4E9B-8770-E9DBD5AA4A8AQ28269385-0A7A62DA-8F06-4F8F-8A48-9180A24B1687Q28480881-143A3C74-1BA1-4174-B2AB-04DA177DA7BDQ29396704-319F53FF-D2EB-46C7-AA28-5D519AA51635Q30490069-C8E2C299-7313-4B5D-973C-708883651046Q34394741-58A63CCD-01D8-4080-BD8B-CC792D398B54Q34700630-F01D4A01-7564-4789-888F-86CE6B72BC49Q35177079-C1485B45-4CC1-43F4-A1FF-973D03D035E0Q35315778-D027C982-5797-4949-B3D8-8BC2E32896FAQ35441364-E76CA122-422C-40A8-B8ED-E03DD5DE92B0Q36314697-D113ACD1-5FA9-4E0B-8C8C-13EDA11C4E7BQ36516883-CBFA5759-A1FE-4A9C-BBC1-284D92D8F597Q36547534-ED51C85A-0094-446E-B0F5-9A793A8CBA96Q36627806-649D4B59-6729-4DCF-BF18-C0B7AE889D58Q36830552-A20B5697-09C9-4657-A84F-B962FD7590E9Q37611747-B4B1E288-0BFD-454F-A24D-EB25D1985300Q37689308-4699AB6D-03BC-410F-8838-6F9AAE123E8DQ37895704-89EC6134-3B64-4DF5-BD20-E58CFE466B7BQ37955189-084DB340-B24D-4324-B477-42A0A7733DA7Q38074374-03CA5508-1D7F-41FF-AAC3-2C64448DC32EQ38239613-EFD3B53E-2ED8-4643-B212-08E368A85B8CQ38256010-E5C6CC25-AD30-44A6-8A47-E64AA8394BB2Q38256305-B62B1DDC-DD35-436B-AB74-EEF02B656BEFQ38643057-1F70B5BA-6351-4499-86E0-F11864E00A54Q38665511-5BC60987-DF4B-4E5E-9CCE-F03A829A5EEBQ38722388-BE864D0D-97C5-4AB2-AC7C-E26448CDA3DFQ38993370-FE2D56EB-0A8D-4AD9-B81A-6479500FF996Q39021839-51D00C69-4D7E-42F1-82F5-7630932F41C8Q39044748-6D393287-0FD9-4915-AD70-C4F28BEC6710Q39051127-DAD5BDEF-D8A8-4BB2-A9A3-555CB8B60FB1Q39156977-DFCD87C1-AF89-4975-8635-1FCB4C817615Q39323960-57111D66-0652-4941-B40E-976E764457E9Q39337921-90566A16-3E56-4FD1-91F8-7A8E0F71E23FQ39387909-CEBB3A58-3510-4527-8DB5-ACFBCF009731Q39432036-F166CBAA-5A1C-4FA8-8CCA-A3131BA26272Q39467584-13EBF782-38DD-4F96-A600-1134F357546CQ39481301-86F9B337-0151-47DA-9E41-8EC0C778489AQ39481328-35731E38-32C3-4B1A-B064-0AE14D9C0B90
P2860
A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
name
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@ast
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@en
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@nl
type
label
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@ast
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@en
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@nl
prefLabel
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@ast
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@en
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@nl
P31
P1476
A comparative study of violenc ...... involving 25,980 participants
@en
P2093
Jay P Singh
Martin Grann
P304
P356
10.1016/J.CPR.2010.11.009
P407
P50
P577
2010-12-13T00:00:00Z