The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
about
Missed Programs (You Can't TiVo This One): Why Psychologists Should Study Media.What do we really know about witness preparation?Jury decision making research: are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?Mock jury research: where do we go from here?Adding Insult to Injury: Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Juror Decision Making in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence.Effects of child interview tactics on prospective jurors' decisions.'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review.Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.Stranger at the gate: the effect of the plaintiff's use of an interpreter on juror decision-making.Evidence Summarized in Attorneys' Closing Arguments Predicts Acquittals in Criminal Trials of Child Sexual Abuse.Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.Perceptions of institutional elder neglect in civil court.Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors' verdict judgments.Adults' Insensitivity to Developmental Changes in Children's Ability to Report When and How Many Times Abuse Occurred.Great Sexpectations: The Impact of Participant Gender, Defendant Desirability, and Date Cost on Attributions of a Date Rape Victim and Defendant.How video image size interacts with evidence strength, defendant emotion, and the defendant-victim relationship to alter perceptions of the defendant.Considering her circumstances: how ethnicity and cultural relativist arguments affect sexual harassment judgments by undergraduate and community mock jurors.How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws.The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.How voluntariness of apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender.Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.How common is "common knowledge" about child witnesses among legal professionals? Comparing interviewers, public defenders, and forensic psychologists with laypeople.The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.Victim blame in a hate crime motivated by sexual orientation.A comparison of students' and jury panelists' decision-making in split recovery cases.The influence of liability information, severity of injury, and attitudes toward vengeance on damage awards.The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case.Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.Race and information processing in criminal trials: does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated?Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors' recall and recognition of trial information.Maternal blame: battered women and abused children.The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Legal Perceptions of Lesbian Intimate Partner Violence.Impeaching Rape Victims in Criminal Court: Does Concurrent Civil Action Hurt Justice?
P2860
Q30376680-7A5C42B7-CDD9-4ABF-9994-613A7C32CB04Q34616837-095B40D2-C91E-4801-B366-3D7035B4B637Q37847101-6BC13A8B-35D2-4003-80D7-1E0F68046194Q37894620-E221FAF7-03CA-41DE-90B3-301F1073EC35Q38602258-AB941077-3D7D-45C6-AD4D-3F53C3F9A2B9Q39084653-C0991396-14CE-4A0B-8231-6E54370AE381Q39274088-58CDD989-8DD9-41FC-93D2-A8EB66918416Q39378059-54AEEE44-5A23-415D-8722-91D2D010BE79Q39727764-D0EC86CE-B572-4188-8C13-B5F47D4052A9Q39984787-0F5A54BE-04FA-46A5-B44C-4CF731855C30Q42578923-7BC640BD-36B7-4435-9BD9-5C43F0E59005Q43845471-49827144-AFE3-4E29-AF62-8B5C470407A9Q44365424-13F630BB-C41B-448E-9815-DCD475619752Q45388066-D6F644CA-370C-4DAB-814B-E10D34A6FE32Q45779712-ACD36843-5D99-4E0E-B1E9-2217A5D2A765Q46376747-0F2B22DC-75CE-42DA-BDEC-BF944503B36CQ46673160-C1B93C3E-D659-4E23-8613-C7DD1D2590B9Q47174020-DD1174DD-9505-4B68-8ED5-073E1B093470Q47175891-F367E42B-F627-460C-983A-290BA427FBE2Q47316463-E0A9A2FD-E5A8-4EDA-A35B-A350D0ED4CF4Q47391891-AF393364-C7D0-41D3-92ED-8937B9EE8E82Q47558365-7806B43D-2D4D-46E4-B2E4-3B7926D89BFEQ47768270-F5D56D6C-8F65-45CA-AC3D-22B706785757Q47823759-A5133753-4140-4267-8CEE-4006C716E845Q47940272-0600DF5E-3762-43D7-8997-33252A65391CQ47952779-7C4EFCEA-68B8-425C-89C2-977CCDDCCCF2Q47960967-03DAC832-1897-400C-B67E-07BFC1499399Q48057216-D063FB80-44B0-48FC-9305-D8500ED284F4Q48123244-1A22D2FA-89E9-4DF1-B211-880FCA9E15DFQ48217664-25A30A47-E313-420C-B51F-15E09A2D93BCQ48302180-AC98B713-1863-4A6F-9095-6A266E11133DQ48322037-92319BAE-9614-462E-AF6B-E769A0C09F17Q48361751-9BAE4E26-471B-4AD9-BBF0-09FAF36FEC63Q48377668-E421C14A-5E09-453B-B9DD-BDD986D8482EQ48534629-4D62B494-1024-455A-B094-7B247C04FD58Q50560017-2A43A112-0727-4AC2-A55B-49CF9ED013A5Q50590776-083921BB-1745-46D1-BEA5-64E0DF3E5AF4Q50781965-947D3AF5-3429-4716-9A38-AE1828118EFEQ51023545-1533C085-5251-4708-A84D-CCB77DA44173Q51027393-8CAE15C9-A464-4F92-935D-953B99FDB8CB
P2860
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@ast
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@en
type
label
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@ast
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@en
prefLabel
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@ast
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@en
P356
P1476
The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?
@en
P2093
Brian H. Bornstein
P2888
P356
10.1023/A:1022326807441
P577
1999-01-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1036085240