Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
about
Use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in orthopaedic surgery.Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study"The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project" (NSQIP): a new tool to increase patient safety and cost efficiency in a surgical intensive care unit.Incidence of adverse events in an integrated US healthcare system: a retrospective observational study of 82,784 surgical hospitalizations.Improving quality of care: development of a risk-adjusted perioperative morbidity model for vaginal hysterectomy.Catastrophic Outcomes in Free Tissue Transfer: A Six-Year Review of the NSQIP Database.Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiariesComparison of outcomes after TURP versus photoselective vaporization of the prostate with respect to trainee involvement utilizing ACS NSQIP.Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital.Predicting the risk of death following coronary artery bypass graft made simple: a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.The Impact of Untreated Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Cardiopulmonary Complications in General and Vascular Surgery: A Cohort Study.Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.Development and testing of tools to detect ambulatory surgical adverse events.Surgical site infection in orthopedic trauma: A case-control study evaluating risk factors and cost.A colorectal "care bundle" to reduce surgical site infections in colorectal surgeries: a single-center experienceApplication of traditional indexes and adverse events in the ophthalmologic perioperative medical quality evaluation during 2010-2012.Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes.Hospital mortality: when failure is not a good measure of success.Exploring the frontier of electronic health record surveillance: the case of postoperative complications.Quality Improvement-Focused Departmental Grand Rounds Reports: A Strategy to Engage General Surgery Residents.Future of the US healthcare system and the effects on the practice of hand surgeryImpact of preoperative myocardial infarction on surgical outcomes in inpatient orthopaedic surgery.Obesity, outcomes and quality of care: body mass index increases the risk of wound-related complications in colon cancer surgery.The safety and risk factors of major hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery in patients older than 80 years.Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human vs computer model.Controversies surrounding quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.Major and minor complications in extraoperative electrocorticography: A review of a national database.Preventability of death in a medical intensive care unit at a university hospital in a developing country.Nosocomial infections within the first month of solid organ transplantation.Time to Appendectomy and Risk of Complicated Appendicitis and Adverse Outcomes in Children.Oropharyngeal Contamination Predisposes to Complications after Neck Dissection: An Analysis of 9462 Patients.JACIE accreditation for blood and marrow transplantation: past, present and future directions of an international model for healthcare quality improvement.Outcomes are Local: Patient, Disease, and Procedure-Specific Risk Factors for Colorectal Surgical Site Infections from a Single Institution.The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: The national NABON Breast Cancer Audit.An unexpectedly high rate of revisions and removals in deep brain stimulation surgery: Analysis of multiple databases.Predicting 30-day postoperative mortality for emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repairs using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Rate and complications of adult epilepsy surgery in North America: Analysis of multiple databases.Are we recording postoperative complications correctly? Comparison of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications.
P2860
Q30359310-54173823-9EB4-4CB2-B1CB-DC993B125758Q30528195-0C4AB39E-2E01-46E8-94DB-2B2AC1415DD7Q33584420-E69A09EF-99F2-4277-AA70-08CCC7D40847Q33749713-846D407F-0CE0-4329-A98E-984BDB88400CQ33793429-77EB5BA8-B732-4CB7-B71E-8083D2F90B31Q34590685-4183771E-1714-430D-933E-C05FD0A14355Q35111770-89271A12-4A83-4AB9-A485-49F5879CFE60Q35147535-9E2C54BC-9D2D-4B82-AC18-A4F44D519A66Q35180487-77A2AFF5-B381-448A-87B6-EDC7C203E8D5Q35585335-E107637C-F741-4CEE-85F5-7839C82F1E39Q35866926-1A481184-B4DF-401E-B329-256471AA9706Q35998813-17D99FD5-8A00-418F-971F-951D33AD795AQ36027192-F024FFC4-C6DB-4DC3-B09F-DAF906FA13D2Q36146004-E993383C-AD8D-4229-811F-2A99402F775FQ36235135-BBD279C2-358C-41A4-8966-B748684C7F77Q36243081-E14FF0D3-F5E7-4FD1-8C6F-BFB4613C54D9Q36424090-F68EB6B4-C979-4C75-9B1A-773562EBD1A6Q36743524-E0156B53-A486-4C11-A1FD-F0CEE81547B9Q36856290-DE15CA4F-5AB2-4195-8321-A183455E5342Q36872097-B798B0BF-AE50-430A-8190-851B4BF7C20CQ37203165-7FCBAB98-75BD-42E5-B1A1-65D0CBB9CB3DQ37349335-C921AAC6-A620-4397-9255-598E9591CF41Q37397155-BF125163-8137-43CB-B8F5-DD04B4D8E3A4Q37453317-4A7A617C-A08A-4BD1-9F9E-2D30ED7F5D85Q37522205-8DBF649A-75D0-4D27-8C54-7526C476F232Q37589311-DB2F90E3-F5CF-4D6F-A90C-2A0AAD80328DQ37611149-AA24C858-13FA-46EC-92C0-DD63209E58FBQ37618596-7740EC59-3554-45C3-9C5C-47AD624B5FB0Q38198772-A26EEF66-DDD2-43E1-940E-A9050475ADF1Q38370225-D2C04106-EE16-4D91-890A-F9BF0B54E618Q38445382-8B58C1A8-FBCF-4DF0-AA87-F23991047852Q38739178-DF77AA08-510A-45BB-BAA3-56B1D5372972Q38805625-8492F905-2937-41B2-9601-7EE7FFABEDBEQ38983543-0D9C4F7E-D7D9-44FB-A998-5CE3B2401E6BQ39155012-A7338F46-A994-4C1A-8029-2B1C1DF00D92Q39373729-4BB2786F-3BB1-45F9-B165-B72D50B44B9CQ39381260-135E34B0-83CA-4CD6-9273-DA9ACDE39ABBQ39711786-9FF168E2-8524-4073-B130-B9C66A6396E4Q40921114-2EB07112-6967-4AB9-AFDB-808D9C729568Q43480473-2A72B823-C0AB-4074-937D-C959265BE424
P2860
Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@ast
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@en
type
label
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@ast
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@en
prefLabel
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@ast
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@en
P2093
P1476
Use of national surgical quali ...... alyst for quality improvement.
@en
P2093
Florence E Turrentine
Katherine S Rowell
Matthew M Hutter
Shukri F Khuri
William G Henderson
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2007.03.024
P577
2007-06-01T00:00:00Z