Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.
about
Knowledge Integration in Cancer: Current Landscape and Future ProspectsSTRengthening analytical thinking for observational studies: the STRATOS initiativePlasma levels of the MMP-9:TIMP-1 complex as prognostic biomarker in breast cancer: a retrospective studyLong noncoding RNAs as novel predictors of survival in human cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisImproving pancreatic cancer diagnosis using circulating tumor cells: prospects for staging and single-cell analysisMicroRNAs: New Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Therapy Prediction and Therapeutic Tools for Breast CancerA systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic serum biomarkers of colorectal cancerMicroRNA-21 and the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysishENT1 expression is predictive of gemcitabine outcome in pancreatic cancer: a systematic reviewBiomarker validation and testingEndocannabinoids as biomarkers of human reproductionPredicting response to epigenetic therapyExpression of sirtuin 1 and 2 is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patientsNuclear DICKKOPF-1 as a biomarker of chemoresistance and poor clinical outcome in colorectal cancerCDX2 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Stage II and Stage III Colon CancerAssociations of P16INK4a promoter hypermethylation with squamous intra-epithelial lesion, cervical cancer and their clinicopathological features: a meta-analysisBiomarkers in reproductive medicine: the promise, and can it be fulfilled?Data-Based Radiation Oncology: Design of Clinical Trials in the Toxicity Biomarkers Era.Immunohistochemical hENT1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.Comprehensive gene expression meta-analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma microarray data defines a robust survival predictor.Improving the Prognostic Ability through Better Use of Standard Clinical Data - The Nottingham Prognostic Index as an Example.Can we eliminate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in favor of neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy for select stage II/III rectal adenocarcinomas: Analysis of the National Cancer Data base.Long non-coding RNA HULC as a potential prognostic biomarker in human cancers: a meta-analysis.Prognostic and predictive value of cathepsin X in serum from colorectal cancer patients.Prognostic Significance of β-Catenin, E-Cadherin, and SOX9 in Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Large Population-Representative Series.Investigation of continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP in patients requiring mechanical ventilation--protocol of the ICEM study.MMP11 and CD2 as novel prognostic factors in hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer.Collagen triple helix repeat containing-1 negatively regulated by microRNA-30c promotes cell proliferation and metastasis and indicates poor prognosis in breast cancer.Multicenter trials using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET to predict chemotherapy response: effects of differential measurement error and bias on power calculations for unselected and enrichment designs.Amplification of TRIM44: pairing a prognostic target with potential therapeutic strategy.Immune cells: plastic players along colorectal cancer progressionThe combination of circulating Ang1 and Tie2 levels predicts progression-free survival advantage in bevacizumab-treated patients with ovarian cancer.Impact of COX2 genotype, ER status and body constitution on risk of early events in different treatment groups of breast cancer patients.A simplified approach for the molecular classification of glioblastomasDiabetic kidney disease: a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes.Tumor heterogeneity at protein level as an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer.Peroxiredoxin-1 protects estrogen receptor α from oxidative stress-induced suppression and is a protein biomarker of favorable prognosis in breast cancerPrognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Survival in overweight patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a multicentre cohort study.Stromal expression of miR-21 identifies high-risk group in triple-negative breast cancer.
P2860
Q24289007-21A76CDA-4AA7-45CF-9005-3A20BB4D496CQ24289520-6C7EC248-9BB0-4FA3-9EB9-8E0117BF8560Q24312148-3D10FCC8-A242-42D5-8CAA-C745469C8D48Q26746258-54E30B1F-2952-40B2-B27D-EA74F4B3413AQ26782719-AF7B609B-4687-4C63-875F-CFF15791F7D6Q26801108-F9B7C595-4EE7-432E-A051-A383437E9945Q26849247-B859924B-FAB5-4A89-AB5B-773E0602865BQ26851333-3B9E3A22-0F46-4CAB-8CA7-A6E750C9965BQ26862139-36624AF0-8AFD-4CF4-93F5-38ECA6C57774Q26863672-EF72601B-57B5-4120-9939-0B5F2531C95DQ27024033-6ECCC5EA-38F6-4BED-AD94-14CA39850725Q27027751-427F0405-542B-4729-8040-8F15CB32D53CQ27308972-887029DE-AFEB-412B-A25B-F0F7BA118558Q27853142-0B69A7D4-3078-4ACE-A170-16BD22816A01Q27853326-9E4D11A7-FEEF-4067-8162-2EF0E30265FEQ28078542-04AFBE89-CEB6-41B5-A69C-6AE1EB58A427Q28488305-650457D5-EE15-49C0-8A6C-5EFB1B43994DQ30234489-56C01E38-D708-4900-ABE3-D60C9E39F808Q30238470-B4B1E5B6-073F-46C0-84F6-56E6205647ECQ30820418-5D970D4F-9C8A-44B7-9C2B-3A0186E5E354Q31052319-75366A16-4375-4A6B-876B-CC9377FFA3CDQ31138958-55586022-628C-45B2-A646-48AB1D00578AQ33591545-FF1C2122-5DF8-4AFB-9460-56B41B2C2A33Q33612332-D4E1A58F-AEC2-409C-8395-FA9E4C0D81D7Q33659798-49984BEE-363B-4013-AE26-A3135BF744B2Q33673813-D44D702B-55D3-438A-80BA-C2618B9A59F0Q33843799-29F2A44F-827E-486B-AB4E-B65DA8F62DE0Q33896545-05473E6B-A797-4F08-991F-D3644164C4BFQ33921056-58A27C79-6867-419B-8C32-4F1046ECC493Q33958974-3A84D01A-763B-4DFE-A6BD-6D6580B29A8CQ33985586-0131D64D-6A65-4104-9A3A-656B1289F579Q34134697-82275EE2-A0D4-43BA-9411-785CD201449DQ34408525-45F01CA5-F000-4D54-8F93-C79B8257957CQ34429149-9409825E-36E8-40FC-AB53-4C5B95350EB6Q34429278-CA70EA1C-89A0-4E67-A09C-6FE063304B52Q34478381-47BA261F-AD9D-4710-A61C-BDF4D25ACF1BQ34485296-E37F3618-AF60-4366-9138-6577DB11A995Q34553646-D8FC204E-5F04-41BF-85FD-9266AF242FBCQ34566049-948E8A4A-1E93-4681-AE1C-CDC4BD789B82Q34647811-5C54D3DA-2CAE-4FCD-A058-D39EF30AC190
P2860
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
name
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
type
label
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
prefLabel
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Reporting Recommendations for ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
P2093
Lisa M McShane
Sheila E Taube
Willi Sauerbrei
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001216
P407
P577
2012-05-29T00:00:00Z