Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
about
Screening for breast cancer with mammographyScreening for breast cancer with mammographyScreening for breast cancer with mammographyScreening for breast cancer with mammographyStudy design: evaluating gene-environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer - the WECARE studyUnderstanding the challenges of adjuvant treatment measurement and reporting in breast cancer: cancer treatment measuring and reportingMuddy water? Variation in reporting receipt of breast cancer radiation therapy by population-based tumor registriesUsing administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study.Treatment patterns for prostate cancer: comparison of Medicare claims data to medical record review.Building better oncology data systems and workforce models in a rapidly changing health care system.Linking cancer registry and hospital discharge data for treatment surveillance.The University of Texas Houston Stroke Registry (UTHSR): implementation of enhanced data quality assurance procedures improves data quality.Accelerated partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast conservation, 2003-2010: a report from the national cancer data base.Development of prostate cancer research database with the clinical data warehouse technology for direct linkage with electronic medical record system.Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.Total Mastectomy or Breast Conservation Therapy? How Radiation Oncologist Accessibility Determines Treatment Choice and Quality: A SEER Data-base Analysis.Addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.Hospital discharge diagnostic and procedure codes for upper gastro-intestinal cancer: how accurate are they?Improving the quality of data entry in a low-budget head injury database.The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United StatesA feasibility study to assess the validity of administrative data sources and self-reported information of breast cancer survivors.Are hospital cancer caseloads related to the validity of staging data reported? A lesson from National Cancer Registry in Taiwan.Combining information from cancer registry and medical records data to improve analyses of adjuvant cancer therapies.Same question, different data source, different answers? Data source agreement for surgical procedures on women with breast cancer.Utility of routine data sources for feedback on the quality of cancer care: an assessment based on clinical practice guidelines.Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.Second solid cancers after radiotherapy for breast cancer in SEER cancer registries.Commentary: "help the doctor"-the culture shift to 21st century care managementBreast cancer care compared with clinical Guidelines: an observational study in France.Using population-based registries to study variations in health care.Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancerUnderascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data.Wait times for surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment of breast cancer in Canada and the United States: greater socioeconomic inequity in America.Using linked routinely collected health data to describe prostate cancer treatment in New South Wales, Australia: a validation studyBreast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration.Disparities in the use of radiation therapy in patients with local-regionally advanced breast cancer.Feasibility of evaluating quality cancer care using registry data and electronic health records: a population-based study.Quantifying limitations in chemotherapy data in administrative health databases: implications for measuring the quality of colorectal cancer care.Effects of being uninsured or underinsured and living in extremely poor neighborhoods on colon cancer care and survival in California: historical cohort analysis, 1996-2011.Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis
P2860
Q24202273-226956ED-CC11-4E27-821C-94F8C81E8187Q24234793-85E9CE61-C051-48F8-A78A-3EA8344EBBD1Q24240411-6CBC59C4-D220-4A27-B4B4-4757B18CA67FQ24244332-8A7032D6-249D-4219-80A4-41D560F8BC90Q24794680-3633B7D8-9E2D-4F7A-A25B-63010C74D3ADQ28710332-B045008C-76A9-4011-8762-FC13400DBE16Q30557544-4E58C249-964F-475E-A0A3-A70172571E67Q30576997-558AE504-C5F9-4EB6-A418-7C7E3197DEB1Q30580698-0388301B-04DC-4556-8DBE-089FE1956110Q30620693-C874E198-04FA-4C18-92CA-F2827463BC33Q30634893-AE9DFB77-30AA-45D0-AEA2-6C059757680FQ30648249-AD667093-62C2-45CB-9F71-82A0538AC368Q30663368-048FB7A4-8AB1-4C02-B66B-0E3641CF0B0CQ30693970-2CB39BD5-9AC5-41D9-B1DA-65BD0E9DA30DQ30779910-5004D1AC-3FB5-4993-BF3E-F7C663C93B88Q30978136-BE262C6C-ED4F-4627-B659-A726C9656A25Q30987695-008C3F13-879E-4196-983D-F9E952E63274Q31096796-088E3F3C-79F5-4B44-9F73-0D8B1BCE64C5Q31120311-BFBA496E-0DEA-4B2F-95AE-CA920626A4D6Q31142308-4A0078EA-C04E-42FF-80DB-8CB6EE703269Q31149309-93C0E77C-DF35-416C-88F8-7AEFD56CBC94Q31156859-FFA49764-E872-4A59-82A3-56312FBECD9BQ33408350-67796EBA-D495-45D9-9EA0-72077067AC01Q33420464-04D738AB-218F-49E3-8A3C-B512F8CD0AF5Q33453945-994A8E48-CB90-48D2-8A45-0205483944CAQ33576098-012283BB-07B9-4668-93BA-1B5D1AC24210Q33620015-7FE36F50-A0E1-4FC3-8B85-7E5FB0839A99Q33715119-43BAAF85-DA31-4C1D-8695-CE5322250A12Q33798676-D3896D12-3E09-4208-998C-5FB9C059C404Q33847949-EEBE752A-71DC-457B-84E2-12A2FF66777BQ33897593-4E9E5210-AFED-4F2A-9C4E-394B1EA6362CQ33946846-12C607B0-F0AC-479B-8BA7-5336D0C1CDE3Q34023002-AD3A2659-F347-432F-96F8-5CFDCC9AACCDQ34041834-1295738F-F80C-4A43-965A-AA495BF44327Q34060566-813F4FB3-5A29-4643-882B-F6DF3E73BD76Q34158859-C3E832C1-E901-4A62-8C25-6F3E4B16DC2CQ34273140-26FD4747-0DF3-46F5-9B8A-509D1277CBE1Q34360966-E8BEA257-B0D4-4B8C-8547-5546755D94C0Q34455690-47088E68-5166-4AE1-94E2-AED2A788D8E7Q34488296-06CB423E-9984-454D-B27C-8BEC0C057D0A
P2860
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@ast
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@en
type
label
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@ast
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@en
prefLabel
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@ast
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
@en
P2093
Jennifer L Malin
John Adams
Katherine L Kahn
Lorna Kwan
Marianne Laouri
Patricia A Ganz
P304
P356
10.1093/JNCI/94.11.835
P407
P577
2002-06-01T00:00:00Z