Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why.
about
Comparison of the performance of rapid prescreening, 10% random review, and clinical risk criteria as methods of internal quality control in cervical cytopathology.Quality control in cervicovaginal cytology by cytohistological correlation.Agreement between cytotechnologists and cytopathologists as a new measure of cytopathologist performance in gynecologic cytology.
P2860
Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
name
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@ast
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@en
type
label
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@ast
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@en
prefLabel
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@ast
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@en
P1476
Rescreening in cervical cytolo ...... works, what doesn't, and why.
@en
P2093
Andrew A Renshaw
P304
P356
10.1016/S0272-2712(03)00054-4
P577
2003-09-01T00:00:00Z