Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews.
about
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancerEndoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stonesUltrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stonesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stonesBeclometasone for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseOn the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.Steps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgeryAssessment of chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement: a systematic reviewBlinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical studyApplication of a Rapid Knowledge Synthesis and Transfer Approach To Assess the Microbial Safety of Low-Moisture FoodsA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of Pregnancy in CKD and CKD Outcomes in PregnancyGastroenteritis Therapies in Developed Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPredictors of children's secondhand smoke exposure at home: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidenceSocial media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping reviewSerum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitisA case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selectionEvaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Diagnosis, Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, Prevention, and Control of Hypertension in Cameroon: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinic-Based and Community-Based StudiesWhat comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis.Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical studyDescribe the outcomes of dysvascular partial foot amputation and how these compare to transtibial amputation: a systematic review protocol for the development of shared decision-making resources.Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachPregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Identifying Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Search Terminology: A Systematic Review of Health Systematic Reviews.Effects of after-school programs with at-risk youth on attendance and externalizing behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?Protocol for a thematic synthesis to identify key themes and messages from a palliative care research networkDiagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews.Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies.Validity of meta-analysis in diabetes: meta-analysis is an indispensable tool in evidence synthesis.Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health.Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study.Cost-effectiveness of oral triptans for acute migraine: mixed treatment comparison.The impact of child sexual abuse on the course of bipolar disorder: a systematic review.Is fat talking a causal risk factor for body dissatisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.A systematic review of buttonhole cannulation practices and outcomes.Prevalence of sexual abuse among children with conduct disorder: a systematic review.
P2860
Q24187358-6B0E55D5-5C35-4B30-98D5-A6D8ED0F362DQ24187882-17B105EC-2D35-468D-8925-7AA10B07EAABQ24187889-5380317A-522E-4661-A288-8487D5227663Q24187893-85588C1C-F11D-430A-9D8D-ADEFFFBD1CECQ24197535-4D4032F6-1445-4A3D-847D-49271562D177Q24658642-445EC2D3-36EB-4BA4-9C4A-AD1723FE87E9Q26866555-33E25BF7-F523-4011-A727-6DE8AF7C621BQ27008476-116BB080-1B49-4287-9ED4-4B04EAD41D9FQ28066076-90AA3DFD-2322-4840-8998-7075FC1C8D07Q28081906-1C2915F7-C6B8-4861-B8FF-BD30738A7C6FQ28081912-56A461A6-0650-476D-8982-852F31815EE5Q28088494-70833A11-1BD2-4E55-9668-9ABFA33CE703Q28397721-D305F002-05DE-4237-8556-94F8E04BA171Q28704109-74286FF5-0762-4DFC-9E92-3650884361DFQ29994579-21C5E8A0-D4F7-4FC4-A9E6-865745E5E26EQ30717163-F27425C5-BE28-4B53-B214-910841EC7657Q30829526-7FBF5702-A9AB-4C69-818B-A6C6E2FBBAC2Q33790534-69F458AA-7ECA-45EA-8F79-8806C8076937Q34258967-59E32470-0B6C-443C-873F-B6020D391E79Q34631658-18D9C318-22C9-49D7-B192-B65E813C1621Q34794434-8DDEFF68-ED7C-45D2-9D1C-BC42A7FB7421Q35861408-08E2C0CC-AA63-4A51-8893-2735CED56B2AQ35958131-591D1256-1A45-4491-A1EE-C68234B49D0DQ35985927-A48AAA0B-AC35-446D-A178-A9AA2BF371EFQ36027995-122D67DF-509E-4D08-95CC-D3D5C95BABF7Q36136111-8971A835-25EC-46C2-BACF-E10987E53C4EQ36165515-531C7962-9BE1-4167-A16F-461923C6ABAFQ36171605-ED0F234E-124B-4DA2-8D91-D1493CD70482Q36198408-D2953A0A-4D16-43A9-B9DB-036B10823289Q36276258-2BBF7A3D-B8DD-4EBD-94E8-547B7BC6C2DEQ37185630-915A70C9-9A4D-43CB-8752-4D4A2B01FF3FQ37188802-008BC82F-EDBC-4D46-845F-0BA6449AFB2FQ37193475-F0DEF707-D5AE-41D3-AB8D-732EAC53DC37Q37560869-5B12E830-1EB9-4004-BDEA-ADB1D7411161Q37579463-6BAB8DF9-2CE0-464A-BC97-C6E94A6B7F03Q38046676-0030E28D-F5F3-42C6-AF2E-04FE85695766Q38076457-7BBE6C3D-B930-4BA5-92F5-C482AEF9EE44Q38118654-C2B07A2F-7A47-46C4-9C1E-756679C4D067Q38121927-857C41ED-E035-4766-9135-001E55325CE2Q38168721-4EEE179E-DA1F-45C3-A630-85C31E425427
P2860
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2006 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
name
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@ast
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@en
type
label
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@ast
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@en
prefLabel
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@ast
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@en
P2093
P1476
Single data extraction generat ...... raction in systematic reviews.
@en
P2093
Ben Vandermeer
Lisa Hartling
Nina Buscemi
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.11.010
P577
2006-03-15T00:00:00Z