Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
about
Partial Coherence Laser Interferometry in Highly Myopic versus Emmetropic Eyes.Accuracy and reliability of IOL master and A-scan immersion biometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length.National Biometry Audit II.Reliability and validity of the partial coherence interferometry for measurement of ocular axial length in children.Reliability of the IOLMaster in axial length evaluation in silicone oil-filled eyes.Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths.Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power.Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment: area versus thickness measurements from elliptical scans centered on the optic nerve.Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive casesAxial Length Measurement Failure Rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in Eyes with Cataract.Noninsured services provided with insured cataract surgery in Canada: ensuring transparent and fair treatment for patients.Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation with Lenstar.Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgeryComparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniquesRefractive predictability of partial coherence interferometry and factors that can affect itRelationship between lenticular power and refractive error in children with hyperopia.Correlation between contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberration based on pupil diameter after cataract surgery.Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.Influence of the prediction error of the first eye undergoing cataract surgery on the refractive outcome of the fellow eyeIntrapersonal comparison of initial axial length, keratometric readings, and intraocular lens power over a 6-month interval using an IOLMaster device.Axial length measurement acquisition rates of two optical biometers in cataractous eyes.Epiretinal membrane surgery: an analysis of 2-step sequential- or combined phacovitrectomy surgery on refraction and macular anatomy in a prospective trial.Optical Biometry Derived Axial Length Measurements Following Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema.Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation.Postoperative Refractive Errors Following Pediatric Cataract Extraction with Intraocular Lens Implantation.National biometry audit.Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery.Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.Modern-day cataract surgery: can we match growing expectations?Circumferential silicone sponge scleral buckling induced axial length changes: case series and comparison to literature.Enhanced Penetration for Axial Length Measurement of Eyes with Dense Cataracts Using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography: A Consecutive Observational Study.Accuracy of axial length measurements obtained by optical biometry and acoustic biometry in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective study.Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio
P2860
Q30429254-734EB6F2-024C-4C7F-BB11-30A6A080062CQ30448624-D3CBF951-71DD-4083-83B2-5AC1B2C7FE54Q30962597-31EB3B41-AAD1-41EB-81C3-255315B072BBQ33214743-5F31851F-7CB8-44C6-8C96-92F5B62A7135Q33221606-6EF46831-ACB1-493D-A45F-A1662EB95D43Q33252287-C5EE4931-616A-46CC-991F-0CC8A6904F22Q33820920-A4B5FE39-8EA1-4E9A-A4AC-5EF1B047E931Q34186359-EFF00194-BB74-4B47-AD82-45C9B0E772BDQ34237193-AA6F59DC-E2AA-43F7-90E6-D5B5E55BA940Q34546692-99ED2086-E5E1-4A97-9CAE-C34BCD566416Q34551904-6AEEDE8E-17DC-41CF-848B-531E5768F08CQ34767160-B90C047D-ACC5-4A8B-A66C-00AE7935A548Q34936761-F9722377-60CE-459A-A9FB-E05D01ABBFA0Q35226668-90BA174B-AE70-4136-8B54-A19E7B6200E5Q35591244-2A33FA08-80BD-4B38-9D1A-E9CC7E17B9F3Q35659908-1CA04B86-0A19-4E2B-B063-05CC5C250A88Q35925144-375F9698-426B-4841-89C4-DE275DF5BC1AQ35976351-3C7E364B-D7F0-40F5-B2EE-357B54F0AF01Q36340947-C5C40B5A-FD5D-4776-9759-03D467C239EAQ36938223-EB142C0D-B2FC-46F0-A5CE-EFB330723365Q37128266-624D3F7A-995D-4E03-9884-139F40A17F1DQ39596798-2FCFEEA1-1FB2-49DB-8C2D-94CD20F7C894Q39974773-B4BD7274-5243-4867-9566-E5B253784063Q40015844-7B4B1108-C322-4251-8BE5-2C78B1C5B691Q42034431-76471AD5-9070-48D5-AC38-4BC1D5FA8DCAQ42049869-65711620-3643-46B2-8AFA-BFB5274542D9Q42263694-7F37960A-543C-4E77-A4DB-A9B153AF2564Q47815278-30C28803-C93B-45C7-994A-49FFA65B5792Q47914874-75AEB2A3-468E-4C1E-89CF-848D5D15DECEQ48373369-8400AA08-4BEC-49C5-A038-87E12A4E5B15Q50048332-102E051C-B267-4135-A0BD-9195FAB2F507Q51725383-D6C5BD34-80D5-4231-9542-87AB1013FB77Q52853066-5191A58C-E741-48DE-A262-37F28D35FA4BQ53073987-94773058-3EEA-41F6-8C4D-485BD6B54D0BQ53075891-681D39CC-59C9-422E-B2AC-47CDB7F38426Q53499665-987B7D2C-9D9B-4A30-9DB9-0E09EE160AA1Q54863161-66D62FF0-A70D-445A-BC93-B97565F52AB5Q55353996-B353BBAD-69CD-4778-ABF6-0B8FCDAC6832Q55544866-3DFAF53B-D410-47EE-9029-D830B3597B76Q58754651-C62ED837-50D7-46DF-B48F-6AE6C854E69B
P2860
Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@ast
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@en
type
label
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@ast
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@en
prefLabel
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@ast
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Partial coherence laser interf ...... cular lens power calculations.
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1038/SJ.EYE.6700157
P577
2002-09-01T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1033486879