National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
about
Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trialEpigenetic reduction of DNA repair in progression to gastrointestinal cancerDynamic tumor growth patterns in a novel murine model of colorectal cancer.State disparities in colorectal cancer rates: Contributions of risk factors, screening, and survival differences.Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes and risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, in a Norwegian cohort: a case control study.The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas.Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race.Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomasAssessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?One year recurrence of aberrant crypt foci.Determinants of polyp size in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.Family history of colorectal cancer: a determinant of advanced adenoma stage or adenoma multiplicity?Number and size distribution of colorectal adenomas under the multistage clonal expansion model of cancerThe cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer.Simulation of colorectal cancer screening: what we do and do not know and does it matter.How much colonoscopy screening should be recommended to individuals with various degrees of family history of colorectal cancer?Optimising the expansion of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.Sporadic adenomatous polyp regression with exisulind is effective but toxic: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose-response studyCD80 down-regulation is associated to aberrant DNA methylation in non-inflammatory colon carcinogenesis.Dynamic microsimulation models for health outcomes: a reviewColon Tumors with the Simultaneous Induction of Driver Mutations in APC, KRAS, and PIK3CA Still Progress through the Adenoma-to-carcinoma Sequence.Harms, benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing versus guaiac fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screeningContribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates.Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening.Clinicopathological features of colon polyps from African-AmericansEffect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.Is Participation in Cancer Phase I Trials Really Therapeutic?The natural history of colorectal adenomas and early cancer.Gastrointestinal cancer screening: screening may release new research funding to improve health service also in routine clinics.Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3-D computerized tomography colonography versus optical colonoscopy for imaging symptomatic gastroenterology patients.Subclonal diversity arises early even in small colorectal tumours and contributes to differential growth fates.Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?Probability model for estimating colorectal polyp progression rates.Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend?Using Observational Data to Calibrate Simulation Models.Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.Editorial: Detection of small polyps: much ado about nothing?
P2860
Q24653775-FB0DA1EE-037A-4FDC-B439-A1AE66556BEEQ28262162-CBD32788-BAEF-469B-BD16-128029D04585Q30585018-904CC2DA-5D2D-423A-9016-1AE4D4767649Q30666588-A14B522D-74A1-4389-B594-03448D6755E5Q33236760-8A5C3548-DEBB-41CF-8118-C75DD8E7A7DAQ33258028-EB51F32E-192F-4256-B135-6E36D8DD88ECQ33588068-4022C430-DDEA-4D29-9E5B-CC40B03C5BE6Q33588581-C5D24952-D841-4270-92C4-62D4C911C1D7Q33598163-8A5433A0-7A11-448C-8C8D-EEDE0219CDA3Q33599139-E47A200E-990F-4567-B323-D8A97D69649DQ33810469-B717450D-A245-493A-AD77-4480E19249D0Q33874772-DD0323C7-52E8-4213-9E5D-80D6F47FC6CBQ33976293-3A46BAC3-DD65-4D65-A8C7-97C2F3266153Q34029577-D8B1C525-7617-4191-8849-F41427EC9DCEQ34038757-3977D9EC-8217-4722-A697-7341F2086AC2Q34055236-63BC0535-71B2-4E0D-A392-4825E6441197Q34107893-BF308E7E-7D76-4EB8-BA4F-27542FFA2F47Q34342290-BD60BB6C-28DF-45EA-A665-8EA8D1E6D774Q35046586-907B1C77-E0E9-4E76-8887-30D22917C32CQ35546169-F75B799E-C98D-47D5-A21F-FE8CD39F827AQ35760255-9F848C63-563D-4FD7-B3FE-7272C92D6E4FQ36067682-843DC774-A0C8-42E6-B5B7-A2FA345BE561Q36116257-69F7918A-800D-4838-981E-89DA4896AE6AQ36132776-D25436CD-EEFC-4BE4-959B-D7EFA45C00FCQ36309075-31CFA26F-CA03-441B-A963-8DD9A4E705AAQ36493434-1016DA53-AFCE-48DA-9A89-531F53735503Q36745822-1474FDB8-C78E-48F2-93C7-C0E4EDAC89F7Q36984242-31D5DBDD-AAAE-452B-B420-888E8BDBA929Q37395173-E7E161C5-B355-4624-8B06-B040D886DEFCQ37660474-EE0EE83C-D7A3-45C7-B2B6-F0B9FEAF15B9Q38040345-5E60820D-A309-49DF-933F-1D5CD8DE713FQ38413252-A3019273-0D77-4D7D-ACF4-7AB62A3E9F3DQ39027269-E86D9025-5785-4136-BE91-61F99C43B265Q39408419-928C4C75-B92F-4E02-9A2D-7C8EBB37700BQ43068551-04080C63-320A-4949-BB93-ECEA5A602BF3Q44261332-094CDAC6-7306-42F1-84A6-F564C3ABA10EQ44594047-BCC1CCA9-C13B-44EC-9D4F-0F914DA8E08FQ47592139-67900670-790C-4F4B-8457-E1E77EAEEF3FQ50432002-E124288D-671C-4C5E-8B4C-67C80C4C4FD4Q53256900-C90F3813-E761-4E86-B506-03C72F184AF2
P2860
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2004 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
name
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@ast
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@en
type
label
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@ast
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@en
prefLabel
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@ast
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas.
@en
P2093
Ann G Zauber
Franka Loeve
Gerrit J Van Oortmarssen
J Dik F Habbema
Marjolein Van Ballegooijen
Sidney J Winawer
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/IJC.20277
P50
P577
2004-09-01T00:00:00Z